throbber
Case 1:17-cv-00297-LPS Document 1 Filed 03/20/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II LLC,
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`DENSO CORPORATION, AND
`DENSO INTERNATIONAL AMERICA, INC.,
`
`
`
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`:
`
`Civil Action No.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`Intellectual Ventures II LLC (“IV” or “Plaintiff’), brings this action for patent
`
`infringement against Defendants Denso Corporation and Denso International America, Inc.
`
`(“Denso” or “Defendants”), and alleges as follows:
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is an action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United
`
`States, Title 35 of the United States Code. IV seeks remedies for Defendants’ infringement of
`
`IV’s U.S. Patent No. 7,067,952 (“the ’952 Patent” or the “Patent-in-Suit”).
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`2.
`
`Intellectual Ventures II LLC is a Delaware limited liability company, with a
`
`principal place of business at 3150 139th Ave. SE, Bldg. 4, Bellevue, WA 98005.
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, Denso Corporation is a corporation organized and
`
`existing under the laws of Japan, with its principal place of business at 1-1, Showacho, Kariya,
`
`Aichi, 448-0029, Japan.
`
`4.
`
`Upon information and belief, Denso International America, Inc. is a Michigan
`
`corporation headquartered at 24777 Denso Drive, Southfield, MI 48033.
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00297-LPS Document 1 Filed 03/20/17 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 2
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`This action arises under the Patent Act, 35 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.
`
`Subject matter jurisdiction is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
`
`Venue in this district is proper under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1400(b) and 1391(b) and (c).
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over Denso by virtue of, inter alia, (i)
`
`1338.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`maintaining a regular place of business and a continuing presence in this jurisdiction; (ii)
`
`committing at least a portion of the infringements alleged herein within this district; and (iii)
`
`regularly doing business or soliciting business, engaging in other persistent courses of conduct
`
`and/or deriving substantial revenue from goods and services provided to individuals in this
`
`district.
`
`THE PATENT
`
`9.
`
`United States Patent No. 7,067,952 is entitled “Stator assembly made from a
`
`molded web of core segments and motor using same,” and issued June 27, 2006 to inventor
`
`Griffith D. Neal. The ’952 Patent issued from United States Patent Application No. 10/383,219
`
`filed on March 5, 2003. The ’952 Patent claims priority to U.S. Patent No. 7,036,207 filed on
`
`March 2, 2001. A copy of the ’952 Patent is attached as Exhibit 1.
`
`10.
`
` IV is the lawful assignee and owner of all right, title, and interest in and to the
`
`’952 Patent.
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF THE PATENT-IN-SUIT
`
`11.
`
`Denso has infringed and continues to infringe at least one of IV’s patents that
`
`cover aspects of electric motors and other products, including, without limitation the Denso
`
`Power Steering Motor with Toyota part number 89650-33680 (the “Exemplary Denso Product”).
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00297-LPS Document 1 Filed 03/20/17 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 3
`
`12.
`
`IV incorporates by reference in its allegations herein certain claim charts
`
`comparing exemplary claims of the Patent-in-Suit to the Exemplary Denso Product.
`
`13.
`
`Specifically, Exhibit 2 is a chart comparing claims of the Patent-in-Suit to the
`
`Exemplary Denso Product.
`
`14.
`
`As set forth in Exhibit 2, the Exemplary Denso Product practices, in whole or in
`
`material part, the technology claimed by the Patent-in-Suit.
`
`COUNT I
`
`(Denso’s Infringement of the ’952 Patent)
`
`Paragraphs 1 through 14 are incorporated by reference as if fully restated herein.
`
`IV is the assignee and lawful owner of all right, title and interest in and to the
`
`The ’952 Patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`Denso has infringed, and is still infringing, the ’952 Patent in at least this District
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`’952 Patent.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`by making, using, offering to sell, selling and/or importing Accused Products that infringe at
`
`least claims 10 and 12 of the ’952 Patent (the “Exemplary ’952 Patent Claims”) literally or by
`
`the doctrine of equivalents.
`
`19.
`
`On information and belief, Denso directly infringes the ’952 Patent by designing,
`
`manufacturing, and selling the Exemplary Denso Product.
`
`20.
`
`Exhibit 2 includes a chart comparing exemplary claims 10 and 12 of the ’952
`
`Patent to the Exemplary Denso Product. As set forth in these charts, the Exemplary Denso
`
`Product practices, in whole or in material part, the technology claimed by the ’952 Patent.
`
`Accordingly, the Exemplary Denso Product infringes at least exemplary claims 10 and 12 of the
`
`’952 Patent.
`
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00297-LPS Document 1 Filed 03/20/17 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 4
`
`21.
`
`IV is entitled to recover damages adequate to compensate for Denso’s
`
`infringement.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests the following relief:
`
`a)
`
`b)
`
`and
`
`g)
`
`A judgment that the ’952 Patent is valid and enforceable.
`
`A judgment that Defendants have infringed one or more claims of the ’952 Patent;
`
`A judgment that awards Plaintiff all appropriate damages under 35 U.S.C. § 284
`
`for Defendants’ past infringement, and any continuing or future infringement of the
`
`Patents-in-Suit, up until the date such judgment is entered, including pre or post judgment
`
`interest, costs, and disbursements as justified under 35 U.S.C. § 284 and, if necessary, to
`
`adequately compensate Plaintiff for Defendants’ infringement, an accounting:
`
`i.
`
`that this case be declared exceptional within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285 and
`
`that Plaintiff be awarded its reasonable attorneys’ fees against Defendants that it
`
`incurs in prosecuting this action;
`
`ii. that Plaintiff be awarded costs, and expenses that it incurs in prosecuting this
`
`action; and
`
`iii. that Plaintiff be awarded such further relief at law or in equity as the Court deems
`
`just and proper.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`Plaintiff hereby demands trial by jury on all claims and issues so triable.
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:17-cv-00297-LPS Document 1 Filed 03/20/17 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 5
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`FARNAN LLP
`
`
`/s/ Brian E. Farnan
`Brian Farnan (Bar No. 4089)
`Michael J. Farnan (Bar No. 5165)
`919 North Market Street,12th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Phone: 302-777-0300
`Fax: 302-777-0301
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`
`
`
` Attorneys for INTELLECTUAL
`VENTURES II LLC
`
`Dated: March 20, 2017
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`James M. Wodarski
`Michael T. Renaud
`Brad M. Scheller
`Andrew H. DeVoogd
`Nicholas W. Armington
`Serge Subach
`MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS
` GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
`Boston, MA 02111
`Tel: 617-542-6000
`Fax: 617-542-2241
`
`Aarti Shah
`MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS
` GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
`701 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
`Suite 900
`Washington, DC 20004
`Tel: 202-434-7300
`Fax: 202-434-7400
`
`
`- 5 -
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket