`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 16-1221 (LPS)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC AND BAYER
`HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`APOTEX CORP. and APOTEX, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APOTEX’S NOTICE OF DEPOSITION TO
`PLAINTIFFS BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC AND BAYER HEALTHCARE
`PHARMACEUTICALS INC. PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6)
`
`TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure and the applicable Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the District
`
`of Delaware, Defendant Apotex Corp.; and Apotex, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Apotex”),
`
`by and through their attorneys, will take depositions upon oral examination of Plaintiffs Bayer
`
`Healthcare LLC and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “Bayer”)
`
`at a mutually agreed upon date and time by the parties and continuing from day to day thereafter
`
`until completed. The depositions will be conducted before an officer authorized by law to
`
`administer oaths and will be recorded by stenographic, sound, video, audiovisual, and/or any other
`
`appropriate means. The depositions will be taken for the purposes of discovery, for use at trial in
`
`these actions, and for any purposes permitted under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. You are
`
`invited to attend and participate.
`
`
`24625635.1
`10820197/1
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 114 Filed 03/13/19 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 863
`
`Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6), Bayer shall designate one or more knowledgeable
`
`persons to testify on its behalf with respect to the matters set forth in Schedule A attached hereto,
`
`and the person(s) so designated shall be required to testify as to those matters known or reasonably
`
`available to Bayer. Bayer shall identify in writing each deponent who shall be designated to testify
`
`on its behalf at least ten (10) business days in advance of the deposition, including which portion(s)
`
`of this Notice each deponent is prepared to address.
`
`Date: March 13, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Kenneth L. Dorsney
`Kenneth L. Dorsney (#3726)
`MORRIS JAMES LLP
`500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500
`Wilmington, DE 19801-1494
`(302) 888-6855
`Kdorsney@morrisjames.com
`
`Stephen R. Auten
`Richard T. Ruzich
`Philip Y. Kouyoumdjian
`Ian Scott
`Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
`111 East Wacker Drive, Suite 2800
`Chicago, IL 60601
`312-527-4000
`sauten@taftlaw.com
`rruzich@taftlaw.com
`iscott@taftlaw.com
`pkouyoumdjian@taftlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Apotex Inc. and
`Apotex Corp.
`
`
`
`
`24625635.1
`10820197/1
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 114 Filed 03/13/19 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 864
`
`Schedule A
`
`
`24625635.1
`10820197/1
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 114 Filed 03/13/19 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 865
`
`SCHEDULE A
`
`DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
`
`Defendants hereby incorporate by reference, as though fully set forth herein, the
`
`Definitions set forth in Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-6) and First Set of Requests
`
`for Production (Nos. 1-89).
`
`The following terms are to be interpreted in accordance with these definitions:
`
`1.
`
`“Regorafenib monohydrate” shall mean 4-[4-({[4-chloro-3-(trifluoromethyl)
`
`phenyl]carbamoyl}lamino)-3-fluorophenoxy]-N-methylpyridine-2-carboxamide monohydrate
`
`and/or
`
`.
`
`DEPOSITION TOPICS
`
`1.
`
`The conception, development, and reduction to practice of the subject matter of the
`
`asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,957,232 (“the ’232 patent”).
`
`2.
`
`The preparation, filing, and prosecution of the ’232 patent and any related
`
`application, including the identification of persons and other entities involved during such
`
`prosecution, any third-party observations submitted, any declarations submitted on behalf of Bayer
`
`or the inventors, and the earliest claimed priority date for each claim of the patents-in-suit asserted
`
`in the present litigations.
`
`3.
`
`Data and information used as the basis for the statements made in the patents-in-
`
`suit (including all examples and tables) and during prosecution with the USPTO of the applications
`
`
`24625635.1
`10820197/1
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 114 Filed 03/13/19 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 866
`
`that led to the patents-in-suit and related applications, including but not limited to all facts, data,
`
`results, testing, experimental conditions, or protocols.
`
`4.
`
`The preparation, filing, and prosecution of European Patent Application No.
`
`06021296.6 (the “1296 application”) and any related application, the identification of persons and
`
`other entities involved during such prosecution, any third-party observations submitted, and any
`
`declarations submitted on behalf of Bayer or the inventors.
`
`5.
`
`Data and information used as the basis for the statements made in the 1296
`
`application, including but not limited to all examples and tables referred to in the application and
`
`during prosecution with the European Patent Office of the applications that led to WO
`
`2008/043446 and related applications, including but not limited to all facts, data, results, testing,
`
`experimental conditions, or protocols.
`
`6.
`
`The first synthesis of regorafenib monohydrate, including when, how, and by whom
`
`the synthesis occurred.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`The preclinical and clinical studies identified in NDA No. 203085.
`
`The bases for the data set forth in Tables 1-7 in the 1296 application.
`
`Any licenses, settlement agreements and other contracts between Bayer and Onyx
`
`concerning the patents-in-suit, including negotiations, attempts to license, or offers to license one
`
`or more of the patents or any product embodying any of the claims of the ’232 patent.
`
`10.
`
`The basis for the selection of regorafenib monohydrate for further development
`
`efforts, including but not limited to the experimental data concerning the safety and efficacy of
`
`regorafenib monohydrate relative to other compounds considered or relied upon in support of that
`
`decision(s).
`
`
`24625635.1
`10820197/1
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 114 Filed 03/13/19 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 867
`
`11.
`
`The decision to develop regorafenib monohydrate as a commercial pharmaceutical
`
`product, including but not limited to the decisions whether to pursue indications for the treatment
`
`of hyper-proliferative disorders, including but not limited to solid tumors, lymphomas, sarcomas,
`
`leukemias, cancers of the breast, respiratory tract, brain, reproductive organs, digestive tract,
`
`urinary tract, eye, liver, skin, head and neck, thyroid and/or parathyroid.
`
`12.
`
`The first use of regorafenib monohydrate to treat each of the diseases or conditions
`
`referenced in asserted claim 2 of the ’232 patent and documents concerning the same.
`
`13.
`
`The first use of regorafenib monohydrate in an in vivo study, including when, how,
`
`and why.
`
`14.
`
`The first use of regorafenib monohydrate in humans, including when, how, and
`
`why.
`
`15.
`
`Experiments, analyses, and data resulting from testing assessing the efficacy of
`
`regorafenib monohydrate to treat hyper-proliferative disorders, including but not limited to solid
`
`tumors, lymphomas, sarcomas, leukemias, cancers of the breast, respiratory tract, brain,
`
`reproductive organs, digestive tract, urinary tract, eye, liver, skin, head and neck, thyroid and/or
`
`parathyroid.
`
`16.
`
`All experiments performed by Bayer that assessed, directly or indirectly, the
`
`efficacy of regorafenib monohydrate to treat hyper-proliferative disorders, including but not
`
`limited to solid tumors, lymphomas, sarcomas, leukemias, cancers of the breast, respiratory tract,
`
`brain, reproductive organs, digestive tract, urinary tract, eye, liver, skin, head and neck, thyroid
`
`and/or parathyroid.
`
`
`24625635.1
`10820197/1
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 114 Filed 03/13/19 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 868
`
`17.
`
`The determination of the amounts of regorafenib monohydrate required to treat the
`
`cancers of claim 2 of the ’232 patent, including the tests performed in order to make that
`
`determination, as well as when and by whom those tests were conducted and documents
`
`concerning those efforts.
`
`18.
`
`The factual basis for any alleged objective indicia of nonobviousness concerning
`
`the ’232 patent, including, but not limited to:
`
`A.
`
`unexpected properties or advantages of the subject matter of the patents-in-
`
`suit;
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`E.
`
`F.
`
`G.
`
`H.
`
`commercial success of the subject matter of the patents-in-suit and sales;
`
`long-felt need met by the subject matter of the patents-in-suit;
`
`prior failure of others to solve any problem to which the subject matter of
`
`the patents-in-suit would be considered a solution;
`
`skepticism regarding the subject matter of the patents-in-suit;
`
`copying by others of the subject matter of the patents-in-suit;
`
`praise by others for the subject matter of the patents-in-suit; and,
`
`acceptance by doctors of the subject matter of the patents-in-suit.
`
`
`
`
`24625635.1
`10820197/1
`
`4
`
`