`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS
`and CARMEL LABORATORIES, LLC,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`L’ORÉAL USA, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 17-cv-868-CFC-SRF
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST NOTICE OF RULE 30(b)(6)
`DEPOSITION TO DEFENDANT L’OREAL USA, INC.
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure, on or before October 18, 2019 and at a mutually agreeable location, counsel for
`
`Plaintiffs University of Massachusetts and Carmel Laboratories, LLC will take the deposition(s)
`
`of the designated representative(s) of Defendant L’Oréal USA (“L’Oréal”), able to testify fully
`
`as to the topics listed in Schedules A and B. The deposition(s) will continue from day to day
`
`until completed. The deposition(s) will be taken before a duly qualified notary public or other
`
`officer authorized by law to administer oaths. The deposition will be recorded by video and
`
`stenographic means. The deposition may be used to preserve testimony for trial, to obtain
`
`discovery, and for any other purpose authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
`
`By September 23, 2019 L’Oréal shall provide a written designation of the name(s) and
`
`position(s) of the one or more officers, directors, or managing agents, or other person(s) who
`
`will be produced to testify on its behalf concerning the topics and matters set forth in Schedules
`
`A and B. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6), the person(s) designated by
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00868-CFC-SRF Document 55 Filed 09/20/19 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 1429
`
`L’Oréal should be prepared to testify to such matters known or reasonably available to L’Oréal
`
`as set forth in Schedules A and B.
`
`
`Dated: September 20, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`FARNAN LLP
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Brian E. Farnan
`Brian E. Farnan (Bar No. 4089)
`Michael J. Farnan (Bar No. 5165)
`919 North Market Street, 12th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Telephone: (302) 777-0300
`Facsimile: (302) 777-0301
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for University of Massachusetts
`and Carmel Laboratories, LLC
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Of Counsel:
`William Christopher Carmody
`Tamar E. Lusztig
`Beatrice C. Franklin
`SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
`New York, NY 10019
`Telephone: (212) 336-8330
`Facsimile: (212) 336-8340
`bcarmody@susmangodfrey.com
`tlusztig@susmangodfrey.com
`bfranklin@susmangodfrey.com
`
`Justin A. Nelson
`SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
`1000 Louisiana Street, Suite 5100
`Houston, Texas 77002
`Telephone: (713) 651-9366
`Facsimile: (713) 654-6666
`jnelson@susmangodfrey.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00868-CFC-SRF Document 55 Filed 09/20/19 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 1430
`
`Attorneys for Carmel Laboratories, LLC
`
`Attorney for University of Massachusetts
`
`Matthew B. Lowrie
`FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
`111 Huntington Avenue, Suite 2600
`Boston, MA 02199
`Telephone: (617) 342-4000
`Facsimile: (617) 342-4001
`mlowrie@foley.com
`
`
`
`
`COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS,
`
`By its attorney,
`
`MAURA HEALEY
`ATTORNEY GENERAL
`
`By: William Christopher Carmody
`William Christopher Carmody
`Special Assistant Attorney General
`SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
`1301 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
`New York, NY 10019
`Telephone: (212) 336-8330
`Facsimile: (212) 336-8340
`bcarmody@susmangodfrey.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00868-CFC-SRF Document 55 Filed 09/20/19 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 1431
`
`SCHEDULE A
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`The deposition topics are subject to and incorporate the following definitions:
`
`1. The term “UMass” refers to the University of Massachusetts, including any of its past and
`
`present affiliates, operating divisions, campuses, subsidiaries, directors, officers, agents,
`
`employees, representatives, and all persons acting on its behalf.
`
`2. The term “Carmel Labs” refers to Carmel Laboratories, LLC, including any of its past and
`
`present affiliates, operating divisions, parent corporations, subsidiaries, directors, officers,
`
`agents, employees, representatives, and all persons acting on its behalf.
`
`3. The terms “Defendant,” “You,” “Your,” or “L’Oréal” shall refer to defendant L’Oréal
`
`USA, Inc., and shall include L’Oréal S.A. as well as L’Oréal USA Inc.’s parent,
`
`subsidiaries, affiliates, divisions, successors or assignees, and their respective officers,
`
`directors, employees, consultants, representatives, and agents.
`
`4. The term “Present Lawsuit” refers to the case styled University of Massachusetts, et al. v.
`
`L’Oréal USA, Inc., Case No. 1:17-cv-00868-CFC-SRF, pending in the United States
`
`District Court for the District of Delaware.
`
`5. The term “Document” or “Documents” is used in the broadest sense permitted by the
`
`Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and means the original (or any copy when originals are
`
`not available) and any drafts or non-identical copies thereof, whether different from the
`
`original because of interlineations, receipt stamp, notation of copy sent or received or
`
`otherwise, of any email, instant message, voicemail, book, pamphlet, periodical, letter,
`
`report, note, memorandum, record, minutes, calendar or diary entry, transcript, study,
`
`compilation, analysis, tabulation, map, diagram, drawing, plan, picture, summary, working
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00868-CFC-SRF Document 55 Filed 09/20/19 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 1432
`
`paper, chart, paper, graph index, data sheet, data processing card, computer printout,
`
`summary of a computer printout, tape, contract, agreement, lease, ledger, journal, balance
`
`sheet, account, invoice, purchase order, receipt, billing record, financial data, financial
`
`statement, file, diary, film, trip tickets, telex, teletype or other messages, telegram, expense
`
`vouchers, instructions, bulletins or any other writing or recording of information, as well
`
`as all tape recordings, computer tapes, discs and other electronic or mechanical recordings,
`
`however produced, maintained or reproduced, including information stored in or generated
`
`by a computer whether or not ever printed out or displayed, within the possession, custody
`
`or control of plaintiff or any of its officers, directors, employees, attorneys, or other agents
`
`and/or representatives.
`
`6. The term “Person” means natural person, corporation, firm, company, sole proprietorship,
`
`partnership, joint venture, association, institute, or other business, legal or governmental
`
`entity or association, including any directors, officers, employees, agents or representatives
`
`thereof.
`
`7. The term “Agreement” means a contract, agreement, arrangement, or understanding,
`
`formal or informal, oral or written, between two or more persons.
`
`8. The term “Communication” refers to any transfer of information, oral or written, be it in
`
`the form of facts, ideas, inquiries, opinions or otherwise, by any means, at any time or
`
`place, under any circumstances, and is not limited to transfers between persons, but
`
`includes other transfers, such as records and memoranda to the file.
`
`9. The phrase “Relating To” means discussing, describing, referring to, pertaining to,
`
`containing, analyzing, studying, reporting on, commenting on, evidencing, constituting,
`
`setting forth, considering, recommending, concerning, or pertaining to, in whole or in part.
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00868-CFC-SRF Document 55 Filed 09/20/19 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 1433
`
`10. The terms “Asserted Patents” and “Patents-in-Suit” shall mean United States Patents No.
`
`6,423,327 and 6,645,513.
`
`11. The term “’327 Patent” refers to U.S. Patent No. 6,423,327.
`
`12. The term “’513 Patent” refers to U.S. Patent No. 6,645,513.
`
`13. The term “Prior Art” means any evidence qualifying as prior art to the Patents-in-Suit under
`
`35 U.S.C. § 102 and/or 35 U.S.C. § 103.
`
`14. The terms “all” and “each” shall be construed as “and,” “each,” and “and/or.”
`
`15. The term “any” should be understood in either its most or least inclusive sense as will bring
`
`within the scope of the topic all responses that might otherwise be construed to be out of
`
`its scope.
`
`16. The term “including” shall mean including but not limited to.
`
`17. The terms “relate,” “relating,” or “related” mean in any way, directly or indirectly, in whole
`
`or part, relating to, concerning, referring to, discussing, mentioning, regarding, pertaining
`
`to, describing, reflecting, containing, analyzing, studying, reporting on, commenting on,
`
`evidencing, constituting, setting forth, considering, recommending, modifying, amending,
`
`confirming, endorsing, representing, supporting, qualifying, terminating, revoking,
`
`refuting, undermining, canceling, contradicting or negating.
`
`18. The terms “and” and “or” shall be construed disjunctively or conjunctively as necessary
`
`to bring within the scope of these topics all information which might otherwise be
`
`construed to be outside their scope.
`
`19. All requests apply equally to sales made in the United States as well as sales made in any
`
`other country.
`
`20. References to the singular shall include the plural, and references to the plural shall
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00868-CFC-SRF Document 55 Filed 09/20/19 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 1434
`
`include the singular as may be appropriate to construe the individual document requests in
`
`their broadest form.
`
`21. The masculine form of a noun or pronoun shall be considered to include within its meaning
`
`the feminine form of the noun or pronoun, and vice versa as may be appropriate to make
`
`the individual document requests inclusive rather than exclusive.
`
`22. “State in detail” means to give a complete and full description concerning the matter about
`
`which inquiry is made, including the full name, address and telephone number of persons
`
`involved, if appropriate, along with the dates, times, places, amounts, acts, logic, and other
`
`particulars that make the answers to the interrogatory fair and meaningful.
`
`23. “Identify,” when used with reference to:
`
`a. an individual person, means to state his or her full name, present or last known
`
`employer, job title, general job description, present or last known residence
`
`addresses and telephone number, and present or last known business addresses and
`
`telephone number;
`
`b. a business entity, means to state the full name and address of the entity and the
`
`names and positions of the individual or individuals connected with such entity who
`
`have knowledge of the information requested.
`
`c. a document, means to identify the document by bates number, or if it is not bates
`
`numbered, to state the type of document (letter, memorandum, email, etc.), its dates,
`
`author(s) or originator(s), addresse(s), all individuals who received copies of the
`
`document, the identity of persons known or presumed by you to have present
`
`possession, custody or control thereof, and a brief description of the subject matter
`
`and present location.
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00868-CFC-SRF Document 55 Filed 09/20/19 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 1435
`
`d. An offering, system or method means to specify a part number, trade name, catalog
`
`number, version number, and any other designation used to refer to the product,
`
`system or method.
`
`24.
`
`So as to construe the individual Deposition Topics in the broadest form, references
`
`to the singular shall include the plural and references to the plural shall include the singular.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-00868-CFC-SRF Document 55 Filed 09/20/19 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 1436
`
`SCHEDULE B
`
`DEPOSITION TOPICS
`
`
`DEPOSITION TOPIC NO. 1):
`
`Whether and how documents and/or things created and/or maintained by L’Oréal S.A.—
`
`including but not limited to documents and things related to product research, revenue and profit
`information, product tests and their results, patent filings, product samples, and L’Oréal S.A.’s
`communications with potential patent licensors—can be requested, accessed, or obtained by
`L’Oréal USA, including but not limited to computer server access, shared document access, hard
`copies, and/or communications about any of the same.
`
`DEPOSITION TOPIC NO. 2):
`
`
`Whether and how documents and/or things created and/or maintained by L’Oréal USA.—
`including but not limited to documents and things related to product research, revenue and profit
`information, product tests and their results, patent filings, product samples, and L’Oréal S.A.’s
`communications with potential patent licensors—can be requested, accessed, or obtained by
`L’Oréal S.A., including but not limited to computer server access, shared document access, hard
`copies, and/or communications about any of the same.
`
`DEPOSITION TOPIC NO. 3):
`
`Whether and how L’Oréal S.A. and L’Oréal USA communicate on corporate matters, including
`but not limited to sales of products, testing of products, marketing of products, revenue and profits
`from those products, and/or allegations of patent infringement.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`