`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`WIRTGEN AMERICA, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`CATERPILLAR, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 1:17-cv-00770-JDW
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`
`AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant
`
`Caterpillar, Inc.’s Motion Regarding Estoppel Defenses (D.I. 364), it is ORDERED as follows:
`
`1.
`
`The Motion is DENIED to the extent that Caterpillar asserts equitable defenses
`
`pertaining to the U.S. Patent No. 7,828,309, U.S. Patent No. 9,656,530, and U.S. Patent No.
`
`7,946,788; and
`
`2.
`
`The Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the extent that Caterpillar
`
`asks me to find that U.S. Patent No. RE48,268 Patent is unenforceable.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY THE COURT:
`
`/s/ Joshua D. Wolson
`JOSHUA D. WOLSON, J.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`