`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 681 PagelD #: 870
`
`EXHIBIT V
`EXHIBIT V
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 2 of 681 PageID #: 871
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Taal
` inna
`
`
`
`US 009428548B2
`
`(12) United States Patent
`US 9,428,548 B2
`(10) Patent No.:
`Aug. 30, 2016
`(45) Date of Patent:
`Brown et al.
`
`(54)
`
`(75)
`
`ENHANCED PROTEIN PURIFICATION
`THROUGH A MODIFIED PROTEIN A
`ELUTION
`
`Inventors: Arick Brown, South San Francisco, CA
`(US): Christopher J. Dowd. South San
`Francisco, CA (US); Asha Nandini
`Radhamohan, South San Fracisco, CA
`(US)
`
`2/1998 Robinson et al.
`5,721,108. A
`31998 Hudziak et al.
`5,725,856 A
`4/1998 Anderson etal.
`5,736,137 A
`2/2006 Jiao et al.
`2006'0039901 Al
`3/2007 Godavarti et al
`2007/0072307 Al
`7/2008 Lindner et al,
`2008/0164211 Al
`7/2008 Pan
`20080167450 Al
`8/2008 Fahrner et al,
`2008/0193981 Al
`2010/0331527 Al* 12/2010 Davis et al.
`............... §30/387.3
`
`POREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`(73)
`
`Assignee:
`
`Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco,
`CA (US)
`
`Appl. No.:
`
`13/393,525
`
`PCT Piled:
`
`Sep. 1, 2010
`
`PCT No::
`
`PCT/US2010/047448
`
`6/ L986
`0 183 070 A2
`EP
`O/L9RG6
`0.183 070 A3
`EP
`EP
`0 1835 070 Bl
`6/1986
`EP
`0 244 234 A2
`[1/1987
`Notice:—Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`FP
`0 244 234 AS
`LL/L9R7
`patent
`is extended or adjusted under 35
`EP
`0 244 234 BI
`LL/1987
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 547 days.
`EP
`0 244 234 B2
`1L/1987
`EP
`0 308 936 A?
`3/1989
`EP
`0308 936 A3
`3/1989
`EP
`0 3508 936 Bl
`3/1989
`EP
`0 402 226 Al
`12/1990
`EP
`0 420 397 BI
`4/199]
`RU
`21456)0 Cl
`2/2000
`Wo
`S7/00195 Al
`{/1987
`Wo
`90/03430 Al
`4/1990)
`wo
`91}/00360 Al
`1/199]
`Wo
`92/20373. Al
`(1/1992
`Wo
`93/04173 Al
`3/1993
`wo
`93/08829 Al
`5/1993
`WO
`95/1918) Al
`7/1995
`wo
`92/23865 Al
`9/1995
`Wo
`96/2701) Al
`1996
`Wo
`96/30046 Al
`10/1996
`Wo
`96/40210 Al
`12/1996
`wo
`97/26912 A2
`7/1997
`WO
`97/26912 A3
`T1997
`
`§ 371 (c)Q),
`(2). (4) Date:
`
`Jul, 16, 2012
`
`PCT Pub. No.: WO2011/028753
`
`PCT Pub. Date: Mar. 10, 2011
`
`Prior Publication Data
`
`US 2013/0041139 Al
`
`Feb, 14, 2013
`
`(87)
`
`(65)
`
`(60)
`
`(51)
`
`(52)
`
`(58)
`
`(56)
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`Provisional application No. 61/238,867, filed on Sep.
`1, 2009, provisional application No, 61/253,438,filed
`on Oct. 20, 2009.
`
`(2006.01 )
`
`tnt. Ch
`CO7K 1/22
`U.S. Cl.
`EPS Aavpiekdaeerteiepestecrsemnn seca! OAR TZ22 (O18 OT}
`Field of Classification Search
`None
`See application file for complete search history,
`
`References Cited
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`RE30.985 E
`4,515,893 A
`4,560,655 A
`4,657,566 A
`4,676,980 A
`4,767,704 A
`4816,567 A
`4,927,762 A
`5.091.178 A
`S091313 A
`5,122,469 A
`5,434,615 A
`$622,700 A
`3,672,347 A
`5,693,762 A
`5.714.338 A
`
`6/1982 Cartaya
`§/1985 Kungetal.
`12/1985 Baker
`4/1987 Kumar
`6/1987 Segalet al.
`8/1988 Clevelandet al,
`3/1989 Cabilly et al.
`§/1990 Darfler
`2/1992 Hellstromet al,
`2/1992 Chang
`6/1992 Mather et al.
`7/1996 Baker et al,
`4/1997 Jardieu et al,
`9/1997 Aggarwal et al.
`12/1997 Queen et al,
`2/1998 Wai Fei et al.
`
`(Continued)
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Hows et al. “High-performance liquid chromatographytandem
`mass spectrometry assay for the rapid high sensitivity measurement
`of basal acetylcholine from microdialysates” J. Nueroscience meth-
`ods [21], (2002) 33-39."
`Fahrner etal. “Industrial purification of pharmaceutical antibodies:
`development, operation, and validation of chromatography pro-
`cesses”, Biotechnology and Genetic Engineeering Reviews. Jul, 18,
`2001, pp. 301-327.
`Fahrneret al. “Industrial Purificaiton of Pharmaceutical Antibodies:
`development. operation, and validation of chromatography pro-
`cesses” Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews, 18, 2001.
`pp. 301-327,"
`Arulfo et al. “CD44 is the Principal Cell Surface Receptor for
`Iyaluronate” Cel! 6):1303-1313 (Jun, 29, 1990).
`Barnes and Sato, “Methods for Growth of Cultured Cells in Serum-
`Free Medium” Analytical Biochem, 102;255-270 (1980).
`(Continued)
`
`Primary Examiner — Daniel E Kolker
`Assistant Examiner — James Rogers
`(74) Atterney, Agent, or Firm — Morrison & Foerster LLP
`
`(37)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`invention provides methods for purifying 4
`The present
`polypeptide comprising a CH2/CH3 region, comprising
`binding the polypeptide to Proiein A and eluting with a pH
`gradient starting al a low pH.
`
`73 Claims, 21 Drawing Sheets
`
`
`
`WO
`Wo
`WO
`WoO
`Wo
`wo
`WO
`wo
`WO
`WO
`WO
`Wo
`wo
`WoO
`wo
`WO
`WO
`
`9806248 AD
`98/06248 A3
`98/23761 Al
`OR/4533L A2
`O8/45331 AS
`98/51793 AL
`99/01556 A2
`99/O1556 Ad
`OO/7S348 Al
`OO/FS348 Cl
`01/00245 A2
`01/00245 AS
`0140309 A2
`0140309 AS
`0140309 Cl
`2008/025747 Al
`WO-2008/085988 Al
`
`2/1998
`2/1998
`6/1998
`10/1998
`10/1998
`IL 1998
`1/1999
`1/1999
`12/2000
`12/2000
`1/2001
`12001
`6/2001
`6/2001
`6/200)
`3/2008
`7/2008
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 3 of 681 PageID #: 872
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 3 of 681 PagelD #: 872
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`Page 2
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`Graham et al., “Charactenstics of a Human Cell Line Transformed
`by DNA From Human Adenoviras Type 5" J. Gen, Virol. 36(1):59-
`72 (Jul. 1977).
`Gravianoet al., “Construction and Charactenzation of a Humanized
`Anti-y-lg Reeeptor ‘Type
`|
`(PeyRI) Monoclonal Antibody” |/.
`Jmmunol, 155;4996-5002 (1995).
`Gruber et al., “Eficient Tumor Cell Lysis Mediated by a Bispecific
`Single Chain Antibody ‘Expressed in Escherichia coli J. Jmmunol.
`152:5368-5374 (1994),
`Ham and MeKeehan, “Media and Growth Requirements” Method
`Fnzymol, 58:44-93 (1979).
`Hollinger et al., *“Diabodies”: Small Bivalent and Bispecific Ant-
`body Fragments” Pree, Natl. dead. Sei, USA 90:6444-6448 (Jul,
`1993).
`Hoogenboom et al.. “Constrochon and Expression of Anhbody-
`‘Tumor Necrosis Factor Fusion :Proteins” Molecular Immunology
`28(9) 1027-1037 (1991).
`Hoogenboom et al. “By-Passing Immunisation. Human Antibodies
`From Synthehe Repertoires of Germline V,, Gene Segments Rear-
`ranged in Vitro" J, Mol. Bial, 227;381-388 (1992),
`Hourmant et al, “Admimstration of an Ant-CD1la Monoclonal
`Antibody in Recipients of Kidney Transplantation” Transplantation
`Berg et al.. “Bispecific Antibodies That Mediate Killing of Cells
`S58(3):377-380 (Ang, 1994).
`Infected With Haman Immunodeficiency Virus of Any Strain” Proe,
`Jakobovits et al., “Analysis of Homozygous Motant Chimene Mice:
`Natl. Acad. Sei. USA 88:4723-4727 (Jun. (991).
`Deletion of the Inimunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Joining Region
`Brennan et al., “Preparation of Biospecific Antibodies by Chemical
`Blocks B-cell Development and Antibody Production” Proce, Natl.
`Recombination of Monoclonal
`Immunoglobulin GI Fragments”
`Acad. Sei, (SA 90(6):.2551-2555 (Mar. 15, 1993).
`Science 2294708 ):81-83 (Jul. 5, 1985).
`Jakebovits et al., “Germ-line Transmission and Expression of a
`Brodeur et al. Monoclonal Antibody Production Techniques and
`
`Human-Derived Chromosome"=Nature‘Yeast Artificial
`
`
`Applications, Lawrence B, Schook, New York: Marcel Dekker,
`362(6417):255-258 (Mar. 18, 1993).
`Inc.,:55-63 (1987).
`Jones et al, “Replacing the Complementarity-Determining Regions
`Brown et al., “Increasing Parvovirus Filter Throughput of Mono-
`in a Human Antbody with Those From a Mouse" Nature
`clonal Anbbodies Lising lon Exchange Membrane Adsorptive Pre-
`321(6069);522-525 (May 29, 1986).
`Filtration” Biotechnol, Bioeng. ()6(4)\627-637 (2010),
`Joreic et al., “Radiolabeled Anti-CD33 Monoclonal Antibody MJ95
`Bruggermann et al., “Designer Mice: The Production of Human
`for Myeloid Leukemias” Cancer Research 535:5908s-59 10s (Dec. 1.
`Anhbody Repertoires in Transgeme Animals” Year Imai7:33-40
`L995).
`(1993).
`Joweid et al, “Treatment of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma with
`Carter et al., “High Lever Escherichia coli Expression and Produc-
`Radiolabeled Murine, Chimene, or Humanized LI.2, an Anti-CD22
`Gon of a Bivalent Humanized Antibody Fragment” BieTech
`10:163-167 (Feb. 1992),
`Monoclonal Antibody,” Cancer Res. 55(23 Supp.):5899s-5907s,
`(Dee,
`|, 1995).
`Carter ef al., “Humanization of an Anti-p185/"" Antibody for
`Kim et al. et al., “The Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Proteins:
`Human Cancer Therapy” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci, USA $9:A285-4289
`(May 1997),
`Identification of Biologically Relevant Regions by Neutralizing
`Monoclonal Antibodies” Growl Pactors7:53-64 (1992),
`Ceniani et al,, “Biological Activity of Two Humanized Antibodies
`Against ‘Two Different Breast Cancer Antigens and Comparison to
`Kohler and Milstein, “Continnous Cultures of Fused Cells Secreting
`Their Orginal Munne Forms" Cancer Research 55(23);5852s-
`Antibody of Predefined Specificity” Natmre 256:495-497 (Ang. 7,
`1975).
`$8465 (1995).
`Chamow et al, “A Homanized, Bispecific [nimunoadhesin-Anti-
`Kostelny et al., “Formation of a Bispecific Antibody by the use of
`body That Retargets CD3*Effectors to Kill HIV-1-Infected Cells” /
`Leucine Zippers” J.
`/mmuarol, -148(5):1547-1553 (Mar. 1, 1992).
`Kozboretal.,“A Human Hybrid Myelomafor Production of Human
`J/mmunel 1S3(9VA2684280 (Noy, 1, 1994).
`Monoclonal Antibodies” Jmmunal 133(6):4001-3005 (Dec. 1984),
`Choy et al., “Percentage of Anti-CD4 Monoclonal Antibody-Coated
`Lymphocytes in the Rheumatoid Joint is Associated with Clinical
`Le Doussal et al, “In Vitro and In Vivo Targeting of Radiolabeled
`Improvement” Arthritis Rheum, 39:52-56 (1996),
`Monovalent and Divalent Haptens with Dual Specificity Monoclo-
`nal Antibody Conjogales; Enhanced Divalent Hapten Affinity for
`Clackson et al.. “Making Anhibody Fragments Using Phage Display
`Cell-Bound Antibody Conjugate”. Nuel, Med, 30:1358-1366 (
`Libranes” Nanire 352:624-628 (Aug. 15, 1991),
`1989),
`de Wit et al., “Real-Time Quanttahve PCR for Retrovirus-Like
`Particle Quantification in CHO Cell Culture” Biologicals 28:137-
`Lindmark et al.. “Binding of Inimunoglobulins to Protein A and
`148 (2000),
`Immunoglobulin Levels in Mammalian Sera” J. Jinmonol. Methods
`621-13 (1983)
`Dhainaut et al, “CDPS71, a Humanized Anubody to Human Tumor
`Necrosis Factor—c; Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Immune Response.
`Litton et al. “Annbody-Targeted Superantigen Therapy Induces
`Tomor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes, Excessive Cytokine Production,
`and Influence of the Antibody of Cytokine Concentrations in
`Patients with Sephe Shock" Crit, Care Med. 23(9):1461-1469
`and Apoptosis in Human Colon Carcinoma” Eurpoean Journal of
`Jmmuinology 26:1-9 (1996).
`(1995),
`Duachosal et al, “Immunization of ho-PBL-SCID Mice and the
`Lorenz, H. et al., “In Vivo Blockade of TNE-ciby Intravenous
`Rescue of Human Monoclonal Fab Fragments Through Combinato-
`Infusion of a Cioamenc Monoclonal TNF-ct Antibody in Patents
`nal Libranes” Nature 355(6357).258-262 (Jan. 16, 1992).
`with Rheumatoid Arthritis" J. Jotmurel, 156;1646-1653 (1996),
`Marks et al., “By-Passing Immunization. Haman Antibodies From
`Ellis et al, “Engineered Anfi-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies for
`Immunotherapy of Multiple Myeloma," /. Jmmunel. 155(2):925-
`V-Gene Libranes Displayed on Phage” J. Mol. Biol, 222:581-597
`937, (Jul, 15, 1995).
`(1991).
`Marks et al, “By-Passing Intmumization: Building [igh Affimty
`Goding, Monoclonal Antibodies; Principles and Practice “Produc-
`Homan Antibodies by (Chain Shoffling” Bio/Technolagy 10:779-
`tion and Application of Monoclonal Antibodies in Cell Biology,
`783 (Jul, 1992),
`Biochemistry and Immunology” Academic Press, 56-103 (1986),
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 4 of 681 PageID #: 873
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 4 of 681 PagelD #: 873
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`Page 3
`
`(36)
`
`References Cited
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Mather, “Establishment and Characterization of Two Distinet
`Monse Testicolar Epithelial Cell Lines” Biol, Reprod. 23:243-252
`(1980).
`McCaffertyet al., “Phage Antibodies: Filamentous Phage Display-
`ing Antibody Variable Domain” Nature 348:552-554 (Dec. 1990),
`Millstein
`et
`al,
`“Hybrid Mybridomas
`and Their
`use
`in
`Immunghistochemistry” Nature 305,537-539 (1983),
`Morimoto and Inouye. “Single-Step Purification of F(ab’), Frag-
`ments of Mouse Monoclonal Antibodies (Immunoglobulins G1) by
`Hydrophobic Interaction High Performance Liquid Chromatogra-
`phy Using TSKgel phenyl-SPW" J. Biochem. Bioplys. Meth.
`24; 107-117 (1992),
`Morrison et al., “Chimeric Human Antibody Molecules: Mouse
`Antigen-Binding Domains with Human Constant Region Domains”
`Proe, Natl. Acad. Sci. U'SA $1:6851-6855 (Nov, 1984),
`Presta, “Antibody Engineering” Curr, Opin. Struc. Biol, 2:593-596
`( 1992).
`Presta et al., “Humanization of an Antibody Directed Against igh”
`J. Immunol, 151(5):2623-2632 (Sep. 1, 1993).
`Reeny et al., “N-Glycosylation is Required for Human CD2
`Immnanoadhesion Functions” J. Biel, Chem, 267(31):428-434 (Nov.
`5, 1992),
`Riechmann et al. “Reshaping Human Antibodies for Therapy”
`Nattire 332:323-327 (Mar, 24, 1988),
`Richman et al., “Radioimmunotherapy for Breast Cancer Using
`Escalating Fractionated Doses of |"! [-Labeled Chimeric L6 Anti-
`body With Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell ‘Transfusions” Cancer
`Research 55(23 Suppl):5 L6s-5920s (1995),
`Shalaby et al., “Development of Humanized Bispecitie Antibodies
`Reactive With Cytotoxic Lymphocytes
`and Tomor Cells
`Overexpressing the /TER2 Protooncogene” J. Exp, Med. 175:217-
`225 (Jan, 1, 1992).
`Sharkey et al, “Evaluation of a Complementarity-Determining
`Region-Grilied (Humanized) Anti-Carcinoembryonic Antigen
`Monoclonal Antibody in Preclinical Studies” Cancer Research
`§5(23 Suppl):5935s-594 5s (1995).
`Sums et al, “A Homanized CDLS Antibody Can Block Fonction
`Without Cell Destraction” J. /mnminel! 5 1(4):2296-2308 (Aug 15,
`1993),
`Stamenkovie et al.. “The B Lymphocyte Adhesion Molecule CD22
`Interacts with Leukocyte Common Antigen CD45RO on T Cells and
`02-6 Sialyltransferase, CD75, on B Cells” Cel! 66;1133-1144 (Sep.
`20, 1991).
`
`St. John et al.. “Immunologic Therapy for ARDS, Septic Shock. and
`Moltiple-Organ Failore” Chest 103:932-943 (1993),
`Stoppa et al., “Anti-L FAL Monoclonal Antibody (25,3) for Treat-
`ment of Steroid-Resistant Grade II[-TV Acote Grali-Versus-Host
`Disease” Transplant [International 4:3-7 (1991).
`‘Traunecker et al. “Bispecific Single Chain Molecules (Janusins)
`‘larget Cytotoxic Lymphocytes on HIV Intected Cells" Embo J,
`10(12):3655-3659 ( 1991),
`Tutt et al. “Trispecific F(ab’), Derivatives that Lise Cooperative
`Signaling Via the TCR/CD3 Complex and CD2 to Activate and
`Redirect Resting Cytotoxic T Cells”. Jmmunol. 147(1):60-69 (Jul,
`L991).
`Urlauba et al., “Isolation of Chinese Hamster Cell Mutants Deficient
`in Dihydrofolate Reductase Activity” Pree, Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
`THT)A216 (Jul. 1980).
`Vaughan et al., “Homan Antibodies With Sob-Nanomolar Affinilies
`Isolated From a Large Non-immunized Phage Display Library” Nar.
`Biotechnol, 14:309-314 (Mar. 1996).
`Velayadhan el al, “Modeling of Purification Operations in Biotech-
`nology: Enabling Process Development, Optimization, and Seale-
`Up" Biotechnol, Prog, 23:08-73 (2007, e-pub, Jan. 4, 2007).
`Verhoeyen et al, “Reshaping human antibodies: Grafling an
`Antilysozyme Activity” Sefence 239;1534-1536 (Mar, 1988).
`Waterhouse et al. “Combinatorial Infection and in vivo Recombi-
`nation: a Strategy for Making Large Phage Antibody Repertoires”
`Nuel. Acids Res, 21(9):2265-2266 (1993),
`Zapata et al., “Engineering linear F(ab’), Fragments for [flicient
`Production in Escherichia coli and Enhanced Antiproliferative
`Activity” Protein Ene, 8(10): 1057-1062 (1995).
`Duhamelet al, “pH gradient elution of human IgGl, [2G2 and IpG4
`from protein A-sepharose.” Journal of Immunological Metltods
`SL21L-217, (1979),
`Martin ef al., “Separation of guinea pig IgG subclasses by aflinity
`chromatography on protein A-sepharose,” Journal ofImmunolagi-
`cal Methods 52:205-212. (1982),
`Pan et al. “Quantitation of soluble aggregales in recombinant
`monoclonal antibody cell culture by pH-gradient protein A chro-
`matography,” Avmalytical Biochemistry 388:273-278, (2009, e-pub,
`Mar. 4, 2009),
`Supplementary European Search Report mailed on Mar, 28, 2014,
`for European Patent Application No, 10814394,2, filed on Sep. 1,
`2010, 19 pages.
`
`* cited by examiner
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 5 of 681 PageID #: 874
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 5 of 681 PagelD #: 874
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug, 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 1 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SUONBUOIU]uny|eereveerereSecanaaneiaaieaeaeeeentnimmsemmanmaesatnemmemmmemeninitammmememeenmmtenmmammmeaamemmmmmetmeeameeemmmmmmmaneaeemmmmamemmmmmmemmmmmmmet7scenamammeameercammmammmeaeneasteaamemememae=aemeetemente
`
`5,uonnia4!
`
`L#ApOoqnuyJOSA-aue1/6iz
`
`juaipes6Yd
`
` mAWARONPUODeo.S|93imfiEoOia|
`
`
`
` 1Ga4iffQiD
`
`_uoneseueBey
`
`
`
`Busuuibeqoy!)-do1s
`
`
`
`3SeuseM\seenncarneiiapidy-peo}
`
`AOOH
`
`“@OURCHOSaYy
`
`
`
`
`
`SeyMOj4UONN]A4U/ADOL
`
`UOHNISADOZ
`
`
`
`WSIPEsE)G%09-SE
`
`ESAaAREGGAESAABREGSSEOESATARGSS
`
`
`eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesseaneananamannnns
`
`|einbi-
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 6 of 681 PageID #: 875
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 6 of 681 PagelD #: 875
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug. 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 2 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`iITtSETae
`
`Zainbis
`
`civwewewewrere"18g
`
`
`
`
`Viteeetoeereddeenaede
`WAUUOHIBU
`
`
`
`
`anrngiatintenerdrniitnineteentiietenceariel
`nieBuiseaiouj
`
` Seen
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 7 of 681 PageID #: 876
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 7 of 681 PagelD #: 876
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug. 30,2016
`
`Sheet 3 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`+
`
`&
`
`Sa S
`
`ue
`
`S|
`
`&
`
`+
`
`ei
`
`w
`
`ag
`
`ca
`
`w
`
`ex;
`
`x N
`
`e
`
`XN
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`‘
`
`s
`
`©
`
`:
`
`«
`2
`a
`*
`LL
`©
`uh
`a
`,
`z=
`«
`©
`,
`*
`=
`
`:
`
`“st
`
`5
`&
`©
`>
`Le
`
`5
`e
`2
`;
`w
`
`"
`n=
`=>
`2
`a
`=
`
`2
`
`5
`=<
`06
`©
`i
`
`“2
`NX
`“S
`
`N
`
`N
`
`c9
`
`)
`ie
`
`©=| o
`
`s
`
`3s
`
`|
`8
`
`¢
`
`&
`
`+; ©
`e
`
`uonesbajul 94S %
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 8 of 681 PageID #: 877
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 8 of 681 PagelD #: 877
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug, 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 4 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`-
`¢
`S
`uoyesBaju| 94S %
`
`
`
`
`Apoqyue7qo-hue-
`,+0
`
`
`
`Ryt=.—»Msm/*<Apoqyue
`
`gt& x
`
`
`
`02oFohvkZlOL@9vé0
`“++t;|o~
`0¢8glvlzegg¥é0a.‘SRT.&Ca
`
`
`o
`
`
`
`
`
`(AD)uooes4uoqN|3
`
`
`
`
`
`(AQ)yoRoes4uoNN|Z
`
`oeJewouoy
` ghOnW-ue2#|ce+.—0gee4F%3TRhhaeetBeeThyTed
`00L
`
`
`
`
`
`(AD)uoraes4UoRN|S
`
`
`
`(AD)UoHDe14WORN
`
`3
`
`Jewouo|
`
` z
` g
`
`JeLUOUO\
`
`8
`
`=oa
`
`oamw
`
`=
`
`3
`uonesGeju] D4S %
`
`OzotSLviakOL89¥é0
`in:4»-2=r—==aae
`RR¥“,neAs7‘
`
`
`:Apoqnue9zq9-hue
`
`
`Ghwygmhhthpm#@
`
` co8&wm@&Ob89FF&OO‘ea=2*=zoer=+ay——0\4gwo3et,;aesea_=AITraOF—,Lta@gkpoqiue43A-Hue"2++3=—og2o2oJewOUoWeS
`
`
`
`PaDBNfeBOe00
`
`
`
`Vpaunbi4
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 9 of 681 PageID #: 878
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 9 of 681 PagelD #: 878
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug, 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 5 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`Figure 4B
`
`100 - SorannerenndtinemenntTnnnnenitinennmnstioneanadannnsanata
`Monomer
`
`
`
`%SECIntegration
`
`
`
`4
`
`12
`10
`8
`6
`Elution Fraction (CV)
`
`14
`
`|
`
`‘6
`
`18
`
`20
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 10 of 681 PageID #: 879
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 10 of 681 PagelD #: 879
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug, 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 6 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`%
`
`’©y*
`
`o
`
`+
`
`y@
`
`*
`
`
`
`(SA9)auunion|(ude)dOHS-
`
`
`ee%L'r6|%FLOL|—lonuoddaysozao-nuY
`juaipes6Hd,aee%'b6|—yuelperdHdOzaO-Huy
`3Se
`O¢6b@tZLOLSLPLEL@LLLOL6@289GSFPE€@tb
`joodyoowpayejnojeowossenjen
`
`
`
`
`
`wojnyayeGai66ypueApognuy02gO-que
`
`a+yiby—+sauougyy=
`obby——5bhy—«
` 000061:“St*AgeTce
`
`0000S°aneim|Hy000001{1re
`eeaLp
`000008—~g
`
`(uidd)OHO—fo(qwyGw)ayozaoeazzi
`
`
`
`uogni>dOHOpueApoqquy0Z7qo-que
`
`uonoes}
`qaubielg—=
`EMIONON
`
`00!
`
`8
`
`
`e¢: 228
`uojesbayu] 94S %
`(wdd) dOHO
`
`Si
`
`sgainbi4
`
`HATTETTTTEAL
`6elgsrezt
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 11 of 681 PageID #: 880
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 11 of 681 PagelD #: 880
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug, 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 7 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`|a(wdd)dOHO=|vka||REee
`L#ApoqnuyJO3A-HUeieee:|
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`uoHN|SdOHDpueL#Apoqguy3935A-gue
`
`9ainbi4
`
`
`
`
`
`(wdd) dOHO
`
`
`
`
`:et14+=b=4heFal+14a0acai‘tyPeau
`oz61ASLbh&b2bBhReeABORSE
`
` ;(v031:;|90»>&=Ts0=Fr=:|Sy|'(+a3
`
`
`
`
`
`uoHnN|adOHDpueL#Apognuy4DSA-Hue
`
`ug|e4
`
`Oé€6L
`
`db
`
`Beets
`
`
`
`L#ApOgnUYSOSA-NUEmame
`
`
`
`(qwi/6u)doHO*
`
`a
`
`
`
`aS osNe2etar eoo oOo <a 0
`L#Apoqnuy
`ADaA-Hue Ww/Gw
`
`o ©
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 12 of 681 PageID #: 881
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 12 of 681 PagelD #: 881
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug, 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 8 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`00001-200S!-900002-=000s->ooo©ooose-
`
`00005~
`
`o00sP
`
`0000+
`
`000S
`
`&
`
`ee
`
`Ee
`
`eh
`
`ES
`
`0Z
`
`6L
`
`gL
`
`él
`
`Oc6L
`
`BL
`
`db
`
`
`
`OLSbwb
`
`eb
`
`LLOb6
`
`uopzei4
`
`(wdd)OHO*=ApoqnuySLOnW-huesam
`
`Pee
`OLStvlEbGbLEOb6
`
`uonn|3dOHDPueApognuy9,9NW-jue
`
`
`uonN|adOHDPueApoqnuy9LOnI-jue
`(quw/6u)dOHD@Apoqnuy9LONHUemee
`
`
`
`sueeEE
`EgAli
`
`
`
`==
`
`bd
`
`uogoel4
`
`B(Be"SS
`
`v
`
`bé
`
`a0
`
`Zainbi4
`
`~ © W
`
`mH N = O&O
`T+
`Apoqnuy
`SLONW-Hue w/b
`
`{
`i
`~ oo
`
`|
`t
`ow
`uD —
`A
`poqquy
`SLONW-HuUe qWw/Bu
`
`a =
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 13 of 681 PageID #: 882
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 13 of 681 PagelD #: 882
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug, 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 9 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`
`
`L#ApogiuyADSA-hue7/6pL(BAedesoid
`
`aiL#Apoguuy4J53A-Hue7/61g‘sieuo|v
`
`WiPS|BSQe\
`
`SMBsgdegoigiBAgdasoid
`
`
`
`V¥wieimdeogeysSOuOd
`
`
`
`vwBUNSpejesqeyy
`
`
`
`
`
`AINOG8SEUdYONNIS
`
`8%09-Se
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 14 of 681 PageID #: 883
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 14 of 681 PagelD #: 883
`
`Aug, 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 10 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`Boy
`
`SIEWHSF
`
`6OZE0E8'0-
`
`8096209"0-
`
`SrOlzrz'0
`
`We} sesneoauljo%0¢Aqpaureidxe
`
`
`eqUBDJOIARYEGPSAJESgoBu]JO%08,,
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`
`
` PO|GIOUNOJBIEYOYL6einbi-
`
`
`
`URIS(2¢'12)(7/8)Aisueqpeo7(Sr'Gz)a%
`
`
`
`(UI)OUsquepisey
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 15 of 681 PageID #: 884
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 15 of 681 PagelD #: 884
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug. 30,2016
`
`Sheet 11 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`Figure 10
`
`%Monomer al85%Yiels
`%Monomer at85%Yield
`%Monomer at85%Yield
`%Monomer ai85%Yield
`
`Start %B
`
`Load Density
`{alt}
`
`Total Elution
`Length (CVs)
`
`SoueDISeH
`
`Aysuagpeo}g%UeIs
`
`
`
`(SAD)uybus]USI]
`|eiO|
`(tiLu)Oey
`
`/
`
`\
`*
`
`‘
`
`ee
`
`OeHS
`
`i
`
`;
`
`Residence
`
`Time (min)
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 16 of 681 PageID #: 885
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 16 of 681 PagelD #: 885
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug, 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 12 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
` L
`
`
`
`SUINIOAjOCdADOD
`
`
`
`4GWUOUOW%90°66
`
`PISA%06
`
`40
`
`BUNIGAJOGdgADP'S
`
`JBWOUOW%L0'66
`
` 12HMOj4VON4U/ADSUOHNIAAD6i#Apognuy4DaA-Hue1/61z
`
`PIPEA%S8
`
`WsIPeIH09-0
`
`
`
`TUOHPULIOJUY][OO
`
`SUOHEULOJU]UNY
`
`~ eBeIOIS
`
`uoniouabay
`
`uousii4i‘
`
`Lingo
`
`f}
`
`seuseM
`
`i
`
`es
`
`
`
`peo}JOOH
`
`uOequiNbS
`
`esouBqiosgy
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 17 of 681 PageID #: 886
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 17 of 681 PagelD #: 886
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug, 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 13 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`Figure 12
`
`Protein A pH STEP-
`GRADIENTElution
`
`CHOP: 1200 ppm
`Monomer: 99.3%
`
`
`Yield: 92%
`, Mustang? $ Coin
`© PHS.5,3mS/em :
`|
`
`0.35 mL, 16 layer |ea=
`
`+.
`
`"Sartorius QNano|
`pH 9.0,2.5 mS/em -
`
`1.0mL, 15layer
`;
`
`
`sinning
`
`x3
`
`[PARMAAAAH
`
`
`er tiie
`Mustang® S Coin
`| Mustang® S Acrodisc®
`pH 5.5,3 mS/cm
`it pH 5.5, 3 mS/cm 0.18
`| 088ml. 16ayer
`
`
`--Mustang®Q)Acrodisc®
`”Mustang®QCoin
`eS 9.0, 2.5 mS/cm
`-
`pH 9.0, 2.5 mS/cm
`
`O18iBlayer,
`
`
`
`
`CHOP: < 3.8 ppm
`Monomer: 98.8%
`Yield: ~100%
`Gent (ppm): 0.9
`BNA: LTR
`
`CHOP: 14 ppm
`Monomer: 99.1%
`Yield: ~100%
`Gent (ppm): < 0.9
`DNA: LTR
`
`CHOP: 8 pom
`Monomer: 98.3%
`Yield: ~100%
`Gent (ppm}: < 0.9
`ONA: LTR
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 18 of 681 PageID #: 887
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 18 of 681 PagelD #: 887
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug, 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 14 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`
`
`¢%JOWOUOWLgp%2Z'66
`028L9LvlélOL89vC0=sons+¥—*Wewse@oewe$0xe
`
` SMWAH-*uol}OeI4028L9}vbclOL8]vC0—>==?—eee“G-~1pepe——tI)xSe|”+ssY0gm¢=JOWOUOW%€£°66+OF=“’PIF!%980&aea‘PL-L
`SUOI}ORIYPajood©|08a%i2i:ty¢»ieOOL~
`
`
`.~@|=
`SuoNoey—_PIF1A%88|3|¥ MpL-,pajoog©|og
`
`
`
`
`juawBeljJauougy©Jal]#SNMAH+UOI}OP14-
`
`
`juawbelj——jauougjy*«Jags@)S
`
`;08a4~,3@ȴ#~yrm#6se|00l+
`
`
`
`
`SINSBYDASUWNIODThyUE1OKyL#APOgqUYJOSANU
`
`
`
`
`
`€,aunbl4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SYNSEYDASUNIONqwugzeJB9gjjeus|#APOqHuUYJO5A-UY
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 19 of 681 PageID #: 888
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 19 of 681 PagelD #: 888
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`La3ii.iat-Oo
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug. 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 15 of 21
`
`7
`
`°S_L
`
`T”L
`
`L
`LL
`
`Gs
`2h
`
`o:u
`
`iO
`
`ak
`LL
`DB
`
`O ©P
`oU
`
`p
`Oo
`2
`
`oagw
`
`”
`
`OdA/OHS/44S0/d9}S
`
`~___
`
`oO
`Oo
`xa
`o
`°
`So
`Aesegq Aiiqeewsed Od gIAIOSAYIA
`
`ZUdA/XAO/JASOAua!pesb-days|
`
`,7=
`
`pLeinbi
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`oossooosoOoSsPOooOorOOSEo000c00sto000zOOSTOOO!oosoO
`
`
`
`Zuwyqyw6yndyBnoi4s01g@SATIOSSYIA
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 20 of 681 PageID #: 889
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 20 of 681 PagelD #: 889
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug, 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 16 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`"uOHeUUOsUuN SteunBi
`
`
`
`ifApogiuy4O3A-ue1/612
`
`
`
`JUBIPBIE)°09-SzeFigs
`
`UOHnIyAD0Z
`
`
`
`
`
`aieyMOj4UCHNIS4W/ADOFapie
`
`SuSEAAbgees2oD
`
`
`
`uoeieuabay
`
`MOERTS
`
`voriqHnby
`
`
`
`& SSes
`
`>eosoowQi'oCBt
`
`senate1A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 21 of 681 PageID #: 890
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 21 of 681 PagelD #: 890
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug.30, 2016
`
`Sheet 17 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`abwos
`2)
`eidteenennencnannntantheAnse
`poveetterreeo
`i
`ecieaHiAZTRG?aac si
`
`a
`
`fs
`
`‘
`>
`ves
`
`uonweusiey
`
` Se Aen anes taetal ous uns Gurwen,
`
`i
`
`iB ce
`
`i 3ii
`:
`4
`i
`
`o
`
`w
`‘i
`
`“ee,
`
`cuniut (aesahaaetnaADASOW CMaaniNn on i
`
` Washes 14g/Lanti-VEGFAntibody#1
`
`
`
`0-100%8Gradient
`
`20CVElution
`
`fiHCCFLoad
`
`a.
`
`
`
`&#
`|
`uonesqyinby
`
`op
`ce
`cy
`ae
`¢-
`te
`of
`>
`oer
`>
`oh
`eb
`oe
`oF
`aa
`o
`rd
`oe
`2
`a
`=
`=
`25
`ee
`4 2
`Es
`ee
`ts
`=
`ot
`=
`Hy
`os
`sa
`ae
`
`Ssoueqiosay
`
`
`
`RunInformation:
`
`Figure16
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 22 of 681 PageID #: 891
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 22 of 681 PagelD #: 891
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug, 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 18 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`ec
`
`« @ .
`
`oa
`s
`Bl
`»
`
`%
`§
`
`-_
`\
`~
`&
`a
`/
`c
`Eis
`‘n
`i
`=
`a
`|
`\
`a
`om
`!
`
`68
`|
`<
`+A
`$
`|
`m4
`i}
`
`&
`
`&
`
`B
`
`a
`
`8
`
`,
`
`8
`
`B
`
`Ss
`
`8
`
`8
`
`pt
`
`|
`
`=
`
`5
`"
`©
`.
`
`w
`
`4
`
`a
`
`a
`
`g;
`
`Ww
`
`2
`<c
`oO
`5
`<=
`roi
`Are
`
`é
`2
`=
`.
`wt
`E
`
`N
`
`i ®t
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`e
`
`8
`
`8
`
`@
`
`8
`
`& &
`
`suojesbeju] Yad DAI%
`
`o |
`
`
`
`1 a =|— ——e =.= =
`
`€
`€
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 23 of 681 PageID #: 892
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 23 of 681 PagelD #: 892
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug. 30,2016
`
`Sheet 19 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`(quysajayed) d1Au
`8
`8B
`&®’
`&
`®&§
`&§
`&
`&
`_
`_
`o
`wo
`
`©
`8
`z
`
`«6
`8&8
`™
`
`ao
`
`&®
`eo
`—
`
`6
`o
`=
`
`&8’§
`+
`
`a
`
`Se gS
`=U
`eg 2
`
`
`
`= n
`
`m 2
`
`2
`‘
`=
`=
`=6
`" 3
`Se
`~
`=
`=]
`
`a
`
`a
`
`2
`z
`im
`=
`S
`3
`=
`S
`
`Lc
`
`1
`=
`
`& 3
`
`Fi
`=
`fe
`ua
`=
`¥
`3
`2
`2
`
`o
`>
`
`,
`
`Figure18
`
`|
`
`
`
`(qui/Gw) Apoqyue 4535,A-Huy
`
`
`o
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 24 of 681 PageID #: 893
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 24 of 681 PagelD #: 893
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug. 30,2016
`
`Sheet 20 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`Anti-VEGFantibody#1andRVLPElution:LRVperfraction
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fractions
`
`
`
`Figure19
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 25 of 681 PageID #: 894
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 25 of 681 PagelD #: 894
`
`U.S. Patent
`
`Aug, 30, 2016
`
`Sheet 21 of 21
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`20
`
`16
`
`14
`
`10
`
`
`
`PooledFractions(2-X)
`
`
`
`MockPoolLRVs
`
`Figure20
`
`u3
`
`—_
`
`9
`
`™
`
`Ad 199d
`
`
`
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 26 of 681 PageID #: 895
`Case 1:18-cv-00095-CFC Document 1-3 Filed 01/12/18 Page 26 of 681 PagelD #: 895
`
`US 9,428,548 B2
`
`1
`ENHANCED PROTEIN PURIFICATION
`THROUGH A MODIFIED PROTEIN A
`ELUTION
`
`CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED
`APPLICATIONS
`
`‘This patent application is submitted under 35 U.S.C. §371
`as a U.S. national stage application of International Patent
`Application No. PC'T/US2010/047448,filed on Sep. 1, 2010
`which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application
`No. 61/238,867,
`filed Sep. 1, 2009 and ULS. Provisional
`Patent Application No, 61/253,438 filed Oct. 20, 2009, the
`disclosure of each of which are incorporated herein by
`reference in their entirety.
`
`FIELD OF THE INVENTION
`
`‘The field ofthis invention relates generally to methods for
`purifying a polypeptide comprising a C,,2/C,,3 region, com-
`prising binding the polypeptide to Protein A andeluting with
`a pHgradient.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`The large-scale, economic purification of proteins is
`increasingly an important problem for the biotechnology
`industry. Generally, proteins are produced by cell culture,
`using either mammalian or bacterial cell lines engineered to
`produce the proteinofinterest by insertion ofa recombinant
`plasmid containing the gene for that protein. Since the cell
`lines used are living organisms. they must be fed with a
`complex growth medium, containing sugars, amino acids,
`and growth lactors, usually supplied from preparations of
`animal serum, Separation of the desired protein from the
`nuxture of compounds fed to the cells and from the by-
`products of the cells themselves to a purity suflicient for use
`as a human therapeutic poses a formidable challenge.
`Procedures for purification of proteins from cell debris
`initially depend on the site of expression of the protein.
`Someproteins can be caused to be secreted directly from the
`cell
`into the surrounding growth media: others are made
`intracellularly. For the latter proteins,
`the first step ofa
`purification process involves lysis of the cell, which can be
`done by a variety of methods, including mechanical shear,
`osmotic shock. or enzymatic treatments, Such disruption
`releases the entire contents ofthe cel] into the homogenate,
`and in addition produces subcellular fragments that are
`difficult to remove due to their small size. These are gener-
`ally removed by differential centrifugation or by filtration.
`The same problemarises, although on a smaller scale, with
`directly secreted proteins due to the natural death ofcells
`and release of intracellular host cell proteins in the course of
`the protein production run.
`Once a clarified solution containing the protein ofinterest
`has been obtained.
`its separation from the other proteins
`produced by the cell is usually attempted using a combina-
`tion of different chromatography techniques. Affinity chro-
`matography, which exploits a specific interaction between
`the protein to be purified and an immobilized capture agent,
`is commonly used for some proteins (e.g., proteins for use
`as a human therapeutic). Protein A is a useful adsorbent for
`aflinity chromatography of proteins, such as antibodies.
`which contain an Pe region. Protein A is a 41 kD cell wall
`protein from Staphylococcus areas which binds with a high
`allinity (about 10-" M to human IgG) to the Fe region of
`antibodies. However, since proteins tend to aggregate or
`
`{
`
`20
`
`ha Ay
`5
`
`zl}
`
`AO
`
`4s
`
`wn o
`5
`
`Lat ae
`
`61
`
`63
`
`2
`the desired protein (i.c.. monomer) is
`become misfolded,
`often co-purified with other impurities from these aflinity
`columns, such as protein aggregates, by-products ofthe cells
`themselves (i.e,. host cell impurities), or virus filter foulant,
`Other techniques have been developed to further separate
`these impurities and mixtures of proteins on the basis oftheir
`charge, degree of hydrophobicity. or size, such as ton
`exchange chromatography, hydrophobic interaction chroma-
`tography. or size exclusion chromatography. Several difler-
`ent chromatographyresins or sorbents are available for each
`ofthese techniques, allowing accurate tailoring of the puri-
`fication scheme {o
`the particular protein involved. The
`essence of each ofthese separation methods is that proteins
`can be caused either to move at different rates down a long
`solid phase (e.g,. column), achieving a physical separation
`thal increases as they pass further down the solid phase. or
`to adhere selectively to the separation medium, being then
`differentially eluted by different solvents. However. eachof
`these methods requires additional bullers. resins or sorbents,
`and other resources for further purification, and this in turn
`results in longer processing lime and higher cost. Thus, more
`efhcient and economical methods for purifying protein
`monomers are needed.
`Methods of purifying polypeptides from aggregates, mul-
`timers, and modified proteins using a protein A column and
`eluting with a pH gradient elution system was described in
`U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/008,160.
`All publications, patents, and patent applications cited
`herein are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their
`entirety for all pur