`
`
`
`VB ASSETS, LLC,
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`C.A. No. 1:19-cv-01410-MN
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO SEAL DEFENDANT’S
`OPPOSITION TO VB ASSETS’ MOTION TO AMEND TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST TO ADD
`DOCUMENTS DESCRIBING NEW, UNRELEASED FEATURES AND TECHNOLOGY
`ON THE EVE OF TRIAL AND DECLARATION OF MELANIE GENS
`
`ASHBY & GEDDES
`Steven J. Balick (#2114)
`sbalick@ashbygeddes.com
`Andrew C. Mayo (#5207)
`amayo@ashbygeddes.com
`500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
`P.O. Box 1150
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 654-1888
`
`Counsel for Defendants
`Amazon.com Services LLC
`
`Of counsel:
`
`J. David Hadden, CSB No. 176148
`dhadden@fenwick.com
`Saina S. Shamilov, CSB No. 215636
`sshamilov@fenwick.com
`Ravi R. Ranganath, CSB No. 272981
`rranganath@fenwick.com
`Vigen Salmastlian, CSB No. 276846
`vsalmastlian@fenwick.com
`Allen Wang, CBS No. 278953
`awang@fenwick.com
`Johnson Kuncheria, CSB No. 335765
`jkuncheria@fenwick.com
`Min Wu, CSB No. 307512
`min.wu@fenwick.com
`Jeffrey A. Ware, CSB No. 271603
`jware@fenwick.com
`Rebecca A.E. Fewkes, CSB No. 209168
`rfewkes@fenwick.com
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`(650) 988-8500
`
`Dated: October 30, 2023
`
`
`{01953271;v1 }
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 263 Filed 10/30/23 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 10727
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The Court should grant Defendant’s motion to seal with respect to the highly confidential
`
`information of Defendant’s Opposition to VB Assets’ Motion to Amend Trial Exhibit List to Add
`
`Documents Describing New Unreleased Features and Technology on the Eve of Trial
`
`(“Defendant’s Opposition”) and Declaration of Melanie Gens (“Gens Declaration”). Defendant’s
`
`highly confidential information disclosed in four sentences of the Gens Declaration—in the second
`
`and third sentences of paragraph 3 and the second and third sentences in paragraph 4—and
`
`repeated in excerpts of pages 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 of Defendant’s Opposition Brief must be maintained
`
`under seal to prevent serious and real harm to Defendant. Release of Defendant’s highly
`
`confidential information to the public and Defendant’s competitors would create clearly defined
`
`and serious injury to Defendant: an unfair advantage to business competitors as they would gain
`
`access to non-public information about the operation and development of the next generation of
`
`Alexa and violation of Amazon’s privacy interests. Defendant respectfully requests that the Court
`
`maintain these specific portions of Defendant’s Opposition and the Gens Declaration under seal
`
`and permit Amazon to publicly file these documents on the Court’s public filing system with those
`
`portions redacted.
`
`II.
`
`LEGAL STANDARD
`
`Third Circuit common law presumes a public right of access to judicial records, but it also
`
`protects business and financial information when access would cause economic harm, including
`
`competitive harm. In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Pracs. & Prod. Liab. Litig., 924 F.3d 662, 672 (3d
`
`Cir. 2019). Courts have recognized that “the common law right to public access . . . is not
`
`absolute.” In re Cendant Corp., 260 F.3d 183, 194 (3d Cir. 2001) (citations and quotations
`
`{01953271;v1 }
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 263 Filed 10/30/23 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 10728
`
`
`
`omitted); see also Littlejohn v. Bic Corp., 851 F.2d 673, 678 (3d Cir. 1988) (courts may deny
`
`access to “sources of business information that might harm a litigant’s competitive standing”).
`
`The presumption towards public access to judicial records is overcome where a movant
`
`shows “that the interest in secrecy outweighs the presumption.” In re Avandia Mktg., 924 F.3d at
`
`672 (quoting Bank of Am. Nat’l Tr. & Sav. Ass’n v. Hotel Rittenhouse Assocs., 800 F.2d 339, 344
`
`(3d Cir. 1986)). This showing may be made by demonstrating that disclosure will work a clearly
`
`defined and serious injury to the “movant and that the material is the kind of information that
`
`courts will protect. Id. at 672 (citing Miller v. Ind. Hosp., 16 F.3d 549, 551 (3d Cir. 1994)). Courts
`
`apply a “good cause” standard justifying sealing or redacting judicial records. Id. at 671-72. In
`
`“determining whether good cause exists,” courts consider “various factors,” including: “whether
`
`disclosure will violate any privacy interests” and “whether the sharing of information among
`
`litigants will promote fairness and efficiency.” Id. at 671.
`
`III. ARGUMENT
`
`Good cause exists to seal the Gens Declaration and Defendant’s Opposition characterizing
`
`the declaration because public access to the sensitive information “will violate [Amazon’s] privacy
`
`interest” and will provide Amazon’s competitors with an unfair business advantage. See In re
`
`Avandia Mktg., 924 F.3d at 671. The sensitive information here concerns Alexa’s new system that
`
`will be used for certain Alexa services. (Gens Decl. at ¶¶ 3.) This confidential information is
`
`disclosed in four sentences of the Gens Declaration, each described below.
`
`Date when Amazon began developing the new system. The Gens Declaration discloses
`
`non-public information about Amazon’s development of its new system, including when Amazon
`
`first began developing it. (Gens Decl. at ¶ 3.)
`
`Status of public release of the new system. The Gens Declaration identifies the status of
`
`Amazon’s public release of the new system. (Gens Decl. at ¶ 3.)
`
`{01953271;v1 }
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 263 Filed 10/30/23 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 10729
`
`
`
`Amazon’s intended uses for the new Alexa system. The Gens Declaration also discloses
`
`Amazon’s non-public intended uses for the new system for certain Alexa services. (Gens Decl. at
`
`¶ 4.)
`
`Technical details of the new system as compared to the present system. Finally, the
`
`Gens Declaration contrasts the technology and implementation of the new system with the present
`
`system. (Gens Decl. at ¶ 4.)
`
`This confidential information describes fundamental operation of the next generation of
`
`Amazon’s cutting-edge and ubiquitous “Alexa” service. (Declaration of Melanie Gens dated
`
`October 30, 2023 at ¶¶ 2-3.) Each provides a view of Amazon’s private development of its next-
`
`generation system, including when Amazon began its development. (Id. at ¶ 3.) Disclosure of
`
`these details through public access of the Gens Declaration or the Opposition would harm Amazon
`
`and violate its interest in keeping the information private. (Id.) Worse yet, public disclosure of
`
`these valuable details would provide an unfair advantage to business competitors as they would
`
`gain access to non-public information about the operation and development of the next generation
`
`of Alexa. (Id.)
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`The Court should grant Defendant’s motion to seal its Opposition and the Gens Declaration
`
`and permit it to file redacted, unsealed versions of both documents.
`
`
`
`{01953271;v1 }
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 263 Filed 10/30/23 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 10730
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/s/ Andrew C. Mayo
`Steven J. Balick (#2114)
`sbalick@ashbygeddes.com
`Andrew C. Mayo (#5207)
`amayo@ashbygeddes.com
`ASHBY & GEDDES
`500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
`P.O. Box 1150
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 654-1888
`
`Counsel for Defendants
`Amazon.com Services LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: October 30, 2023
`
`
`
`
`Of counsel:
`
`J. David Hadden, CSB No. 176148
`dhadden@fenwick.com
`Saina S. Shamilov, CSB No. 215636
`sshamilov@fenwick.com
`Ravi R. Ranganath, CSB No. 272981
`rranganath@fenwick.com
`Vigen Salmastlian, CSB No. 276846
`vsalmastlian@fenwick.com
`Allen Wang, CBS No. 278953
`awang@fenwick.com
`Johnson Kuncheria, CSB No. 335765
`jkuncheria@fenwick.com
`Min Wu, CSB No. 307512
`min.wu@fenwick.com
`Jeffrey A. Ware, CSB No. 271603
`jware@fenwick.com
`Rebecca A.E. Fewkes, CSB No. 209168
`rfewkes@fenwick.com
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`(650) 988-8500
`
`{01953271;v1 }
`
`5
`
`