throbber
Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 1 of 46 PageID #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`))
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`VB Assets, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Amazon.com, Inc.; Amazon.com LLC; Amazon
`Web Services, Inc.; A2Z Development Center,
`Inc. d/b/a Lab126; Rawles LLC; AMZN Mobile
`LLC; AMZN Mobile 2 LLC; Amazon.com
`Services, Inc. f/k/a Amazon Fulfillment Services,
`Inc.; and Amazon Digital Services LLC,
`
`Defendants.
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`VB Assets, LLC (“Plaintiff” or “VoiceBox”) hereby alleges as follows for its complaint
`
`against Defendants Amazon.com, Inc.; Amazon.com LLC; Amazon Web Services, Inc.; A2Z
`
`Development Center, Inc. d/b/a Lab126; Rawles LLC; AMZN Mobile LLC; AMZN Mobile 2
`
`LLC; Amazon.com Services, Inc. f/k/a Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.; and Amazon Digital
`
`Services LLC (collectively, “Defendants” or “Amazon”):
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 2 of 46 PageID #: 2
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`VoiceBox, through its predecessor companies VoiceBox Technologies
`
`Corporation and VoiceBox Technologies, Inc. (collectively “VoiceBox Technologies”), pioneered
`
`voice-based search and commerce technology. It invented what Amazon itself has described as
`
`“Echo-like” products long before Amazon.
`
`2.
`
`In recognition of its many innovations, the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
`
`awarded and issued the VoiceBox Patents.1 The innovations in these patents were fundamental to
`
`the development of voice commerce technology.
`
`3.
`
`VoiceBox Technologies’ opportunities to promote and build a business based on
`
`these patents were crushed when Amazon introduced the infringing Echo and Alexa Products2
`
`and used its enormous size and clout to poach dozens of VoiceBox Technologies’ engineers and
`
`scientists.
`
`4.
`
`VoiceBox has brought this case to hold Amazon accountable for its infringement
`
`of VoiceBox’s patent rights.
`
`1 “VoiceBox Patents” collectively refers to U.S. Patent Nos. 8,073,681 (“the ’681 patent”);
`9,015,049 (“the ’049 patent”); 9,626,703 (“the ’703 patent”); 7,818,176 (“the ’176 patent”);
`8,886,536 (“the ’536 patent”); and 9,269,097 (“the ’097 patent”).
`2 “Alexa Products” collectively refers to Amazon’s Alexa virtual assistant and offerings that
`include Alexa, including the Echo product line (such as Echo 1st Gen., Echo 2nd Gen., Echo Dot
`1st Gen., Echo Dot 2nd Gen., Echo Dot 3rd Gen., Echo Dot Kids Edition, Echo Show 1st Gen.,
`Echo Show 2nd Gen., Echo Show 5, Echo Spot, Echo Plus 1st Gen., Echo Plus 2nd Gen., Echo
`Auto, and Echo Look), Amazon’s Alexa apps, Music apps, and Shopping apps on a smartphone
`or other mobile device, Amazon’s Alexa cloud, Alexa Voice Services, and Amazon.com
`website, and any other device, app, or instrumentality that includes, provides access to, or works
`with Alexa (such as Amazon Tap, Amazon Dash Wand, Echo Wall Clock, AmazonBasics
`Microwave, Amazon SmartPlug, Amazon Fire TV Sticks, Amazon Fire TVs, Amazon Fire TV
`Cubes, and Amazon Fire and Fire HD tablets) as well as software, hardware, and cloud
`infrastructure associated with any of the foregoing.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 3 of 46 PageID #: 3
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`5.
`
`VB Assets, LLC, VoiceBox, is a limited liability company organized under the
`
`laws of Delaware and has its principal place of business at 1229A 120th Ave. NE, Bellevue, WA
`
`98005.
`
`6.
`
`On information and belief, Amazon.com, Inc. is a corporation incorporated in
`
`Delaware and has a principal place of business at 410 Terry Avenue North, Seattle, WA, 98109.
`
`On information and belief, Amazon.com, Inc. is the ultimate parent company of the other
`
`companies that make up Amazon, and is responsible for making, using, selling, offering for sale
`
`and/or importing Alexa Products.
`
`7.
`
`On information and belief, Amazon.com LLC is a limited liability company
`
`organized under the laws of Delaware and has a principal place of business at 410 Terry Avenue
`
`North, Seattle, WA, 98109. On information and belief, Amazon.com LLC includes as members
`
`various operating companies, which make, use, sell, offer for sale, and/or import Alexa Products.
`
`8.
`
`On information and belief, Amazon Web Services, Inc. is a corporation
`
`incorporated in Delaware and has a principal place of business at 410 Terry Avenue North,
`
`Seattle, WA, 98109. On information and belief, Amazon Web Services, Inc. provides Alexa cloud
`
`computing platforms, that are Alexa Products or are for use with one or more Alexa Products.
`
`9.
`
`On information and belief, A2Z Development Center, Inc. d/b/a Lab126 is a
`
`corporation incorporated in Delaware and has its principal place of business at 1120 Enterprise
`
`Way Sunnyvale, CA 94089. On information and belief, A2Z Development Center, Inc. d/b/a
`
`Lab126 performed research and development, including for one or more Alexa Products.
`
`10.
`
`On information and belief, Rawles LLC is a limited liability company formed
`
`under the laws of Delaware and has its principal place of business at 103 Foulk Road, Suite 100,
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 4 of 46 PageID #: 4
`
`Wilmington, DE 19803. On information and belief, Rawles LLC performed research and
`
`development, including for one or more Alexa Products.
`
`11.
`
`On information and belief, AMZN Mobile LLC is a limited liability company
`
`organized under the laws of Delaware and has a principal place of business near Seattle, WA. On
`
`information and belief, AMZN Mobile LLC provides mobile apps that are Alexa Products or are
`
`for use with Alexa Products.
`
`12.
`
`On information and belief, AMZN Mobile 2 LLC is a limited liability company
`
`organized under the laws of Delaware and has a principal place of business near Seattle, WA. On
`
`information and belief, AMZN Mobile 2 LLC provides mobile apps that are Alexa Products or
`
`are for use with Alexa Products.
`
`13.
`
`On information and belief, Amazon.com Services, Inc. f/k/a Amazon Fulfillment
`
`Services, Inc. is a corporation incorporated in Delaware and has a principal place of business at
`
`410 Terry Ave. N. Seattle, WA 98109. On information and belief, Amazon.com Services, Inc.
`
`f/k/a Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc. participated in the sale or offer for sale of one or more
`
`Alexa Products.
`
`14.
`
`On information and belief, Amazon Digital Services LLC is a limited liability
`
`company organized under the laws of Delaware and has a principal place of business at 410
`
`Terry Ave. N, Seattle, WA 98109. On information and belief, Amazon Digital Services LLC has
`
`participated in the sale or offer for sale of one or more Alexa Products and/or has provided digital
`
`services and content for use by Alexa Products.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`15.
`
`This Court has original jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action under 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a) because the action arises under the patent laws of the United States.
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 5 of 46 PageID #: 5
`
`16.
`
`Personal jurisdiction over each Defendant is proper in this District based on one
`
`or more of the following: its presence in this judicial district; it has availed itself of the rights and
`
`benefits of the laws of Delaware; or it has derived substantial revenue from sales of Alexa
`
`Products in Delaware and it has systematic and continuous business contacts with Delaware.
`
`Each Defendant was incorporated in Delaware and/or formed under the laws of Delaware and
`
`Amazon designs Alexa Products, which are advertised, offered for sale, sold, and used in
`
`Delaware.
`
`17.
`
`Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1400(b) and 28 U.S.C. §§
`
`1391(b)(1), (b)(2). For purposes of § 1400(b), each Defendant was incorporated in Delaware
`
`and/or formed under the laws of Delaware and therefore resides within this District. For purposes
`
`of § 1391(b)(1), (b)(2), Amazon resides in the District of Delaware by virtue of being
`
`incorporated in Delaware and/or formed under the laws of Delaware.
`
`FACTUAL BACKGROUND
`
`A.
`
`18.
`
`VoiceBox Technologies Invents Groundbreaking Voice Technology
`
`In 2001, three brothers, Mike, Rich, and Bob Kennewick founded VoiceBox
`
`Technologies to bring natural language understanding (“NLU”) to a wide array of computer
`
`applications. They recognized that the typical computer speech-recognition systems forced
`
`human operators to adhere to a limited number of rigid speech prompts. These rigid prompts
`
`limited how systems were used and inhibited the widespread adoption of speech-recognition
`
`systems. The brothers believed that VoiceBox Technologies could become the first company to
`
`enable people to naturally and effectively interact with computer speech systems.
`
`19.
`
`From its inception, VoiceBox Technologies engaged in intense research efforts to
`
`develop its NLU technology. As part of these efforts, VoiceBox Technologies achieved a
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 6 of 46 PageID #: 6
`
`significant milestone when it developed an early prototype called “Cybermind.” As demonstrated
`
`on the King5 news, Cybermind was a voice-controlled speaker that could provide weather,
`
`recipes, sports scores, calendar updates, or play a song.3
`
`Figure 1: Cybermind Prototype
`
`20.
`
`VoiceBox Technologies’ groundbreaking work did not go unrecognized. After
`
`learning about VoiceBox Technologies’ technology, Toyota hired it to build a sophisticated NLU
`
`speech interface for its Lexus automobiles. VoiceBox Technologies built the voice and NLU
`
`capability for Toyota’s award-winning Entune multimedia system.
`
`21.
`
`As part of the development effort of an NLU interface for Lexus, VoiceBox
`
`Technologies demonstrated a personal assistant called “Alexus” that showcased the power of its
`
`Conversational Voice technology. On information and belief, the VoiceBox Technologies
`
`“Alexus” concept was introduced to the public more than six months before Amazon announced
`
`“Alexa.”
`
`3https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDcRyPnvWhw
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 7 of 46 PageID #: 7
`
`Figure 2: “Alexus” Demonstration
`
`22.
`
`Throughout its research and development efforts, VoiceBox Technologies realized
`
`that its technology could be deployed in a wide range of applications from connected home to
`
`mobile personal assistants.
`
`Figure 3: Connected Home
`
`Figure 4: Mobile
`
`23.
`
`By January 2012, VoiceBox Technologies was a leader in NLU and
`
`conversational voice technology. Leading companies throughout the world, including Toyota,
`
`Lexus, TomTom, Pioneer, Chrysler, Dodge, and Magellan used VoiceBox Technologies’ award-
`
`winning and patented contextual speech technology. VoiceBox Technologies had software
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 8 of 46 PageID #: 8
`
`applications that ran on smart speakers, in-car systems, smartphones, smart TVs, computers,
`
`tablets, e-readers, and personal navigation devices.
`
`24.
`
`In 2013, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (“IEEE”) ranked
`
`VoiceBox Technologies number 13 in patent power for the computer software industry.
`
`VoiceBox Technologies had become the leader in conversational Artificial Intelligence (“AI”),
`
`including Voice Recognition (VR), NLU, and AI services.
`
`B.
`
`25.
`
`Amazon Takes VoiceBox’s Technology
`
`In 2011, VoiceBox Technologies contacted Amazon to explore a potential
`
`business relationship where VoiceBox Technologies would provide core NLU services to
`
`Amazon. Amazon’s corporate development department expressed interest and asked for
`
`“company and/or product overview slides” to facilitate an October 7, 2011 teleconference. In
`
`response, VoiceBox Technologies provided Amazon with a presentation that described its award-
`
`winning patented technology and explicitly referred to VoiceBox Technologies’ “patented
`
`Contextual Speech Technology.” Slides from that presentation are reproduced below:
`
`Figure 5: 2011 Slides
`
`26.
`
`Amazon was so impressed by the technology VoiceBox Technologies presented
`
`on October 7, 2011 that its representative emailed VoiceBox Technologies the next business day
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 9 of 46 PageID #: 9
`
`to invite VoiceBox to visit Amazon’s offices on October 19, 2011. That meeting was with
`
`Douglas Booms, Amazon’s Vice President of Worldwide Corporate Development, as well as
`
`engineers and product/business development members of Amazon’s devices and digital teams.
`
`The email from Amazon stated that this was “the right audience to discuss [VoiceBox
`
`Technologies’] personal digital assistant and underlying conversational voice technology.” On
`
`information and belief, in addition to Mr. Booms, the following Amazon personnel attended the
`
`meeting: Nick Komorous (Director, Corporate Development), Ian Freed (VP, Amazon Devices),
`
`Greg Hart (VP, Digital), Al Lindsay (Director, Software Engineer), Frederic Deramat (Senior
`
`Principal Engineer), and John Thimsen (Software Developer). On information and belief, another
`
`Amazon engineer from Cupertino attended by teleconference.
`
`27.
`
`Two days after the meeting at Amazon, on Friday October 21, 2011, Amazon’s
`
`Mr. Komorous emailed VoiceBox Technologies and asked to visit the company’s office for a
`
`“deeper dive.” Mr. Komorous requested that this meeting occur the very next week. VoiceBox
`
`Technologies agreed to host Amazon’s personnel for a meeting at VoiceBox Technologies’ office
`
`on October 26, 2011. On information and belief, from Amazon, Marcello Typrin (Product
`
`Management / Business Development), Frederic Deramat (Senior Principal Engineer), John
`
`Thimsen (Software Developer), and Sean Fitz (Software Developer) joined Mr. Komorous at the
`
`meeting.
`
`28.
`
`In advance of the meeting, Mr. Komorous sent a detailed set of technical
`
`questions that would help Amazon’s “tech team understand the scope and [r]ange of things
`
`[Amazon] can try to tackle with VoiceBox[] as a partner.” Mr. Komorous also indicated that
`
`Amazon’s culture was “engineering heavy” and asked that VoiceBox Technologies “have
`
`engineering and speech representation at the meeting.”
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 10 of 46 PageID #: 10
`
`29.
`
`The October 26, 2011 meeting at VoiceBox Technologies’ office ran from 10 am
`
`until 12 noon with some Amazon engineers staying even later until around 2:30 pm. The meeting
`
`included a tour with additional demos, a review of the technical architecture for VoiceBox
`
`Technologies’ server software, and plans for next generation products.
`
`30.
`
`During the meeting, VoiceBox Technologies presented a deck of 42 slides to the
`
`visiting Amazon personnel. The slides provided even more detail about VoiceBox Technologies’
`
`patented technology and informed Amazon that VoiceBox Technologies had 12 patents at the
`
`time with an additional 14 pending applications. The slide deck included the following slide
`
`regarding the ’176 patent, which is asserted in this lawsuit.
`
`Figure 6: Slide from 2011 Presentation
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 11 of 46 PageID #: 11
`
`31.
`
`The slide deck VoiceBox Technologies presented to Amazon at the October 26,
`
`2011 meeting also proposed a business arrangement where VoiceBox Technologies would
`
`provide “Voice Services” to Amazon. The VoiceBox Technologies Voice Services from the
`
`presentation are shown below:
`
`Figure 7: Slide from 2011 Presentation
`
`32.
`
`On information and belief, some of the Amazon personnel involved in the 2011
`
`meetings became technical leaders for Amazon’s Alexa Products while others became high-level
`
`executives with close working relationships with the senior leadership of Amazon. On
`
`information and belief, one of Mr. Freed’s past positions was Technical Advisor to CEO, a
`
`position that has been described as CEO Jeff Bezos’s “shadow” advisor. On information and
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 12 of 46 PageID #: 12
`
`belief, Mr. Freed then went on to become Vice President, Amazon Devices where he led a team
`
`of engineers working on Amazon’s Alexa Products. On information and belief, Mr. Hart has also
`
`been Mr. Bezos’s “shadow” advisor—he held the Technical Advisor to CEO position around
`
`2011. On information and belief, around 2011, Al Lindsey was promoted to Vice President
`
`managing the Alexa Engine Software team. On information and belief, around 2011, Mr.
`
`Deramat was promoted to the position Vice President & Distinguished Engineer for Amazon
`
`Alexa. On information and belief, around 2011, Mr. Thimsen was promoted to the position
`
`Director of Engineering for Amazon Echo. As for Mr. Typrin, he states on his LinkedIn page that
`
`he is “[o]ne of the founding members of the team that shaped the vision and direction for
`
`Amazon's Echo and Alexa Voice Services.”
`
`33.
`
`A couple days after the last meeting in 2011, VoiceBox Technologies sent an
`
`email to Amazon asking for Amazon’s feedback. Mr. Komorous from Amazon replied that
`
`Amazon was “still discussing internally how contextual speech / cybermind 2012 could play a
`
`part in [Amazon’s] future.” Amazon did not provide the results of these discussions and did not
`
`pursue a business relationship with VoiceBox Technologies. Instead, on information and belief,
`
`Amazon decided to build its Alexa Products—without telling VoiceBox Technologies or asking
`
`permission to use VoiceBox Technologies’ patented technology.
`
`34.
`
`In 2014, Amazon announced the launch of Alexa, a virtual assistant, along with
`
`the first-generation Echo product, a smart speaker. Amazon’s Alexa and first-generation Echo
`
`product were strikingly similar to the patented technology that VoiceBox Technologies showed
`
`Amazon in 2011.
`
`35.
`
`In 2016, Amazon abruptly hired Philippe Di Cristo, who was VoiceBox
`
`Technologies’ Chief Scientist. While at VoiceBox Technologies, Mr. Di Cristo gained knowledge
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 13 of 46 PageID #: 13
`
`of the company’s voice technology and had full access to VoiceBox Technologies’ intellectual
`
`property. As Mr. Di Cristo explains on his LinkedIn Page, he had worked on an “Amazon Echo-
`
`like system” while at VoiceBox Technologies. Exhibit A at 3. On information and belief, Mr. Di
`
`Cristo has helped design and implement VoiceBox Technologies’ patented technology into
`
`Amazon’s Echo and other Alexa Products.
`
`36.
`
`On information and belief, Mr. Di Cristo played an active role in soliciting
`
`additional VoiceBox employees to join Amazon. For example, shortly after Mr. Di Cristo joined
`
`Amazon from VoiceBox Technologies, Amazon ramped-up its efforts to recruit VoiceBox
`
`Technologies employees.
`
`37.
`
`On January 10, 2017, Amazon hosted an “Evening with the Leadership of
`
`Amazon Voice & Advanced Shopping,” which Amazon expressly described as an “invite only
`
`networking event for Voice Box employees . . . to talk . . . about opportunities at Amazon.” The
`
`director of Amazon’s Voice & Advanced NUI Shopping group— on information and belief, the
`
`group Mr. Di Cristo joined—sent an invite for the event to a large number of VoiceBox
`
`Technologies employees and indicated that Amazon was “building a world-class speech & NLU
`
`engineering team” and “[y]our profile looks quite relevant and we’d love to talk to you and see if
`
`there’s a fit.” For this event, Amazon rented out Seastar, the premier seafood restaurant near
`
`VoiceBox Technologies’ office.
`
`38.
`
`On information and belief, Mr. Di Cristo was originally scheduled to be a speaker
`
`at the event targeting VoiceBox Technologies employees—but abruptly withdrew. The event
`
`emphasized Amazon’s need for VoiceBox Technologies’ NLU technology. On information and
`
`belief, around this time, Amazon faced numerous NLU challenges and had only completed a
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 14 of 46 PageID #: 14
`
`small portion of work toward Amazon’s goal to build conversational dialog interaction into
`
`Alexa Products.
`
`39.
`
`On January 17, 2017, after Amazon’s rampant poaching of VoiceBox
`
`Technologies employees came to light, Mike Kennewick, CEO of VoiceBox Technologies, sent a
`
`letter to Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon, to propose a business solution. A true and correct copy of
`
`that letter is attached as Exhibit B. The letter explains that, at the time, VoiceBox Technologies
`
`had “a deep portfolio of technology and IP, including a large number of significant patents not
`
`only in NLU but also in Voice[]Commerce, running on over 200 million devices.”
`
`40.
`
`On information and belief, Mr. Booms, Amazon’s Vice President of Worldwide
`
`Corporate Development, responded to VoiceBox Technologies’ January 17, 2017 letter on behalf
`
`of Mr. Bezos. In Amazon’s response, Mr. Booms requested a meeting at VoiceBox Technologies’
`
`offices for purposes of “go[ing] fairly deep on the technology, data, customer relationships.”
`
`41.
`
`On February 2, 2017, the parties met at VoiceBox Technologies’ office. Amazon
`
`came with a team of technologists from its Alexa program, including on information and belief,
`
`Manoj Sindhwani (Director Alexa), Karthik Ramakrishnan (Senior Manager, Alexa software),
`
`Nikko Strom (Scientist, Alexa), and Deepesh Mohnani (Alexa Voice Services Product
`
`Management) joined by Mr. Booms. VoiceBox Technologies provided a detailed technical
`
`presentation, which included information about patents and pending applications then owned by
`
`VoiceBox Technologies. Slides in the presentation listed all VoiceBox Technologies patents and
`
`published applications at the time, including the ’681 patent, the ’049 patent, the ’176 patent, the
`
`’536 patent, and the ’097 patent. The February 2, 2017 slides also reproduced a highlighted claim
`
`from the ’681 patent and a highlighted claim from the ’176 patent.
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 15 of 46 PageID #: 15
`
`42.
`
`Following the meeting, Mr. Booms emailed VoiceBox Technologies to request
`
`even more technical details. Then, on February 20, 2017, Amazon specifically asked VoiceBox
`
`Technologies for a list of all patents owned by the company.
`
`43.
`
`In March of 2017, VoiceBox Technologies hosted another meeting with Amazon
`
`personnel at VoiceBox Technologies’ office. The Amazon attendees included senior executives
`
`and managers responsible for Alexa. VoiceBox Technologies informed Amazon by email after
`
`the meeting that VoiceBox Technologies had “[p]atents that could be useful as the market goes
`
`mainstream.” Shortly, thereafter, Mr. Komorous from Amazon emailed VoiceBox Technologies,
`
`writing that Amazon had been “[poring] through the material” VoiceBox Technologies provided
`
`and that Amazon had created yet another, even more detailed, list of requests.
`
`44.
`
`In April of 2017, VoiceBox Technologies shared a written summary of VoiceBox
`
`Technologies’ patent portfolio with Amazon. The written summary explained that VoiceBox
`
`Technologies’ patents covered “core & fundamental areas.” The summary showcased the ’176
`
`patent and the ’703 patent, and identified the ’536 patent and ’097 patent by number. The
`
`summary further explained that “[v]oice advertising & conversational e-commerce are essential
`
`to the core strategies and future revenue streams of many of the world’s leading technology
`
`companies, including: . . . Amazon . . . .”
`
`OVERVIEW OF VOICEBOX’S PATENTS-IN-SUIT
`
`45.
`
`United States Patent Number 8,073,681 (“the ’681 patent”), entitled “System and
`
`Method for a Cooperative Conversational Voice User Interface,” was duly and legally issued on
`
`December 6, 2011, and names Larry Baldwin, Tom Freeman, Michael Tjalve, Blane Ebersold,
`
`and Chris Weider as the inventors. Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the ’681
`
`patent.
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 16 of 46 PageID #: 16
`
`46.
`
`The ’681 patent claims, among other things, a system for providing a cooperative
`
`conversational voice user interface, comprising: a voice input device configured to receive an
`
`utterance during a current conversation with a user; and a conversational speech engine, wherein
`
`the conversational speech engine includes one or more processors configured to: accumulate
`
`short-term shared knowledge about the current conversation, wherein the short-term shared
`
`knowledge includes knowledge about the utterance received during the current conversation;
`
`accumulate long-term shared knowledge about the user, wherein the long-term shared knowledge
`
`includes knowledge about one or more past conversations with the user; identify a context
`
`associated with the utterance from the short-term shared knowledge and the long-term shared
`
`knowledge; infer additional information about the utterance from the short-term shared
`
`knowledge and the long-term shared knowledge in response to determining that the utterance
`
`contains insufficient information to complete a request in the identified context; establish an
`
`intended meaning for the utterance within the identified identify a context based on the
`
`additional information inferred about the utterance; and generate a response to the utterance
`
`based on the intended meaning established within the identified context.
`
`47.
`
`48.
`
`VoiceBox is the assignee of the entire right, title, and interest in the ’681 patent.
`
`United States Patent Number 9,015,049 (“the ’049 patent”), entitled “System and
`
`Method for a Cooperative Conversational Voice User Interface,” was duly and legally issued on
`
`April 21, 2015, and names Larry Baldwin, Tom Freeman, Michael Tjalve, Blane Ebersold, and
`
`Chris Weider as the inventors. Attached as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of the ’049 patent.
`
`49.
`
`The ’049 patent claims, among other things, a system for facilitating
`
`conversation-based responses, the system comprising: one or more physical processors
`
`programmed with one or more computer program instructions such that, when executed, the one
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 17 of 46 PageID #: 17
`
`or more computer program instructions cause the one or more physical processors to: receive a
`
`natural language utterance during a conversation between a user and the system; identify a first
`
`model that includes short-term knowledge about the conversation, wherein the short-term
`
`knowledge is based on one or more prior natural language utterances received during the
`
`conversation; identify, based on the short-term knowledge, context information for the natural
`
`language utterance; determine, based on the context information, an interpretation of the natural
`
`language utterance; and generate, based on the interpretation of the natural language utterance, a
`
`response to the natural language utterance.
`
`50.
`
`51.
`
`VoiceBox is the assignee of the entire right, title, and interest in the ’049 patent.
`
`United States Patent Number 9,626,703 (“the ’703 patent”), entitled “Voice
`
`Commerce,” was duly and legally issued on April 18, 2017, and names Michael R. Kennewick,
`
`Sr. as the inventor. Attached as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of the ’703 patent.
`
`52.
`
`The ’703 patent claims, among other things, a system for providing voice
`
`commerce, the system comprising: one or more physical processors programmed with computer
`
`program instructions which, when executed, cause the one or more physical processors to:
`
`receive a user input comprising a natural language utterance; provide, without further user input
`
`after the receipt of the user input, the natural language utterance as an input to a speech
`
`recognition engine; obtain, without further user input after the receipt of the user input, one or
`
`more words or phrases recognized from the natural language utterance as an output of the speech
`
`recognition engine; identify, without further user input after the receipt of the user input, a
`
`context based at least on the one or more words or phrases; determine, without further user input
`
`identifying a product or service after the receipt of the user input, a first product or service to be
`
`purchased on behalf of a user based at least on the determined context; obtain, without further
`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 18 of 46 PageID #: 18
`
`user input identifying payment information after the receipt of the user input, first payment
`
`information with which to pay for the product or service; obtain, without further user input
`
`identifying shipping information after the receipt of the user input, first shipping information
`
`with which to deliver the product or service, wherein the first shipping information specifies a
`
`name or address of a recipient to which the product or service is to be delivered after the product
`
`or service is purchased; and complete, without further user input identifying a product or service,
`
`payment information, or shipping information after the receipt of the user input, a purchase
`
`transaction for the first product or service based on the first payment information and the first
`
`shipping information.
`
`53.
`
`54.
`
`VoiceBox is the assignee of the entire right, title, and interest in the ’703 patent.
`
`United States Patent Number 7,818,176 (“the ’176 patent”), entitled “System and
`
`Method for Selecting and Presenting Advertisements Based on Natural Language Processing of
`
`Voice-based Input,” was duly and legally issued on October 19, 2010, and names Tom Freeman
`
`and Mike Kennewick as the inventors. Attached as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of the
`
`’176 patent.
`
`55.
`
`The ’176 patent claims, among other things, a system for selecting and presenting
`
`advertisements in response to processing natural language utterances, comprising: an input
`
`device that receives a natural language utterance containing at least one request at an input
`
`device; a speech recognition engine coupled to the input device, wherein the speech recognition
`
`engine recognizes one or more words or phrases in the natural language utterance, wherein to
`
`recognize the words or phrases in the natural language utterance, the speech recognition engine
`
`is configured to: map a stream of phonemes contained in the natural language utterance to one or
`
`more syllables that are phonemically represented in an acoustic grammar; and generate a
`
`18
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-01410-MN Document 1 Filed 07/29/19 Page 19 of 46 PageID #: 19
`
`preliminary interpretation for the natural language utterance from the one or more syllables,
`
`wherein the preliminary interpretation generated from the one or more syllables includes the
`
`recognized words or phrases; a conversational language processor coupled to the speech
`
`recognition engine, wherein the conversational language processor is configured to: interpret the
`
`recognized words or phrases, wherein interpreting the recognized words or phrases includes
`
`establishing a context for the natural language utterance; select an advertisement in the context
`
`established for the natural language utterance; and present the selected advertisement via an
`
`output device.
`
`56.
`
`57.
`
`VoiceBox is the assignee of the entire right, title, and interest in the ’176 patent.
`
`United States Patent Number 8,886,536 (“the ’536 patent”), entitled “System and
`
`Method for Delivering Targeted Advertisements and Tracking Advertisement Interactions in
`
`Voice Recognition Contexts,” was duly and legally issued on November 11, 2014, and names
`
`Tom Freeman and Mike Kenn[e]wick as the inventors. Attached as Exhibit K is a true and
`
`correct copy of the ’536 patent.
`
`58.
`
`The ’536 patent claims, among other things, a computer-implemented method of
`
`providing promotional content related to one or more natural language utterances and/or
`
`responses, the method being implemented by a computer system that includes one or more
`
`physical processors executing one or more computer program instructions which, when
`
`executed, perform the method, the method comprising: receiving, at the one or more physical
`
`processors, a first natural language utterance; providing, by the one or more physical processors,
`
`a response to the first natural language utterance; receiving, at the one or more physical
`
`processors, a second natural language utterance relating to the first natural language utterance;
`
`identifying, by the one or more physical processors, requests associated with the second natural
`
`19
`
`

`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket