`Case 1:19-cv-00964-CFC-CJB Document 70 Filed 01/13/20 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 1264
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`Civ. No. 19-660-CFC/CJB
`
`) ) ) ) ) ) )
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`) ) ) ) )
`
`SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS
`
`LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`WALMART INC. and VUDU, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS
`
`LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`) Civ. No. 19—964-CFC/CJB
`
`) ) ) ) )
`
`’
`
`) O
`
`RDER
`
`CIGNA CORPORATION and
`
`CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE
`
`INSURANCE COMPANY,
`
`Defendants.
`
`At Wilmington this 13th day of January, 2020, having considered the Report
`
`and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Christopher J.
`
`Burke on December 23, 2019, and upon the expiration of the time allowed for
`
`objections pursuant to Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure with no
`
`objections having been filed;
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00964-CFC-CJB Document 70 Filed 01/13/20 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 1265
`Case 1:19-cv-00964-CFC-CJB Document 70 Filed 01/13/20 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #: 1265
`
`IT IS ORDERED that:
`
`1. Magistrate Judge Burke’s Report and Recommendation (D.I. 62 in Civil
`
`Action No. 19-660 and DJ. 64 in Civil Action No. 19-964) is adopted.
`2. Defendants’ motions to dismiss (D.I. 10 in Civil Action No. 19-660, D.I.
`
`12 in Civil Action No. 19-964) are denied as to the issue of collateral estoppel.
`
`3.
`
`The Walmart Action and the Cigna Action are stayed with respect to
`
`the ‘062 patent, pending the resolution of the appellate process as to the Hulu
`
`Order (or absent fmther order of the Court).
`
`4. The Cigna Action is stayed with respect to the ‘371 patent pending
`
`resolution of the appeal of the PTAB Decisions at the Federal Circuit (or absent
`
`further order of the Court).
`
`6%?
`
`United States Distr'
`
`Judge
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
