`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`VB ASSETS, LLC,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC., et al.,
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`C.A. No. 1:19-cv-01410-MN
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS
`
`Good morning. My name is Maryellen Noreika, and I am the Judge who will be presiding
`
`over the trial in this civil case for which a jury is about to be selected. I am going to ask you some
`
`questions, the purpose of which is to: (1) enable us to determine whether any prospective juror
`
`should be excused for cause; and (2) enable counsel for the parties to exercise their individual
`
`judgment with respect to what are called peremptory challenges, that is, challenges that counsel
`
`can make to a potential juror without giving any reason.
`
`Before I ask any questions, I am going to ask my Deputy to swear the jury panel to answer
`
`all questions truthfully. (Panel sworn.)
`
`You each have a list of the questions that I am also going to read out loud. If you answer
`
`“yes” to any of the questions that I ask, please make a note of that on the list. At the end of the
`
`questions, I will ask whether you answered yes to any question and, if you did, take you out into
`
`my conference room where you will talk with the lawyers and me about your answers.
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 242 Filed 09/28/23 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 9638
`
`
`
`We are having jury selection for a case that will begin today and last up to 5 days – until
`
`Wednesday November 8, 2023. The trial will be timed, so the attorneys must complete their
`
`presentations in that time. It is possible, however, that jury deliberations may require you to be
`
`here longer than the scheduled number of days. Our trial days will run approximately from 9:00
`
`a.m. to 4:30 p.m. each day.
`
`With that introduction, my questions are:
`
`1.
`
`Does the schedule that I have just mentioned present a special problem to any of
`
`you?
`
`2.
`
`VB Assets, LLC (“VB Assets”) filed this lawsuit asserting that Amazon.com,
`
`Inc., Amazon.com LLC, Amazon Web Services, Inc., A2Z Development Center, Inc. d/b/a
`
`Lab126, Rawles, LLC, AMZN Mobile LLC, AMZN Mobile 2 LLC, Amazon.com Services, Inc.
`
`f/k/a Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc., and Amazon Digital Services LLC, which I will refer
`
`to collectively as “Amazon” infringe five patents.1 Amazon has responded by asserting that it
`
`does not infringe VB Assets’s patents and that the patents are invalid. Have you heard anything
`
`about this case prior to today?
`
`
`
`1 The parties are working in good faith to negotiate a stipulation to address certain non-existent
`entities and to substitute Amazon.com Services LLC for defendants Amazon.com, Inc.,
`Amazon.com LLC, Amazon Web Services, Inc., A2Z Development Center, Inc. d/b/a Lab 126,
`AMZN Mobile LLC, AMZN Mobile 2 LLC, Amazon.com Services, Inc. f/k/a Amazon Fulfillment
`Services, Inc., and Amazon Digital Services, LLC as a defendant in-suit.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 242 Filed 09/28/23 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 9639
`
`
`
`3.
`
`[[VB ASSETS PROPOSAL: This case involves voice-enabled speakers,
`
`such as Echo, and personal assistants like Alexa. Do you have experience with these types
`
`of products?2
`
`4.
`
`VB ASSETS PROPOSAL: Do you have any personal opinions or views
`
`about this type of technology?]]
`
`5.
`
`[[AMAZON PROPOSAL: This case involves voice-enabled speakers, such
`
`as Echo, and personal assistants such as Alexa. Do you have any strong opinions about this
`
`type of technology that could impact your ability to be a fair and impartial juror in this
`
`case?]]3
`
`6.
`
`The lawyers and law firms involved in this case are listed here. Please carefully
`
`review the list.
`
`• Ashby & Geddes, P.A.
`• Fenwick & West LLP
`• Smith, Katzenstein & Jenkins LLP
`• Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C.
`• Neal C. Belgam
`• Ryan S. Benyamin
`• Johnathan L. Chai
`• Dargaye Churnet
`• Rebecca A.E. Fewkes
`• Todd R. Gregorian
`
`
`
`2 VB ASSETS’S POSITION: We believe that it’s helpful to know if any jurors have
`personal experience with the accused products and, if so, whether they have strong opinions
`about the technology. Amazon’s phrasing may result in juror’s with strong feeling about the
`accused products staying silent because they do not feel comfortable stating that they cannot be
`fair and impartial.
`
`3 AMAZON’S POSITION: VB Assets’ Questions 3 and 4 are too open-ended and will create
`an inefficient voir dire process. Amazon’s Questions 5 captures the subject matter of VB Asserts’
`Questions 3 and 4 and will provide for a more efficient voir dire.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 242 Filed 09/28/23 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 9640
`
`
`
`• J. David Hadden
`• Johnson Kuncheria
`• Su Li
`• Matthew Macdonald
`• Melanie L. Mayer
`• Andrew C. Mayo
`• Steven J. Balick
`• Jason Z. Miller
`• Jamie Y. Otto
`• Ravi Ranganath
`• Vigen Salmastlian
`• Saina S. Shamilov
`• Ryan R. Smith
`• Brad Tennis
`• Allen Wang
`• Jeffrey Ware
`• Min Wu
`• James C. Yoon
`• Eric B. Young
`• Eric Zhou
`
`Do you or your immediate family members or close friends know of, have any business
`
`dealings with, or have any employment or other relationship with any of these attorneys or law
`
`firms?
`
`list.
`
`7.
`
`The potential witnesses in this case are listed here. Please carefully review the
`
`• Larry Baldwin
`• Rino Caruccio
`• Frederic Deramat
`• Adesh Desai
`• Philippe Di Cristo
`• Cassius Elston
`• Tom Freeman
`• Scott Hayden
`• Björn Hoffmeister
`• Michael Johnson
`• Todd Kenck
`• Mike Kennewick
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 242 Filed 09/28/23 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 9641
`
`
`
`• Rich Kennewick
`• Vinod Krishnan
`• David Meckstroth
`• Rajiv Mehta
`• John Peck
`• David Pepper
`• Joe Polifroni
`• Nathaniel Polish
`• Karthik Ramakrishnan
`• Brett Reed
`• Nick Siska
`• Nikko Ström
`• David Thomas
`• Ryan Thomas
`• Keith Ugone
`• Kelly Vanee
`• Kuansan Wang
`• Matt Wong
`
`Are you or is anyone in your immediate family or your close friends related to, or
`
`personally acquainted with, any of those individuals?
`
`8.
`
`Have you or anyone in your immediate family or close friends had any
`
`experience with patents, patent law, patented technology, or the United States Patent and
`
`Trademark Office?
`
`9.
`
`Have you or any member of your immediate family or close friends ever applied
`
`for or obtained a patent, copyright, and/or trademark?
`
`10.
`
`Do you have any opinions about patents or the patent system that could impact
`
`your ability to be a fair and impartial juror in this case?
`
`11.
`
`Have you or has anyone in your immediate family or close friends been
`
`employed by Amazon or any of its affiliated companies, VB Asserts, or VoiceBox?
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 242 Filed 09/28/23 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 9642
`
`
`
`12.
`
`Have you or has anyone in your immediate family or close friends had any
`
`business dealings with Amazon or any of its affiliated companies, VB Assets, or VoiceBox, that
`
`could impact your ability to be a fair and impartial juror in this case?
`
`13.
`
`Do you or does anyone in your immediate family or close friends own stock in
`
`Amazon [[AMAZON PROPOSAL: that constitutes 10% or more of your or their net
`
`worth?]]45
`
`14.
`
`Do you or does anyone in your immediate family or close friends own stock in
`
`VB Assets or VoiceBox?
`
`15.
`
`Do you have any strong feelings, positive or negative, concerning Amazon, VB
`
`Assets, or VoiceBox, or their products or services, that could impact your ability to be a fair and
`
`impartial juror in this case?
`
`16.
`
`Do you have any formal education or training or have you worked in any of the
`
`following fields: law, engineering, computer programming, computer science, software
`
`development, voice assistant technology, or speech processing?
`
`17.
`
`Have you or any member of your immediate family ever been a plaintiff, a
`
`defendant, or a witness in a lawsuit?
`
`
`
`4 AMAZON’S POSITION: Questions 13 with the addition proposed by Amazon has been
`asked by the Court at least in TrackTime LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., D. Del. No. 1:18-cv-1518-MN,
`Sept. 13, 2023 Trial Tr. at 23:14–1–6. The question as proposed by VB Assets may result in too
`many Yes answers and affect the efficiency of the voir dire process while not impacting any
`individual’s ability to be a fair and impartial juror. Amazon also does not object to the Court
`eliminating questions 13 and 14.
`
`5 VB ASSETS’s POSITION: Defendants believe that understanding if a juror has a financial
`stake in a party is important. A follow-up question can clarify the type of ownership interest.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 242 Filed 09/28/23 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 9643
`
`
`
`18.
`
`Have you or any member of your immediate family ever served as a juror in a
`
`criminal or civil lawsuit?
`
`19.
`
`Have you or any member of your immediate family ever had any experience
`
`with the legal system that could impact your ability to be a fair and impartial juror?
`
`20.
`
`This is the last question. Do you know of any other matter that you believe
`
`should be called to the Court’s attention as having some bearing upon your qualifications or
`
`ability to sit as a juror, or that you think may prevent you from rendering a fair and impartial
`
`verdict based solely upon the evidence and my instructions as to the law?
`
`
`
`