throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00297-LPS-CJB Document 15 Filed 05/09/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 94
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Case No. 1:17-cv-00297-LPS-CJB
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`
`
`DENSO CORPORATION, AND DENSO
`INTERNATIONAL AMERICA, INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT DENSO CORPORATION, AND DENSO INTERNATIONAL AMERICA,
`INC.’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO STAY ACTION PENDING ITC DETERMINATION
`
`Defendants DENSO CORPORATION (“DCJP”) and DENSO INTERNATIONAL
`
`AMERICA, INC. (“DIAM”) (collectively “DENSO” or “Defendants”) respectfully move this
`
`Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659 and its inherent powers to control its docket for a stay of all
`
`proceedings in the above-captioned case until the determination of the United States
`
`International Trade Commission (“ITC”) in a parallel proceeding becomes final. Pursuant to
`
`District of Delaware Local Rule 7.1.1, the parties have met and conferred regarding this motion.
`
`Plaintiff Intellectual Ventures II LLC (“IV”) does not oppose this motion.
`
`On March 20, 2017, IV filed its complaint against DENSO in this action (“the Delaware
`
`action”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,067,952 (“the ’952 patent”). The very next
`
`day, IV also filed a complaint against DENSO with the ITC (“the ITC action”) asserting the ’952
`
`patent. The ITC instituted the ITC action on April 28, 2017.
`
`Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1659 district court patent claims that involve the same issues as a
`
`parallel ITC proceeding are subject to a mandatory stay. Specifically, 28 U.S.C. § 1659(a)
`
`provides:
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00297-LPS-CJB Document 15 Filed 05/09/17 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 95
`
`(a) Stay. In a civil action involving parties that are also parties to a
`proceeding before
`the United States
`International Trade
`Commission under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, at the
`request of a party to the civil action that is also a respondent in the
`proceeding before the Commission, the district court shall stay,
`until
`the determination of
`the Commission becomes final,
`proceedings in the civil action with respect to any claim that
`involves the same issues involved in the proceeding before the
`Commission, but only if such request is made within –
`
`(1) 30 days after the party is named as a respondent in the
`proceeding before the Commission, or
`
`(2) 30 days after the district court action is filed, whichever is
`later.
`
`28 U.S.C. § 1659(a). A stay issued under this statute remains in effect during any appeals and
`
`“until the Commission proceedings are no longer subject to judicial review.” In re Princo Corp.,
`
`478 F.3d 1345, 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2007). Here, because the patent asserted in this action is also
`
`asserted against DENSO in the 337-TA-1052 Investigation, and because the parties and the
`
`accused products are also the same, a stay of this case is mandatory upon timely request by
`
`DENSO. DENSO’s request is timely under §1659 because this request is being made within 30
`
`days of the May 3, 2017 publication of the ITC’s Notice of Institution of Investigation, which
`
`names DENSO as respondents in the 337-TA-1052 Investigation.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, DENSO respectfully requests that the Court enter the attached
`
`proposed order and stay all proceedings in the Delaware action until the determination of the
`
`337-TA-1052 Investigation becomes final, including any appeals and until the Commission
`
`proceedings are no longer subject to judicial review.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00297-LPS-CJB Document 15 Filed 05/09/17 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 96
`
`Dated: May 9, 2017
`
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`Paul R. Steadman
`Matthew Satchwell
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`203 N. LaSalle St., Suite 1900
`Chicago, IL 60601-1293
`Telephone: (312) 368-2111
`Facsimile: (312) 236-7516
`paul.steadman@dlapiper.com
`matthew.satchwell@dlapiper.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DLA PIPER LLP (US)
`
`/s/ Denise S. Kraft
`Denise S. Kraft (DE Bar No. 2778)
`Brian A. Biggs (DE Bar No. 5591)
`1201 North Market Street, Suite 2100
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Telephone: (302) 468-5700
`Facsimile: (302) 394-2341
`denise.kraft@dlapiper.com
`brian.biggs@dlapiper.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants DENSO
`CORPORATION, and DENSO
`INTERNATIONAL AMERICA, INC.
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket