throbber
Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 81-1 Filed 08/15/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 702
`
`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 81-1 Filed 08/15/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 702Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 81-1 Filed 08/15/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 702
`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 81-1 Filed 08/15/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 702
`
`EXHIBIT A
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT AEXHIBIT AEXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 81-1 Filed 08/15/18 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 703
`
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Todd S Werner; Shelleaha L Jonas
`Regorafenib; Scott, Ian; Kouyoumdjian, Philip Y.; Karen Keller; Nate Hoeschen; Jack B. Blumenfeld; Dov P.
`Grossman; Jessica B. Rydstrom; Bowers, Seth; Kenneth L. Dorsney; Derek J. Fahnestock; Anthony D. Raucci;
`Bayer-Stivarga
`Wednesday, August 15, 2018 10:40:32 AM
`image001.png
`
`Todd,
`
`To address your questions:
`
`Onyx Litigation
`
`We are withholding the Cockburn and Rao materials and Onyx Bates stamped exhibits mentioned in
`my email pursuant to Amgen’s instructions. Regarding the Onyx fact witness materials, we disagree
`with you on the relevance and proportionality of your request. And as we have previously explained,
`those documents are extremely likely to contain Onyx confidential information.
`
`Mylan Litigation
`
`Regarding the Grossbard and O’Dwyer materials, we understand you to be asking for redacted or
`excerpted expert reports, deposition transcripts, and exhibits. Because Mylan would need to
`authorize the production of those materials, you should ask Mylan for those materials directly.
`Assuming Mylan approves, we have no objection to the production of that information pursuant to
`the protective order in this case, provided that we also receive a copy of any redacted or excerpted
`materials that Mylan agrees to produce.
`
`Best wishes,
`
`Ben Picozzi
`Associate | Williams & Connolly LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20005
`(P) 202-434-5266 | (F) 202-434-5029
`bpicozzi@wc.com | www.wc.com
`
`From: Todd S Werner [mailto:TWerner@carlsoncaspers.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 8:20 PM
`To: Picozzi, Ben <BPicozzi@wc.com>; Shelleaha L Jonas <SJonas@carlsoncaspers.com>
`Cc: Regorafenib <Regorafenib@carlsoncaspers.com>; Scott, Ian <iscott@taftlaw.com>;
`Kouyoumdjian, Philip Y. <pkouyoumdjian@taftlaw.com>; Karen Keller <kkeller@shawkeller.com>;
`Nate Hoeschen <nhoeschen@shawkeller.com>; Jack B. Blumenfeld <jblumenfeld@mnat.com>;
`Grossman, Dov <DGrossman@wc.com>; Rydstrom, Jessica <JRydstrom@wc.com>; Bowers, Seth
`<SBowers@wc.com>; Kenneth L. Dorsney <kdorsney@morrisjames.com>; Derek J. Fahnestock
`<dfahnestock@mnat.com>; Anthony D. Raucci <araucci@mnat.com>; Bayer-Stivarga
`<BayerStivarga@wc.com>
`Subject: RE: Bayer v. Teva 16-1221 - Third Party Confidentiality
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 81-1 Filed 08/15/18 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 704
`
`
`
`Ben:
`
`Onyx Litigation
`
`As you can appreciate, we need to know which of these documents are being withheld based on
`instructions from Onyx, versus those being withheld for some other reason. For all documents being
`withheld, including exhibits to transcripts, please specify whether Onyx has instructed you to
`withhold those documents.
`
`To the extent your objection is relevance, as appears to be the case for Onyx fact witnesses, I would
`remind you that we have said we are only seeking transcripts/reports/exhibits from witnesses
`offering testimony concerning certain issues (R&D, marketing and sales of commercial embodiments
`of the ‘834 patent).
`
`Mylan Litigation
`
`With respect to the two outstanding Mylan experts, our question was simply whether Bayer will
`produce the portions of their expert reports, deposition transcripts, and exhibits addressing
`objective indicia of non-obviousness relating to Bayer’s Nexavar product if Mylan is agreeable to
`such a production. Please provide Bayer’s position on this issue, and the information requested
`above, by noon tomorrow.
`
`Thanks,
`
`Todd
`
`
`Todd S Werner
`Carlson Caspers
`225 S. Sixth St., Suite 4200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Direct: 612.436.9655
`Cell: 612.201.4801
`TWerner@carlsoncaspers.com
`carlsoncaspers.com
`BIO | vCard | Disclaimers
`
`From: Picozzi, Ben [mailto:BPicozzi@wc.com]
`Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2018 4:50 PM
`To: Shelleaha L Jonas
`Cc: Regorafenib; Scott, Ian; Kouyoumdjian, Philip Y.; Karen Keller; Nate Hoeschen; Jack B. Blumenfeld;
`Dov P. Grossman; Jessica B. Rydstrom; Bowers, Seth; Kenneth L. Dorsney; Derek J. Fahnestock; Anthony
`D. Raucci; Bayer-Stivarga
`Subject: RE: Bayer v. Teva 16-1221 - Third Party Confidentiality
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 81-1 Filed 08/15/18 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 705
`
`
`Shelly,
`
`It is unclear from your email precisely what you are requesting, given the information we have
`previously provided.
`
`Nevertheless, with respect to the Onyx litigation, we have produced or will shortly produce
`deposition transcripts for the Bayer fact witnesses that we understand to have been deposed in that
`proceeding. We are withholding Onyx Bates-stamped exhibits for those witnesses that contain Onyx
`confidential information.
`
`Regarding Onyx fact witnesses, the materials you have requested are not relevant to any of the
`issues you have raised and are highly likely to contain Onyx confidential information. We have
`therefore not agreed to produce them.
`
`We are withholding expert reports and deposition transcripts for Dr. Iain Cockburn (Onyx) and Dr.
`Mohan Rao (Bayer). Both of those experts addressed damages, and their materials contain Onyx
`confidential information relating to Onyx’s contractual claims. We have produced or will shortly
`produce the deposition transcripts and expert reports for the remaining Bayer and Onyx experts.
`We are withholding Onyx Bates-stamped exhibits for those witnesses that contain Onyx confidential
`information.
`
`As we have previously explained, Amgen has not given us permission to produce Onyx confidential
`information, subject to limited exceptions. If you have a contrary understanding of Amgen’s position
`based on your communications with Amgen, please state that understanding.
`
`With respect to your question regarding Dr. Grossbard and Dr. O’Dwyer’s materials, we have
`produced deposition transcripts, expert reports, and exhibits that relate to objective indicia for the
`’834 patent. We are withholding deposition transcripts and certain expert reports and exhibits that
`relate to patents that were asserted in the Mylan case, but are not asserted here, and which contain
`Mylan confidential information. Even if those materials were relevant, which they are not, we have
`not received permission from Mylan to produce them.
`
`Best,
`
`
`Ben Picozzi
`Associate | Williams & Connolly LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20005
`(P) 202-434-5266 | (F) 202-434-5029
`bpicozzi@wc.com | www.wc.com
`
`From: Shelleaha L Jonas [mailto:SJonas@carlsoncaspers.com]
`Sent: Monday, August 13, 2018 3:26 PM
`To: Picozzi, Ben <BPicozzi@wc.com>; Bowers, Seth <SBowers@wc.com>; Rydstrom, Jessica
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 81-1 Filed 08/15/18 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 706
`
`<JRydstrom@wc.com>; Grossman, Dov <DGrossman@wc.com>
`Cc: Regorafenib <Regorafenib@carlsoncaspers.com>; Kouyoumdjian, Philip Y.
`<pkouyoumdjian@taftlaw.com>; Scott, Ian <iscott@taftlaw.com>; Karen Keller
`<kkeller@shawkeller.com>; Nate Hoeschen <nhoeschen@shawkeller.com>; Jack B. Blumenfeld
`<jblumenfeld@mnat.com>; Kenneth L. Dorsney <kdorsney@morrisjames.com>; Derek J. Fahnestock
`<dfahnestock@mnat.com>; Anthony D. Raucci <araucci@mnat.com>; sjanosik@amgen.com
`Subject: Bayer v. Teva 16-1221 - Third Party Confidentiality
`
`
`Bayer Counsel,
`
`You represented in your email of July 30 that you were in the process of identifying which expert
`witness reports, deposition transcripts, and exhibits are being withheld due to Onyx confidential
`information. You similarly noted that you were identifying which Bayer fact witness transcripts and
`exhibits are being withheld due to Onyx confidential information. We understand we are at an
`impasse as to Onyx fact witness deposition transcripts and exhibits concerning the research and
`development, marketing, and sales of sorafenib and/or regorafenib.
`
`On August 2, Amgen confirmed that it has authorized the production of non-confidential information
`and selected Onyx confidential information related to the Onyx v. Bayer matter under the terms of
`the protective order in this case, and that this information either has been or will be provided to
`Teva counsel. Amgen further instructed us to contact you (Bayer) for further details. As a result,
`despite this issue having been pending for weeks, Defendants remain unaware what information is
`being withheld.
`
`In anticipation of our letter due to the Court on Wednesday, please provide the remaining
`information we requested in our email of July 25.
`
`Additionally, we have asked Mylan whether it is agreeable to Bayer producing the portions of the
`expert reports, deposition transcripts, and exhibits of Peter O’Dwyer and Michael Grossbard
`addressing objective indicia of non-obviousness relating to Bayer’s Nexavar product. To the extent
`Mylan consents to the production of this information, please confirm that Bayer will produce it.
`
`Regards,
`Shelly
`
`
`Shelleaha L Jonas
`Carlson Caspers
`225 S. Sixth St., Suite 4200
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Direct: 612.436.9607
`Cell: 612-229-7440
`SJonas@carlsoncaspers.com
`carlsoncaspers.com
`BIO | vCard | Disclaimers
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 81-1 Filed 08/15/18 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 707
`
`This message and any attachments are intended only for the addressee and may contain information that is
`privileged and confidential. If you have received this message in error, please do not read, use, copy, distribute, or
`disclose the contents of the message and any attachments. Instead, please delete the message and any attachments
`and notify the sender immediately. Thank you.
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket