`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 19-638-CFC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GENENTECH, INC. and CITY OF HOPE,
`
`
`Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`PFIZER INC.,
`
`
`Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff.
`PFIZER INC.,
`
`
`Counterclaim Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE, INC.,
`
`
`Counterclaim Defendant.
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
`
`This stipulation is made by and between Plaintiffs Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope
`
`
`
`(collectively, “Plaintiffs”), Defendant Pfizer Inc. (“Defendant”), and Counterclaim Defendant
`
`Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. (all collectively, “the Parties”).
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendant have asserted various claims and counterclaims in
`
`the above-captioned case; and
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into a settlement agreement, and mutually agree to
`
`voluntarily dismiss all claims and counterclaims asserted in the above-captioned case without
`
`prejudice;
`
`
`
`
`
`NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY JOINTLY STIPULATED by the Parties that:
`
`1.
`
`Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), all claims,
`
`counterclaims, and demands asserted in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed without
`
`prejudice; and
`
`
`ME1 31482277v.1
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00638-CFC Document 36 Filed 09/19/19 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 1677
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2.
`
`Each party will bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs with respect to the above-
`
`captioned case.
`
`
`ME1 31482277v.1
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00638-CFC Document 36 Filed 09/19/19 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 1678
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: September 19, 2019
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`MCCARTER & ENGLISH LLP
`
`
`
`/s/ Daniel M. Silver
`Michael P. Kelly (# 2295)
`Daniel M. Silver (# 4758)
`Alexandra M. Joyce (# 6423)
`Renaissance Centre
`405 N. King Street, 8th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Tel.: (302) 984-6300
`Fax: (302) 984-6399
`mkelly@mccarter.com
`dsilver@mccarter.com
`ajoyce@mccarter.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counterclaim
`Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope
`and Counterclaim Defendant
`Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.
`
`OF COUNSEL
`
`Christopher N. Sipes
`Megan P. Keane
`Philip S. May
`Allison A. Schmitt
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`One CityCenter
`850 Tenth Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`(202) 662-6000
`
`Alexa R. Hansen
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`Salesforce Tower
`415 Mission Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`(415) 591-6000
`
`Andrew Regan
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`3000 El Camino Real
`5 Palo Alto Square, 10th Floor
`Palo Alto, CA 94306
`(650) 632-4700
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ME1 31482277v.1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HEYMAN ENERIO GATTUSO & HIRZEL LLP
`
`
`
`/s/ Dominick T. Gattuso
`Dominick T. Gattuso (# 3630)
`300 Delaware Avenue, Suite 200
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Tel.: (302) 472-7300
`dgattuso@hegh.law
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Pfizer Inc.
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Thomas J. Meloro
`Michael W. Johnson
`Dan Constantinescu
`WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP
`787 Seventh Avenue
`New York, NY 10019
`(212) 728-8000
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00638-CFC Document 36 Filed 09/19/19 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 1679
`
`
`
`Mary Swears
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`The New York Times Building
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, NY 10018
`(212) 841-1000
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant
`Genentech, Inc. and Counterclaim Defendant
`Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Daralyn J. Durie
`Adam R. Brausa
`Eric C. Wiener
`Eneda Hoxha
`DURIE TANGRI LLP
`217 Leidesdorff Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`(415) 362-6666
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Counterclaim
`Defendants Genentech, Inc. and City of Hope
`and Counterclaim Defendant
`Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED: ______________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_____________________________________
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`ME1 31482277v.1
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
