throbber
Case 1:19-cv-00187-RGA Document 12 Filed 05/10/19 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 61
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`GUADA TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
` CASE NO. 19-cv-187-RGA
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
` PATENT CASE
`
`
`
`
`
`UNCOMMONGOODS, LLC,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIMS OF UNCOMMONGOODS, LLC
`
`Plaintiff Guada Technologies LLC hereby answers the counterclaims (Dkt. No. 10) of
`
`Uncommongoods, LLC (“Defendant”), by corresponding paragraph number as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Guada Technologies admits that Defendant filed an action for declaratory
`
`judgment of non-infringement, invalidity and unenforceability, as related to U.S. Patent Nos.
`
`7,231,379 (“the ’379 patent”) pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-
`
`2202, and the United States Patent Law, 35 U.S.C. § 100 et seq.; however, Guada Technologies
`
`denies that Defendant is entitled to any declaratory judgment or any other relief.
`
`
`
`I. THE PARTIES
`
`2.
`
`Guada Technologies admits that Uncommongoods, LLC is a Delaware limited
`
`liability company. Guada Technologies is without knowledge or information sufficient to form a
`
`belief as to the remaining allegations and therefore denies all other allegations.
`
`3.
`
`Admitted.
`
`4.
`
`Admitted.
`
`II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-00187-RGA Document 12 Filed 05/10/19 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 62
`
`5.
`
`Guada Technologies admits that venue and personal jurisdiction is proper in this
`
`District for Defendant’s counterclaims because Guada Technologies filed its complaint in this
`
`District. Guada Technologies denies all other allegations in the paragraph.
`
`DEFENDANT’S III. COUNT 1: DECLARATORY OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF U.S.
`PATENT NO. 7,231,379
`
`6.
`
`Guada Technologies incorporates by reference its responses to paragraphs 1
`
`through 5 above, as if fully set forth herein.
`
`7.
`
`Guada Technologies admits that Defendant seeks a declaratory judgment
`
`declaring the rights and interest of Defendant and Plaintiff in connection with non-infringement
`
`of the ‘379 patent; however, Guada Technologies denies that Defendant is entitled to such a
`
`declaration or any other relief. Guada Technologies denies all other allegations in the paragraph.
`
`DEFENDANT’S IV. COUNT 2: DECLARATORY OF INVALIDITY OF U.S.
`PATENT NO. 7,231,379
`
`8.
`
`Guada Technologies incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 7 above, as if
`
`fully set forth herein.
`
`9.
`
`Guada Technologies admits that Defendant seeks a declaratory judgment
`
`declaring the rights and interest of Defendant and Plaintiff in connection with the invalidity and
`
`unenforceability of the ‘379 patent; however, Guada Technologies denies that Defendant is
`
`entitled to such a declaration or any other relief. Guada Technologies denies all other allegations
`
`in the paragraph.
`
`10.
`
` Guada Technologies admits that Defendant seeks a declaratory judgment
`
`declaring the claims of the ‘379 patent are invalid because they purport to patent an abstract idea
`
`and are ineligible for patentability under 35 U.S.C. §101; however, Guada Technologies denies
`
`that Defendant is entitled to such a declaration or any other relief. Guada Technologies denies
`
`all other allegations in the paragraph.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-00187-RGA Document 12 Filed 05/10/19 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 63
`
`11.
`
`Guada Technologies admits that Defendant seeks a declaratory judgment
`
`declaring that the ‘379 patent invalid under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and/or 103 in light of the teachings
`
`of at least the following prior references: U.S. Patent No. 6,731,724 to Wesemann et al.; U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,366,910 to Rajarman et al.; and U.S. Patent No. 7,539,656 to Fratkina et al.;
`
`however, Guada Technologies denies that Defendant is entitled to such a declaration or any other
`
`relief. Guada Technologies denies all other allegations in the paragraph.
`
`DEFENDANT’S V. DEMAND FOR A JURY TRIAL
`
`12.
`
`Defendant’s jury demand is an averment to which no response is required.
`
`DEFENDANT’S VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF AS TO COUNTERCLAIMS
`
`Guada Technologies denies that Defendant is entitled to any relief, including the relief
`
`requested in its Prayer for Relief.
`
`
`May 10, 2019
`
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`David R. Bennett
`Direction IP Law
`P.O. Box 14184
`Chicago, IL 60614-0184
`(312) 291-1667
`dbennett@directionip.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`DEVLIN LAW FIRM LLC
`
` /s/ Timothy Devlin
`Timothy Devlin
`Delaware Bar No. 4241
`1306 N. Broom Street, 1st Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19806
`Phone: (302) 449-9010
`tdevlin@devlinlawfirm.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`GUADA TECHNOLOGIES LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:19-cv-00187-RGA Document 12 Filed 05/10/19 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 64
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on May 10, 2019, I electronically filed the above documents with
`
`the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF which will send electronic notification of such filings to all
`
`registered counsel.
`
`/s/ Timothy Devlin
`Timothy Devlin (#4241)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket