throbber
Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 55 Filed 06/08/18 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 462
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-1221 (LPS)
`CONSOLIDATED
`
`BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC and BAYER
`HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS
`INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.,
`et al.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`JOINT INTERIM STATUS REPORT
`
`
`
`Pursuant to paragraph 14 of the Court’s November 13, 2017, Scheduling Order (D.I. 20),
`
`Plaintiffs Bayer HealthCare LLC and Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (collectively,
`
`“Bayer” ), and Defendants Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (“Teva”), Apotex Inc. and Apotex
`
`Corp. (“Apotex”) respectfully submit this Joint Interim Status Report.
`
`Status of the Action
`
`This is a Hatch-Waxman patent infringement action involving U.S. Patent Nos. 7,351,834
`
`(“the ’834 patent”); 8,637,553 (“the ’553 patent”); 8,680,124 (“the ’124 patent”); and 9,458,107
`
`(“the ’107 patent”), which are listed in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Orange Book in
`
`connection with Bayer’s anti-cancer drug Stivarga®.
`
`On December 16, 2016, Bayer filed a complaint against Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
`
`and Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. in C.A. No. 16-1221-LPS alleging infringement of the
`
`’834, ’553, ’124, and ’107 patents in connection with Teva’s filing of Abbreviated New Drug
`
`Application (“ANDA”) No. 209728, seeking approval to market a generic version of Stivarga®
`
`in the United States prior to the expiration of those patents. Also on December 16, 2016, Bayer
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 55 Filed 06/08/18 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 463
`
`filed a complaint against Apotex in C.A. No. 16-1222-LPS alleging infringement of the ’553
`
`patent in connection with Apotex’s filing of ANDA No. 209765.
`
`On February 3, 2017, Teva and Bayer stipulated to the dismissal of Teva Pharmaceuticals
`
`Industries Ltd. from C.A. No. 16-1221-LPS, leaving Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. as a
`
`defendant (D.I. 9).
`
`On March 28, 2017, Bayer filed a second complaint against Apotex in C.A. No. 17-0334-
`
`LPS, alleging infringement of the ’107 patent in connection with Apotex’s ANDA No. 209728
`
`seeking approval to market a generic version of Stivarga® in the United States prior to the
`
`expiration of the ’107 patent.
`
`Both Teva and Apotex have answered Bayer’s complaints (C.A. No. 16-1221-LPS,
`
`D.I. 10; C.A. No. 16-1222, D.I. 10; C.A. No. 17-334-LPS, D.I. 10). Teva asserted defenses and
`
`counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity as to the ’834, ’553, ’124, and ’107 patents.
`
`Apotex asserted defenses of non-infringement and invalidity as to the ’553 and ’107 patents.
`
`The parties stipulated to the consolidation of the three actions on December 5, 2017,
`
`under C.A. No. 16-1221-LPS (D.I. 26).
`
`The Joint Claim Construction Chart and Joint Appendix were filed on May 23, 2018
`
`(D.I. 52-53).
`
`Progress of Discovery
`
`Fact discovery is ongoing. The parties’ deadline for substantial completion of document
`
`production was May 15, 2018, and fact discovery is scheduled to close on September 4, 2018.
`
`All parties have served initial disclosures (D.I. 23, 24, 29). Bayer has served
`
`supplemental initial disclosures (D.I. 30). On December 13, 2017, Bayer provided Defendants
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 55 Filed 06/08/18 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 464
`
`with an Initial Identification of Asserted Patents and Accused Products and copies of the certified
`
`file histories for each of the asserted patents (D.I. 30).
`
`On November 22, 2017, Teva notified Bayer that it had completed its production of core
`
`technical documents. Apotex notified Bayer that it had completed its production of core
`
`technical documents on January 16, 2018.
`
`Bayer has served initial infringement claim charts for Teva’s ANDA Product and
`
`Apotex’s ANDA Product (D.I. 33, 40).
`
`Teva served Initial Invalidity Contentions on January 22, 2018. Apotex served Initial
`
`Invalidity Contentions on March 14, 2018 (D.I. 41). Bayer served its final supplementation of
`
`the Identification of All Accused Products and Asserted Claims on April 16, 2018 (D.I. 43).
`
`Teva and Apotex served their final supplementation of the Identification of All Prior
`
`Art/Invalidity References on April 23 and April 24, respectively (D.I. 45, 46).
`
`All parties have served and responded to interrogatories and requests for production of
`
`documents. Bayer has raised concerns regarding Defendants’ responses to interrogatories and
`
`requests for production beginning on February 21, 2018. Defendants have raised concerns with
`
`Plaintiffs’ responses to Request for Production beginning February 8, 2018. There have been
`
`numerous meet and confers since, but some of the parties’ concerns with respect to the other
`
`side’s discovery responses remain. Plaintiffs submit that, to the extent its concerns with
`
`Defendants’ discovery responses are not resolved and are ripe for the Court’s attention, Plaintiffs
`
`will bring them to the attention of the Court through the Court’s dispute resolution procedures.
`
`Defendants’ concerns with Plaintiffs document production remain. To the extent the parties do
`
`not resolve these concerns within the next week, Defendants will bring the issues to the Court’s
`
`attention through the Court’s dispute resolution procedures.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 55 Filed 06/08/18 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 465
`
`Defendants have requested potential dates and locations for depositions of eleven of the
`
`named inventors of the patents-in-suit. In response to this recent request, Bayer responded that
`
`ten of the identified individuals are represented by counsel for Bayer, and that it will look into
`
`deposition dates and locations for the witnesses. Bayer has not been able to contact the eleventh
`
`named inventor identified by Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`/s/ Derek J. Fahnestock
`
`
`
`
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Derek J. Fahnestock (#4705)
`Anthony D. Raucci (#5948)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`dfahnestock@mnat.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs Bayer Healthcare LLC
`and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.
`
`SHAW KELLER LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MORRIS JAMES LLP
`
`/s/ Kenneth L. Dorsney
`
`
`
`
`Kenneth L. Dorsney (#3726)
`500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500
`Wilmington, DE 19801-1494
`(302) 888-6855
`kdorsney@morrisjames.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants Apotex Inc. and
`Apotex Corp.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Karen E. Keller
`
`
`
`
`John W. Shaw (#3362)
`Karen E. Keller (#4489)
`David M. Fry (#5486)
`1105 North Market Street, 12th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 298-0701
`jshaw@shawkeller.com
`kkeller@shawkeller.com
`dfry@shawkeller.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
`
`June 8, 2018
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket