throbber
Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 114 Filed 03/13/19 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 862
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 16-1221 (LPS)
`
` )
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC AND BAYER
`HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`APOTEX CORP. and APOTEX, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APOTEX’S NOTICE OF DEPOSITION TO
`PLAINTIFFS BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC AND BAYER HEALTHCARE
`PHARMACEUTICALS INC. PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(6)
`
`TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
`
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure and the applicable Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the District
`
`of Delaware, Defendant Apotex Corp.; and Apotex, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Apotex”),
`
`by and through their attorneys, will take depositions upon oral examination of Plaintiffs Bayer
`
`Healthcare LLC and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “Bayer”)
`
`at a mutually agreed upon date and time by the parties and continuing from day to day thereafter
`
`until completed. The depositions will be conducted before an officer authorized by law to
`
`administer oaths and will be recorded by stenographic, sound, video, audiovisual, and/or any other
`
`appropriate means. The depositions will be taken for the purposes of discovery, for use at trial in
`
`these actions, and for any purposes permitted under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. You are
`
`invited to attend and participate.
`
`
`24625635.1
`10820197/1
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 114 Filed 03/13/19 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 863
`
`Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6), Bayer shall designate one or more knowledgeable
`
`persons to testify on its behalf with respect to the matters set forth in Schedule A attached hereto,
`
`and the person(s) so designated shall be required to testify as to those matters known or reasonably
`
`available to Bayer. Bayer shall identify in writing each deponent who shall be designated to testify
`
`on its behalf at least ten (10) business days in advance of the deposition, including which portion(s)
`
`of this Notice each deponent is prepared to address.
`
`Date: March 13, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/Kenneth L. Dorsney
`Kenneth L. Dorsney (#3726)
`MORRIS JAMES LLP
`500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500
`Wilmington, DE 19801-1494
`(302) 888-6855
`Kdorsney@morrisjames.com
`
`Stephen R. Auten
`Richard T. Ruzich
`Philip Y. Kouyoumdjian
`Ian Scott
`Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP
`111 East Wacker Drive, Suite 2800
`Chicago, IL 60601
`312-527-4000
`sauten@taftlaw.com
`rruzich@taftlaw.com
`iscott@taftlaw.com
`pkouyoumdjian@taftlaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Apotex Inc. and
`Apotex Corp.
`
`
`
`
`24625635.1
`10820197/1
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 114 Filed 03/13/19 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 864
`
`Schedule A
`
`
`24625635.1
`10820197/1
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 114 Filed 03/13/19 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 865
`
`SCHEDULE A
`
`DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
`
`Defendants hereby incorporate by reference, as though fully set forth herein, the
`
`Definitions set forth in Defendants’ First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-6) and First Set of Requests
`
`for Production (Nos. 1-89).
`
`The following terms are to be interpreted in accordance with these definitions:
`
`1.
`
`“Regorafenib monohydrate” shall mean 4-[4-({[4-chloro-3-(trifluoromethyl)
`
`phenyl]carbamoyl}lamino)-3-fluorophenoxy]-N-methylpyridine-2-carboxamide monohydrate
`
`and/or
`
`.
`
`DEPOSITION TOPICS
`
`1.
`
`The conception, development, and reduction to practice of the subject matter of the
`
`asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,957,232 (“the ’232 patent”).
`
`2.
`
`The preparation, filing, and prosecution of the ’232 patent and any related
`
`application, including the identification of persons and other entities involved during such
`
`prosecution, any third-party observations submitted, any declarations submitted on behalf of Bayer
`
`or the inventors, and the earliest claimed priority date for each claim of the patents-in-suit asserted
`
`in the present litigations.
`
`3.
`
`Data and information used as the basis for the statements made in the patents-in-
`
`suit (including all examples and tables) and during prosecution with the USPTO of the applications
`
`
`24625635.1
`10820197/1
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 114 Filed 03/13/19 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 866
`
`that led to the patents-in-suit and related applications, including but not limited to all facts, data,
`
`results, testing, experimental conditions, or protocols.
`
`4.
`
`The preparation, filing, and prosecution of European Patent Application No.
`
`06021296.6 (the “1296 application”) and any related application, the identification of persons and
`
`other entities involved during such prosecution, any third-party observations submitted, and any
`
`declarations submitted on behalf of Bayer or the inventors.
`
`5.
`
`Data and information used as the basis for the statements made in the 1296
`
`application, including but not limited to all examples and tables referred to in the application and
`
`during prosecution with the European Patent Office of the applications that led to WO
`
`2008/043446 and related applications, including but not limited to all facts, data, results, testing,
`
`experimental conditions, or protocols.
`
`6.
`
`The first synthesis of regorafenib monohydrate, including when, how, and by whom
`
`the synthesis occurred.
`
`7.
`
`8.
`
`9.
`
`The preclinical and clinical studies identified in NDA No. 203085.
`
`The bases for the data set forth in Tables 1-7 in the 1296 application.
`
`Any licenses, settlement agreements and other contracts between Bayer and Onyx
`
`concerning the patents-in-suit, including negotiations, attempts to license, or offers to license one
`
`or more of the patents or any product embodying any of the claims of the ’232 patent.
`
`10.
`
`The basis for the selection of regorafenib monohydrate for further development
`
`efforts, including but not limited to the experimental data concerning the safety and efficacy of
`
`regorafenib monohydrate relative to other compounds considered or relied upon in support of that
`
`decision(s).
`
`
`24625635.1
`10820197/1
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 114 Filed 03/13/19 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 867
`
`11.
`
`The decision to develop regorafenib monohydrate as a commercial pharmaceutical
`
`product, including but not limited to the decisions whether to pursue indications for the treatment
`
`of hyper-proliferative disorders, including but not limited to solid tumors, lymphomas, sarcomas,
`
`leukemias, cancers of the breast, respiratory tract, brain, reproductive organs, digestive tract,
`
`urinary tract, eye, liver, skin, head and neck, thyroid and/or parathyroid.
`
`12.
`
`The first use of regorafenib monohydrate to treat each of the diseases or conditions
`
`referenced in asserted claim 2 of the ’232 patent and documents concerning the same.
`
`13.
`
`The first use of regorafenib monohydrate in an in vivo study, including when, how,
`
`and why.
`
`14.
`
`The first use of regorafenib monohydrate in humans, including when, how, and
`
`why.
`
`15.
`
`Experiments, analyses, and data resulting from testing assessing the efficacy of
`
`regorafenib monohydrate to treat hyper-proliferative disorders, including but not limited to solid
`
`tumors, lymphomas, sarcomas, leukemias, cancers of the breast, respiratory tract, brain,
`
`reproductive organs, digestive tract, urinary tract, eye, liver, skin, head and neck, thyroid and/or
`
`parathyroid.
`
`16.
`
`All experiments performed by Bayer that assessed, directly or indirectly, the
`
`efficacy of regorafenib monohydrate to treat hyper-proliferative disorders, including but not
`
`limited to solid tumors, lymphomas, sarcomas, leukemias, cancers of the breast, respiratory tract,
`
`brain, reproductive organs, digestive tract, urinary tract, eye, liver, skin, head and neck, thyroid
`
`and/or parathyroid.
`
`
`24625635.1
`10820197/1
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-01221-LPS Document 114 Filed 03/13/19 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 868
`
`17.
`
`The determination of the amounts of regorafenib monohydrate required to treat the
`
`cancers of claim 2 of the ’232 patent, including the tests performed in order to make that
`
`determination, as well as when and by whom those tests were conducted and documents
`
`concerning those efforts.
`
`18.
`
`The factual basis for any alleged objective indicia of nonobviousness concerning
`
`the ’232 patent, including, but not limited to:
`
`A.
`
`unexpected properties or advantages of the subject matter of the patents-in-
`
`suit;
`
`B.
`
`C.
`
`D.
`
`E.
`
`F.
`
`G.
`
`H.
`
`commercial success of the subject matter of the patents-in-suit and sales;
`
`long-felt need met by the subject matter of the patents-in-suit;
`
`prior failure of others to solve any problem to which the subject matter of
`
`the patents-in-suit would be considered a solution;
`
`skepticism regarding the subject matter of the patents-in-suit;
`
`copying by others of the subject matter of the patents-in-suit;
`
`praise by others for the subject matter of the patents-in-suit; and,
`
`acceptance by doctors of the subject matter of the patents-in-suit.
`
`
`
`
`24625635.1
`10820197/1
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket