throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00868-CFC-SRF Document 118 Filed 04/17/20 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 3680
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 17-cv-868-CFC-SRF
`
`UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS
`and CARMEL LABORATORIES, LLC,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`L’ORÉAL USA, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`MOTION TO RESOLVE DISCOVERY DISPUTE
`The parties respectfully move this Court to address outstanding disputes regarding
`
`
`
`
`
`the following discovery matters during the April 24, 2020 teleconference:
`
`Issues Raised During the March 26, 2020 Teleconference1
`
` Plaintiffs’ request for the production of further marketing, sales, and business
`documents from Defendant in response to Plaintiffs’ Requests for Production No. 31,
`40, 41, 42, 44, 45, 51, 62, 66, and 67;
` Plaintiffs’ request for the production of further testing materials from Defendant in
`response to Requests for Production No. 25, 28, 32, 33, 34, 50, 59, and 60;
` Plaintiffs’ request for the production of internal and external communications
`regarding the FTC investigation into the Accused Products (DOCKET NO. C-4489)
`in response to Plaintiffs’ Request for Production No. 62;
` The parties’ stipulation regarding the Teresian Carmelites;2 and
` The case schedule.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The Parties have resolved the dispute regarding Plaintiffs’ Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of Defendant
`on noticed topics regarding Defendant’s document collection and production. The deposition is
`scheduled to go forward using TSG remote reporting on April 23, 2020.
`
` The Parties have met and conferred about this draft stipulation and expect to resolve this dispute
`in advance of the scheduled April 24, 2020 teleconference.
`
` 2
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00868-CFC-SRF Document 118 Filed 04/17/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 3681
`
`Issues Not Raised During the March 26, 2020 Teleconference
`
` Plaintiffs’ request for the production of further Accused Product development records
`from Defendant in response to Plaintiffs’ Requests for Production No. 27, 32, 42, and
`53;
` Plaintiffs’ request for the production of further patent records from Defendant in
`response to Plaintiffs’ Requests for Production No. 22 and 23;
` Defendant’s request for relief with respect to documents underlying Plaintiffs’ testing
`that formed the basis for their Infringement Contentions; and
` Plaintiffs’ request for organizational charts from Defendant in response to Plaintiffs’
`Request for Production No. 35 and to assist Plaintiffs in identifying appropriate
`witnesses for 30(b)(6) depositions.3
`
`The following attorneys, including at least one Delaware Counsel and at least one Lead
`
`
`
`Counsel per party, participated in a verbal meet-and-confer by telephone on the following date:
`
`April 14, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`Delaware Counsel for Plaintiffs:
`
`
`Brian Farnan
`Farnan LLP
`
`Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs:
`
`
`
`
`Delaware Counsel for Defendant:
`
`
`Justin Nelson
`Tamar Lusztig
`Beatrice Franklin
`Susman Godfrey LLP
`
`Kate Mowery
`Richards Layton & Finger PA
`
`Lead Counsel for Defendant:
`
`
`
`
`Isaac Ashkenazi
`Katherine F. Murray
`Serli Polatoglu
`Paul Hastings LLP
`
`
`Briefing
`
`Plaintiffs’ Proposal: The Parties request to submit simultaneous briefing limited to 3
`
`pages per side on all the above-listed issues raised on the March 26, 2020 teleconference by
`
`
`3 Defendant contends the parties have not met and conferred on this issue.
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00868-CFC-SRF Document 118 Filed 04/17/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 3682
`
`April 21, and briefing in accordance with Magistrate Judge Fallon’s Standing Order on
`
`Discovery Matters for the above-listed issues not raised on the March 26, 2020 teleconference
`
`consisting of either (1) three additional pages to be included in the simultaneous submissions
`
`above or (2) briefing pursuant to the Court’s Order on Discovery Matters with opening letters
`
`submitted April 20 and answering letters submitted April 22.
`
`Defendant’s Proposal: The Parties request leave to submit briefing on all issues listed
`
`above in accordance with Magistrate Judge Fallon’s Standing Order on Discovery Matters.
`
`The Parties will continue to meet and confer in good faith and attempt to resolve these
`
`disputes in advance of the April 24, 2020 teleconference.
`
`Dated: April 17, 2020
`
`FARNAN LLP
`
`
`
`/s/ Brian E. Farnan
`Brian E. Farnan (Bar No. 4089)
`Michael J. Farnan (Bar No. 5165)
`919 N. Market St., 12th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 777-0300
`(302) 777-0301 (Fax)
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.
`
`
`/s/ Katharine L. Mowery
`Frederick L. Cottrell, III (#2555)
`Jeffrey L. Moyer (#3309)
`Katharine L. Mowery (#5629)
`One Rodney Square
`920 N. King Street
`Wilmington, Delaware 19801
`(302) 651-7700
`cottrell@rlf.com
`moyer@rlf.com
`mowery@rlf.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant L’Oréal USA, Inc.
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket