throbber
Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 177 Filed 11/01/22 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 2638
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`C. A. No. 19-1410-MN
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`VB ASSETS, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC.; AMAZON.COM LLC;
`AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.;
`A2Z DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC.
`d/b/a LAB126; RAWLES LLC; AMZN
`MOBILE LLC; AMZN MOBILE 2 LLC;
`AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC. f/k/a AMAZON
`FULFILLMENT SERVICES, INC.; and AMAZON
`DIGITAL SERVICES LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`MOTION AND ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 and the attached certification, counsel moves for the
`
`admission pro hac vice of Allen Wang to represent the defendants in this matter. Pursuant to this
`
`Court’s Standing Order effective September 1, 2016, the fee for the above-listed attorney will be
`
`submitted upon the filing of this motion.
`
`ASHBY & GEDDES
`
`/s/ Steven J. Balick
`_____________________________
`Steven J. Balick (#2114)
`Andrew C. Mayo (#5207)
`500 Delaware Avenue, 8th Floor
`P.O. Box 1150
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 654-1888
`sbalick@ashbygeddes.com
`amayo@ashbygeddes.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`
`Date: November 1, 2022
`

`
`{01851752;v1 }
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 177 Filed 11/01/22 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 2639
`

`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`C. A. No. 19-1410-MN
`
`VB ASSETS, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`AMAZON.COM, INC.; AMAZON.COM LLC;
`AMAZON WEB SERVICES, INC.;
`A2Z DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC.
`d/b/a LAB126; RAWLES LLC; AMZN
`MOBILE LLC; AMZN MOBILE 2 LLC;
`AMAZON.COM SERVICES, INC. f/k/a AMAZON
`FULFILLMENT SERVICES, INC.; and AMAZON
`DIGITAL SERVICES LLC,
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`

`ORDER
`
`This ___ day of _____________, 2022, the Court having considered the motion for the
`
`admission pro hac vice of Allen Wang to represent the defendants in the above action; now
`
`therefore,
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that counsel’s motion is granted, and that the foregoing
`
`attorney is admitted pro hac vice.
`
`
`

`
`
`
`____________________________________
`United States District Judge
`
`{01851752;v1 }
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 177 Filed 11/01/22 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 2640
`

`
`
`
`CERTIFICATION BY COUNSEL TO BE ADMITTED PRO HAC VICE
`
`Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5, I certify that I am eligible for admission to this Court, that I
`
`am admitted, practicing, and in good standing as a member of the Bar of the State of California,
`
`and, pursuant to Local Rule 83.6, that I submit to the disciplinary jurisdiction of this Court for
`
`any alleged misconduct which occurs in the preparation or course of this action. I also certify
`
`that I am generally familiar with this Court’s Local Rules.
`
`
`
`/s/ Allen Wang
`________________________
`Allen Wang
`FENWICK & WEST LLP
`Silicon Valley Center
`801 California Street
`Mountain View, CA 94041
`(650) 988-8500
`
`
`
`Dated: November 1, 2022
`
`
`
`{01851752;v1 }
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket