throbber
Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 263 Filed 10/30/23 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 10726
`
`
`
`VB ASSETS, LLC,
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`AMAZON.COM SERVICES LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`C.A. No. 1:19-cv-01410-MN
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT’S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO SEAL DEFENDANT’S
`OPPOSITION TO VB ASSETS’ MOTION TO AMEND TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST TO ADD
`DOCUMENTS DESCRIBING NEW, UNRELEASED FEATURES AND TECHNOLOGY
`ON THE EVE OF TRIAL AND DECLARATION OF MELANIE GENS
`
`ASHBY & GEDDES
`Steven J. Balick (#2114)
`sbalick@ashbygeddes.com
`Andrew C. Mayo (#5207)
`amayo@ashbygeddes.com
`500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
`P.O. Box 1150
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 654-1888
`
`Counsel for Defendants
`Amazon.com Services LLC
`
`Of counsel:
`
`J. David Hadden, CSB No. 176148
`dhadden@fenwick.com
`Saina S. Shamilov, CSB No. 215636
`sshamilov@fenwick.com
`Ravi R. Ranganath, CSB No. 272981
`rranganath@fenwick.com
`Vigen Salmastlian, CSB No. 276846
`vsalmastlian@fenwick.com
`Allen Wang, CBS No. 278953
`awang@fenwick.com
`Johnson Kuncheria, CSB No. 335765
`jkuncheria@fenwick.com
`Min Wu, CSB No. 307512
`min.wu@fenwick.com
`Jeffrey A. Ware, CSB No. 271603
`jware@fenwick.com
`Rebecca A.E. Fewkes, CSB No. 209168
`rfewkes@fenwick.com
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`(650) 988-8500
`
`Dated: October 30, 2023
`
`
`{01953271;v1 }
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 263 Filed 10/30/23 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 10727
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The Court should grant Defendant’s motion to seal with respect to the highly confidential
`
`information of Defendant’s Opposition to VB Assets’ Motion to Amend Trial Exhibit List to Add
`
`Documents Describing New Unreleased Features and Technology on the Eve of Trial
`
`(“Defendant’s Opposition”) and Declaration of Melanie Gens (“Gens Declaration”). Defendant’s
`
`highly confidential information disclosed in four sentences of the Gens Declaration—in the second
`
`and third sentences of paragraph 3 and the second and third sentences in paragraph 4—and
`
`repeated in excerpts of pages 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 of Defendant’s Opposition Brief must be maintained
`
`under seal to prevent serious and real harm to Defendant. Release of Defendant’s highly
`
`confidential information to the public and Defendant’s competitors would create clearly defined
`
`and serious injury to Defendant: an unfair advantage to business competitors as they would gain
`
`access to non-public information about the operation and development of the next generation of
`
`Alexa and violation of Amazon’s privacy interests. Defendant respectfully requests that the Court
`
`maintain these specific portions of Defendant’s Opposition and the Gens Declaration under seal
`
`and permit Amazon to publicly file these documents on the Court’s public filing system with those
`
`portions redacted.
`
`II.
`
`LEGAL STANDARD
`
`Third Circuit common law presumes a public right of access to judicial records, but it also
`
`protects business and financial information when access would cause economic harm, including
`
`competitive harm. In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Pracs. & Prod. Liab. Litig., 924 F.3d 662, 672 (3d
`
`Cir. 2019). Courts have recognized that “the common law right to public access . . . is not
`
`absolute.” In re Cendant Corp., 260 F.3d 183, 194 (3d Cir. 2001) (citations and quotations
`
`{01953271;v1 }
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 263 Filed 10/30/23 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 10728
`
`
`
`omitted); see also Littlejohn v. Bic Corp., 851 F.2d 673, 678 (3d Cir. 1988) (courts may deny
`
`access to “sources of business information that might harm a litigant’s competitive standing”).
`
`The presumption towards public access to judicial records is overcome where a movant
`
`shows “that the interest in secrecy outweighs the presumption.” In re Avandia Mktg., 924 F.3d at
`
`672 (quoting Bank of Am. Nat’l Tr. & Sav. Ass’n v. Hotel Rittenhouse Assocs., 800 F.2d 339, 344
`
`(3d Cir. 1986)). This showing may be made by demonstrating that disclosure will work a clearly
`
`defined and serious injury to the “movant and that the material is the kind of information that
`
`courts will protect. Id. at 672 (citing Miller v. Ind. Hosp., 16 F.3d 549, 551 (3d Cir. 1994)). Courts
`
`apply a “good cause” standard justifying sealing or redacting judicial records. Id. at 671-72. In
`
`“determining whether good cause exists,” courts consider “various factors,” including: “whether
`
`disclosure will violate any privacy interests” and “whether the sharing of information among
`
`litigants will promote fairness and efficiency.” Id. at 671.
`
`III. ARGUMENT
`
`Good cause exists to seal the Gens Declaration and Defendant’s Opposition characterizing
`
`the declaration because public access to the sensitive information “will violate [Amazon’s] privacy
`
`interest” and will provide Amazon’s competitors with an unfair business advantage. See In re
`
`Avandia Mktg., 924 F.3d at 671. The sensitive information here concerns Alexa’s new system that
`
`will be used for certain Alexa services. (Gens Decl. at ¶¶ 3.) This confidential information is
`
`disclosed in four sentences of the Gens Declaration, each described below.
`
`Date when Amazon began developing the new system. The Gens Declaration discloses
`
`non-public information about Amazon’s development of its new system, including when Amazon
`
`first began developing it. (Gens Decl. at ¶ 3.)
`
`Status of public release of the new system. The Gens Declaration identifies the status of
`
`Amazon’s public release of the new system. (Gens Decl. at ¶ 3.)
`
`{01953271;v1 }
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 263 Filed 10/30/23 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 10729
`
`
`
`Amazon’s intended uses for the new Alexa system. The Gens Declaration also discloses
`
`Amazon’s non-public intended uses for the new system for certain Alexa services. (Gens Decl. at
`
`¶ 4.)
`
`Technical details of the new system as compared to the present system. Finally, the
`
`Gens Declaration contrasts the technology and implementation of the new system with the present
`
`system. (Gens Decl. at ¶ 4.)
`
`This confidential information describes fundamental operation of the next generation of
`
`Amazon’s cutting-edge and ubiquitous “Alexa” service. (Declaration of Melanie Gens dated
`
`October 30, 2023 at ¶¶ 2-3.) Each provides a view of Amazon’s private development of its next-
`
`generation system, including when Amazon began its development. (Id. at ¶ 3.) Disclosure of
`
`these details through public access of the Gens Declaration or the Opposition would harm Amazon
`
`and violate its interest in keeping the information private. (Id.) Worse yet, public disclosure of
`
`these valuable details would provide an unfair advantage to business competitors as they would
`
`gain access to non-public information about the operation and development of the next generation
`
`of Alexa. (Id.)
`
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`The Court should grant Defendant’s motion to seal its Opposition and the Gens Declaration
`
`and permit it to file redacted, unsealed versions of both documents.
`
`
`
`{01953271;v1 }
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 263 Filed 10/30/23 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 10730
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`/s/ Andrew C. Mayo
`Steven J. Balick (#2114)
`sbalick@ashbygeddes.com
`Andrew C. Mayo (#5207)
`amayo@ashbygeddes.com
`ASHBY & GEDDES
`500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
`P.O. Box 1150
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 654-1888
`
`Counsel for Defendants
`Amazon.com Services LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: October 30, 2023
`
`
`
`
`Of counsel:
`
`J. David Hadden, CSB No. 176148
`dhadden@fenwick.com
`Saina S. Shamilov, CSB No. 215636
`sshamilov@fenwick.com
`Ravi R. Ranganath, CSB No. 272981
`rranganath@fenwick.com
`Vigen Salmastlian, CSB No. 276846
`vsalmastlian@fenwick.com
`Allen Wang, CBS No. 278953
`awang@fenwick.com
`Johnson Kuncheria, CSB No. 335765
`jkuncheria@fenwick.com
`Min Wu, CSB No. 307512
`min.wu@fenwick.com
`Jeffrey A. Ware, CSB No. 271603
`jware@fenwick.com
`Rebecca A.E. Fewkes, CSB No. 209168
`rfewkes@fenwick.com
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`(650) 988-8500
`
`{01953271;v1 }
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket