throbber
Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 26 PageID #: 1409
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-00830-RGA
`
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`SIPCO, LLC, and IP CO., LLC (d/b/a
`INTUS IQ)
`
` Plaintiff,
`
` v.
`
`STREETLINE, INC.; KAPSCH
`TRAFFICCOM HOLDING CORP.; and
`KAPSCH TRAFFICCOM U.S. CORP.
`
` Defendants.
`
`SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This is an action for patent infringement in which Plaintiffs SIPCO, LLC and IP CO.,
`
`LLC (“Plaintiffs”) complains against Defendants Streetline, Inc., Kapsch Trafficcom Holding
`
`Corp. and Kapsch Trafficcom U.S. Corp., all upon information and belief, as follows:
`
`PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff SIPCO, LLC (“SIPCO”) is a limited liability company organized and
`
`existing under the laws of the State of Georgia, having its principal office at 2600 Abbey Court,
`
`Alpharetta, Georgia, 30004.
`
`2.
`
`IP CO, LLC (d/b/a INTUS IQ) (“IP CO”) is a limited liability company organized
`
`and existing under the laws of the State of Georgia, having its principal office at 8215 Roswell
`
`Road, Building 900, Suite 950, Atlanta, Georgia 30350.
`
`3.
`
`Defendant Streetline Inc. is a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware,
`
`with its principal place of business located at 1200 Park Place, San Mateo, CA 94403
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 2 of 26 PageID #: 1410
`
`(“Streetline”). Streetline may be served with process by serving its registered agent,
`
`Incorporating Services, Ltd., 3600 S Dupont Highway, Dover, DE 19901.
`
`4.
`
`Defendant Kapsch Trafficcom Holding Corp. is a corporation organized under the
`
`laws of Delaware, with its principal place of business in McLean, Virginia, and may be served
`
`with process by serving its registered agent, The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust
`
`Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, DE 19801. Kapsch Trafficcom Holding Corp, is a
`
`wholly-owned subsidiary of Kapsch TrafficCom B.V., of Amsterdam, Netherlands, which is a
`
`wholly-owned subsidiary of Kapsch TrafficCom AG, of Vienna, Austria, a publicly held
`
`corporation.
`
`5.
`
`On or about April 16, 2015, Kapsch Trafficcom Holding Corp. acquired a
`
`majority and controlling interest in Streetline, so that Streetline operates as a wholly-owned
`
`subsidiary of Kapsch Trafficcom Holding Corp.
`
`6.
`
`Defendant Kapsch Trafficcom U.S. Corp. is a corporation organized under the
`
`laws of Delaware, with its principal place of business located at 1200 Park Place, San Mateo, CA
`
`94403 (“Streetline”). Kapsch Trafficcom U.S. Corp. may be served with process by serving its
`
`registered agent, The Corporation Trust Company., Corporation Trust Center 1209 Orange
`
`Street, Wilmington, DE 19801.
`
`7.
`
`Kapsch Trafficcom Holding Corp.and Kapsch Trafficcom U.S. Corp. may
`
`hereafter be collectively referenced as “Kapsch Defendants.”
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`8.
`
`This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of the
`
`United States Code. Thus, this Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 3 of 26 PageID #: 1411
`
`1331 and 1338(a).
`
`9.
`
`This Court has personal jurisdiction over all Defendants by virtue of the
`
`Defendants being corporations created and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware.
`
`10.
`
`Venue is proper in this Judicial District as to each Defendant under 28 U.S.C. §§
`
`1391(c) and 1400(b) by virtue of the Defendants being corporations created and existing under
`
`the laws of the State of Delaware.
`
`PLAINTIFFS
`
`11.
`
`SIPCO and IP CO are small research, development and technology companies
`
`based in Atlanta, Georgia. T. David Petite is a founding member of both companies.
`
`12.
`
`In the 1990’s, through his own individual research and development efforts, Mr.
`
`Petite invented a large number of wireless control and distribution technology applications. The
`
`inventions resulting from Mr. Petite’s efforts include, but are not limited to, various ways of
`
`moving data as economically and seamlessly as possible over both wired and wireless networks.
`
`13.
`
`Through the 1990’s and early 2000’s investors contributed tens of millions of
`
`dollars for technology development and implementation of networks. Clients included Georgia
`
`Power, Alabama Power, Newnan Utilities GA, Johnson Controls, Synovus Bank and Grand
`
`Court Lifestyles residential living facilities.
`
`14.
`
`After proving that the technology worked in the field, several companies
`
`competed to purchase an exclusive license to Mr. Petite’s technology for the market known as
`
`“smart grid.” Landis+Gyr (http://www.landisgyr.com/) (previously Siemens Metering) took an
`
`exclusive license to the smart grid technology in 2002 and in 2005 purchased rights to the
`
`technology for utility applications for $30,000,000. Mr. Petite’s technology has been deployed
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 3 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 4 of 26 PageID #: 1412
`
`in millions of meters deployed across North America and throughout the world.
`
`15.
`
`SIPCO retained the rights to the mesh network patents, and for use of the
`
`technology outside of the utility space. It still maintains ownership of the software, firmware,
`
`hardware and patent portfolio that resulted from Mr. Petite’s research and development efforts,
`
`and SIPCO continues to develop and deploy wireless technology applications and wireless
`
`technology systems throughout the United States.
`
`16.
`
`SIPCO’s patent portfolios (of which the patents in suit are a part) include
`
`inventions that are widely recognized as pioneering in various fields of use. As a result, over 75
`
`corporations have taken licenses to them. Licensees include companies operating in the vertical
`
`markets of Industrial Controls, Smart Grid, Building Automation, Network Backhaul, Home
`
`Appliance, Home Automation and Entertainment, Sensor Monitoring, and Internet Service
`
`Provisioning. Licensed products include products using standard wireless mesh protocols such as
`
`WirelessHART, ZigBee, IEEE 802.15.4, Z-Wave, and as well as proprietary wireless protocols
`
`such as that marketed by Enocean.
`
`DEFENDANTS
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`Streetline provides a parking management solution to governmental entities.
`
`The solution includes hardware such as gateways (or gateway servers), repeaters
`
`and parking sensors. Streetline’s parking sensors are sealed mechanical units mounted in or on a
`
`pavement surface which contain an array of sensing components and logic to manage the
`
`collection of data at the individual parking space regarding the presence of an automobile in a
`
`parking location, and have been provided as V2ISL-EPS – Imbedded Vehicle Sensor and V2ISL-
`
`SPS – Surface Mount Vehicle Sensor. Streetline repeater has been provided as V2ISL-RPP -
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 4 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 5 of 26 PageID #: 1413
`
`Sensor Repeater. The parking management hardware, including the above sensors, repeaters and
`
`gateways are collectively referred to as “Streetline Equipment.”
`
`19.
`
`The Streetline Equipment integrates, and the term “Streetline Equipment”
`
`includes, “motes-on-a-chip” supplied by the Dust Networks group of Linear Technology
`
`Corporation, which “motes-on-a-chip” are fully compliant to the WirelessHART (IEC62591)
`
`and IEEE 802.15.4e wireless mesh networking standards to form fully redundant wireless self-
`
`forming, self-healing multi-hop mesh network of nodes or motes to monitor and to collect and
`
`relay data, and specifically meet the standards for IEEE Std 802.15.4-2006, Wireless Medium
`
`Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Low-Rate Wireless
`
`Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs), and are represented by the ultralow power, LTC5800
`
`and/or LTP5903 System-on-Chip. The Dust Networks system is referred to as “Smartmesh.”
`
`SmartMesh allows Streetline to reliably transmit street-level data in real time to their web-based
`
`suite of parking management applications. The typical application utilizing the LTC5800 and/or
`
`LTP5903 system-on-a-chip, is generally shown below, and does represent the Streetline solution:
`
`
`
`
`
`20.
`
`The Streetline solution also includes several application programs and interfaces,
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 5 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 6 of 26 PageID #: 1414
`
`which include Parker (which guides drivers to available parking spaces), ParkerMap (a free
`
`service for city merchants that enables them to provide real-time parking information to their
`
`patrons, and which can be embedded on a merchant’s website and automatically updates with the
`
`latest parking information to ease shoppers’ planning process), ParkEdge (a self-publishing tool
`
`that enables public and private off-street parking to publish their parking garage and lot
`
`locations, space inventory, rates, hours, and availability in real-time), Enforcement (a mobile
`
`application that enables the City and its enforcement team to improve Streetline’s compliance
`
`and achieve optimal turnover), ParkSight Analytics™ (a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) which
`
`provides parking data that can be accessed 24/7 with a secure login credential via the web)
`
`and/or ParkingData (which provides access to data for parking locations and availability through
`
`two complementary APIs) (collectively, “Streetline Programs”).
`
`21.
`
`The overall Streetline solution is hereafter referred to as “Smart Parking,” and it is
`
`depicted as the following image provided by Streetline:
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 6 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 7 of 26 PageID #: 1415
`
`
`
`
`
`22.
`
`Defendants Kapsch Trafficcom Holding Corp.; and Kapsch Trafficcom U.S.
`
`Corp. have jointly marketed, and induced third-parties to acquire and use, the Streetline Smart
`
`Parking solution in this country. An example of the marketing is reflected in on Kapsch website
`
`at:
`
`https://www.kapsch.net/us/ktc/Portfolio/Intelligent-Mobility-Solutions/Smart-Urban-
`Mobility/Smart-Parking
`
`23.
`
`The Kapsch website shows:
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 7 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 8 of 26 PageID #: 1416
`
`
`
`
`
`24.
`
`The Kapsch website specifically states that “Our offerings include …
`
` Analysis: Comprehensive solutions for real-time analysis of parking situations within
`defined areas.
` Fee collection: Automated solutions for collecting parking fees based upon different
`criteria, such as time of day or authorization levels (e.g. for handicapped drivers).
` Navigation to nearest parking space: Our applications guide road users directly to the
`nearest available parking space.
` Parking space management: With our solutions, we can collect real-time parking
`situation data and make this information available in online applications, from digital
`displays to websites and apps.
` Sensors: Our sensors not only detect open parking spaces, they can also measure noise
`levels or road temperature and make this data available for intelligent traffic
`management.
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 8 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 9 of 26 PageID #: 1417
`
`These are all descriptions of the Streetline Smart Parking systems.
`
`25.
`
`The above webpage indicates that the copyright holder as of 2009 had been
`
`“Copyright Kapsch TrafficCom U.S. Corp.” The “Terms and Conditions” identify “Kapsch
`
`TrafficCom” as the owner of the website.
`
`26.
`
`The filing of the original Complaint constituted notice in accordance with 35
`
`U.S.C. § 287 with respect to all the Patents asserted in this case. Despite such notice, the
`
`Defendants continue to import into, market, offer for sale and/or sell in the United States the
`
`Streetline Equipment and Streetline Programs (“Streetline System”), and have induced and are
`
`inducing persons to use the Streetline Equipment and Streetline Programs, and to practice the
`
`methods of the Streetline Equipment and Streetline Programs.
`
`COUNT I
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,908,842
`
`27.
`
`Plaintiffs hereby restates and re-alleges the allegations set forth in the preceding
`
`paragraphs 1-26 and incorporates them by reference.
`
`28.
`
`Plaintiff SIPCO is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 8,908,842
`
`entitled “Multi-Functional General Purpose Transceivers and Devices.” (“the ‘842 Patent”). The
`
`‘842 Patent was duly and legally issued on December 9, 2014. A true and correct copy of the
`
`‘842 Patent is attached as Exhibit 1.
`
`29.
`
`Defendant Streetline has directly infringed and continues to infringe at least claim
`
`16 of the Patent (literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) by making, having had made,
`
`using, offering for sale and selling, or offering for use and using, a wireless network system
`
`comprising the Streetline Equipment in combination with one or more of the Streetline
`
`Programs.
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 9 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 10 of 26 PageID #: 1418
`
`30.
`
`The correspondence between the limitations of claim 16 and the Streetline
`
`Equipment are shown in the claim chart attached hereto as Exhibit 11, which is being
`
`contemporaneously filed under seal. The chart is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth
`
`herein, and each limitation is a sub-paragraph hereof.
`
`31.
`
`The Kapsch Defendants have directly infringed at least claim 16 of the Patent by
`
`either offering to sell and selling the Streetline system cited above in reference to infringement
`
`by Defendant Streetline, or at least infringed by inducing the direct infringement of the Patent by
`
`intentionally inducing persons to use the patented inventions as reflected in Paragraphs 22-25,
`
`supra. The Kapsch Defendants are thus liable for indirect infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §
`
`271(b).
`
`32.
`
`Defendants’ acts of infringement have caused and continue to cause damage to
`
`Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover from Defendants the damages sustained by Plaintiffs
`
`as a result of Defendants’ wrongful acts.
`
`COUNT II
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,625,496
`
`33.
`
`Plaintiffs hereby restates and re-alleges the allegations set forth in the preceding
`
`paragraphs 1-26 and incorporates them by reference.
`
`34.
`
`Plaintiff IP CO is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 8,625,496
`
`entitled “Wireless Network System and Method for Providing Same.” (“the ‘496 Patent”). The
`
`‘496 Patent was duly and legally issued on January 7, 2014. A true and correct copy of the ‘496
`
`Patent is attached as Exhibit 2.
`
`35.
`
`Defendant Streetline has directly infringed and continues to infringe at least claim
`
`27 of the Patent (literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) by making, having had made,
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 10 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 11 of 26 PageID #: 1419
`
`using, offering for sale and selling, or offering for use and using, a wireless network system
`
`comprising the Streetline Equipment.
`
`36.
`
`The correspondence between the limitations of claim 27 and the Streetline
`
`Equipment are shown in the claim chart attached hereto as Exhibit 12, which is being
`
`contemporaneously filed under seal. The chart is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth
`
`herein, and each limitation is a sub-paragraph hereof.
`
`37.
`
`Defendant Streetline has directly infringed and continue to infringe at least claim
`
`11 of the Patent (literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) by practicing the method of
`
`providing wireless network communication through the implementation and use of Streetline
`
`Equipment.
`
`38.
`
`The correspondence between the limitations of claim 11 and the accused
`
`Streetline method are shown in the claim chart attached hereto as Exhibit 12.
`
`39.
`
`Defendant Streetline has infringed and continues to infringe at least claim 11 of
`
`the Patent (literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) by intentionally inducing persons to
`
`practice the patented methods of claim 11 through the implementation and use of Streetline
`
`Equipment in combination with one or more of the Streetline Programs. Defendant Streetline is
`
`thus liable for indirect infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`40.
`
`The Kapsch Defendants have directly infringed the at least claim 27 of Patent by
`
`either offering to sell and selling the Streetline system cited above in reference to infringement
`
`by Defendant Streetline, by inducing the direct infringement of the Patent by intentionally
`
`inducing persons to use the patented system, as reflected in Paragraphs 22-25, supra. The
`
`Kapsch Defendants are thus liable for indirect infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 11 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 12 of 26 PageID #: 1420
`
`41.
`
`The Kapsch Defendants have infringed at least claim 11 of the Patent at least by
`
`intentionally inducing persons to practice the patented methods of claim 11, as reflected in
`
`Paragraphs 22-25, supra. The Kapsch Defendants are thus liable for indirect infringement
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`42.
`
`Defendants’ acts of infringement have caused and continue to cause damage to
`
`Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover from Defendants the damages sustained by Plaintiffs
`
`as a result of Defendants’ wrongful acts.
`
`COUNT III
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,233,471
`
`43.
`
`Plaintiffs hereby restates and re-alleges the allegations set forth in the preceding
`
`paragraphs 1-26 and incorporates them by reference.
`
`44.
`
`Plaintiff IP CO is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 8,233,471
`
`entitled “Wireless Network System and Method for Providing Same.” (“the ‘471 Patent”). The
`
`‘471 Patent was duly and legally issued on July 31, 2012. A true and correct copy of the ‘471
`
`Patent is attached as Exhibit 3.
`
`45.
`
`Defendant Streetline has directly infringed and continue to infringe at least claims
`
`2 and 17 of the Patent (literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) by making, having had
`
`made, using, offering for sale and selling, or offering for use and using, the Streetline Equipment.
`
`46.
`
`The correspondence between the limitations of claims 2 and 17 and the Streetline
`
`Equipment are shown in the claim chart attached hereto as Exhibit 13, which is being
`
`contemporaneously filed under seal. The chart is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth
`
`herein, and each limitation is a sub-paragraph hereof.
`
`47.
`
`The Kapsch Defendants have directly infringed at least claims 2 and 17 of the
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 12 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 13 of 26 PageID #: 1421
`
`Patent by either offering to sell and selling the Streetline system cited above in reference to
`
`infringement by Defendant Streetline, or at least by inducing the direct infringement of the
`
`Patent by intentionally inducing persons to use the patented inventions as reflected in Paragraphs
`
`22-25, supra. The Kapsch Defendants are thus liable for indirect infringement pursuant to 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`48.
`
`Defendants’ acts of infringement have caused and continue to cause damage to
`
`Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover from Defendants the damages sustained by Plaintiffs
`
`as a result of Defendants’ wrongful acts.
`
`COUNT IV
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,223,010
`
`49.
`
`Plaintiffs hereby restates and re-alleges the allegations set forth in the preceding
`
`paragraphs 1-26 and incorporates them by reference.
`
`50.
`
`Plaintiff SIPCO is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 8,223,010
`
`entitled “Systems And Methods For Monitoring Vehicle Parking” (“the ‘010 Patent”). The ‘010
`
`Patent was duly and legally issued on July 17, 2012. A true and correct copy of the ‘010 Patent
`
`is attached as Exhibit 4.
`
`51.
`
`Defendant Streetline has directly infringed and continues to infringe at least claim
`
`8 of the Patent (literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) by making, having had made,
`
`using, offering for sale and selling, or offering for use and using, a wireless network system
`
`comprising the Streetline Equipment in combination with one or more of the Streetline
`
`Programs.
`
`52.
`
`The correspondence between the limitations of claim 8 and the Accused
`
`Instrumentality are shown in the claim chart attached hereto as Exhibit 14, which is being
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 13 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 14 of 26 PageID #: 1422
`
`contemporaneously filed under seal. The chart is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth
`
`herein, and each limitation is a sub-paragraph hereof.
`
`53.
`
`The Kapsch Defendants have directly infringed at least claim 1 of the Patent by
`
`either offering to sell and selling the Streetline system cited above in reference to infringement
`
`by Defendant Streetline, or at least by inducing the direct infringement of the Patent by
`
`intentionally inducing persons to use the patented inventions, as reflected in Paragraphs 22-25,
`
`supra. Defendants are thus liable for indirect infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`54.
`
`Defendants’ acts of infringement have caused and continue to cause damage to
`
`Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover from Defendants the damages sustained by Plaintiffs
`
`as a result of Defendants’ wrongful acts.
`
`COUNT V
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,697,492
`
`55.
`
`Plaintiffs hereby restates and re-alleges the allegations set forth in the preceding
`
`paragraphs 1-26 and incorporates them by reference.
`
`56.
`
`Plaintiff SIPCO is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 7,697,492
`
`entitled “Systems And Methods For Monitoring And Controlling Remote Devices” (“the ‘492
`
`Patent”). The ‘492 Patent was duly and legally issued on April 13, 2010. A true and correct
`
`copy of the ‘492 Patent is attached as Exhibit 5.
`
`57.
`
`Defendant Streetline has directly infringed and continues to infringe at least claim
`
`8, 10 and 13 of the Patent (literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) by practicing the
`
`method of communicating command and sensed data between remote wireless devices through
`
`the implementation and use of the Streetline Equipment.
`
`58.
`
`The correspondence between the limitations of claims 8, 10 and 13 and the
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 14 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 15 of 26 PageID #: 1423
`
`Accused Instrumentality are shown in the claim chart attached hereto as Exhibit 15, which is
`
`being contemporaneously filed under seal. The chart is incorporated by reference as if fully set
`
`forth herein, and each limitation is a sub-paragraph hereof.
`
`59.
`
`The Kapsch Defendants have directly infringed at least claims 8, 10 and 13 of the
`
`Patent at least by inducing the direct infringement by intentionally inducing persons to practice
`
`the patented methods, as reflected in Paragraphs 22-25, supra. The Kapsch Defendants are thus
`
`liable for indirect infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`60.
`
`Defendants’ acts of infringement have caused and continue to cause damage to
`
`Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover from Defendants the damages sustained by Plaintiffs
`
`as a result of Defendants’ wrongful acts.
`
`COUNT VI
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,468,661
`
`61.
`
`Plaintiffs hereby restates and re-alleges the allegations set forth in the preceding
`
`paragraphs 1-26 and incorporates them by reference.
`
`62.
`
`Plaintiff SIPCO is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 7,468,661
`
`entitled “Systems And Methods For Monitoring And Controlling Remote Devices” (“the ‘661
`
`Patent”). The ‘661 Patent was duly and legally issued on December 23, 2008. A true and
`
`correct copy of the ‘661 Patent is attached as Exhibit 6.
`
`63.
`
`Defendant Streetline has directly infringed and continues to infringe at least claim
`
`1 of the Patent (literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) by making, having had made,
`
`using, offering for sale and selling, or offering for use and using, a wireless network system
`
`comprising the Streetline Equipment in combination with one or more of the Streetline
`
`Programs.
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 15 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 16 of 26 PageID #: 1424
`
`64.
`
`The correspondence between the limitations of claim 1 and the Accused
`
`Instrumentality are shown in the claim chart attached hereto as Exhibit 16, which is being
`
`contemporaneously filed under seal. The chart is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth
`
`herein, and each limitation is a sub-paragraph hereof.
`
`65.
`
`The Kapsch Defendants have directly infringed at least claim 1 of the Patent by
`
`either offering to sell and selling the Streetline system cited above in reference to infringement
`
`by Defendant Streetline, or at least by inducing the direct infringement of the Patent by
`
`intentionally inducing persons to use the patented inventions, as reflected in Paragraphs 22-25,
`
`supra. The Kapsch Defendants are thus liable for indirect infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §
`
`271(b).
`
`66.
`
`Defendants’ acts of infringement have caused and continue to cause damage to
`
`Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover from Defendants the damages sustained by Plaintiffs
`
`as a result of Defendants’ wrongful acts.
`
`COUNT VII
`DINFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 7,103,511
`
`67.
`
`Plaintiffs hereby restates and re-alleges the allegations set forth in the preceding
`
`paragraphs 1-26 and incorporates them by reference.
`
`68.
`
`Plaintiff SIPCO is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 7,103,511
`
`entitled “Wireless Communication Networks For Providing Remote Monitoring Of Devices”
`
`(“the ‘511 Patent”). The ‘511 Patent was duly and legally issued on September 5, 2006, and the
`
`Patent was reexamined and a Reexamination Certificate was issued on October 25, 2011. A true
`
`and correct copy of the ‘511 Patent, together with its certificate of reexamination is attached as
`
`Exhibit 7.
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 16 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 17 of 26 PageID #: 1425
`
`69.
`
`Defendant Streetline has directly infringed and continues to infringe at least claim
`
`1 of the Patent (literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) by making, having had made,
`
`using, offering for sale and selling, or offering for use and using, a wireless network system
`
`comprising the Streetline Equipment in combination with one or more of the Streetline
`
`Programs.
`
`70.
`
`The correspondence between the limitations of claim 1 and the Accused
`
`Instrumentality are shown in the claim chart attached hereto as Exhibit 17, which is being
`
`contemporaneously filed under seal. The chart is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth
`
`herein, and each limitation is a sub-paragraph hereof.
`
`71.
`
`The Kapsch Defendants have directly infringed at least claim 1 of the Patent by
`
`either offering to sell and selling the Streetline system cited above in reference to infringement
`
`by Defendant Streetline, or at least infringed by inducing the direct infringement of the Patent by
`
`intentionally inducing persons to use the patented inventions, as reflected in Paragraphs 22-25,
`
`supra. The Kapsch Defendants are thus liable for indirect infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §
`
`271(b).
`
`72.
`
`Defendants’ acts of infringement have caused and continue to cause damage to
`
`Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover from Defendants the damages sustained by Plaintiffs
`
`as a result of Defendants’ wrongful acts.
`
`COUNT VIII
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,914,893
`
`73.
`
`Plaintiffs hereby restates and re-alleges the allegations set forth in the preceding
`
`paragraphs 1-26 and incorporates them by reference.
`
`74.
`
`Plaintiff SIPCO is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 6,914,893
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 17 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 18 of 26 PageID #: 1426
`
`entitled “System and Method for Monitoring and Controlling Remote Devices” (“the ‘893
`
`Patent”). The ‘893 Patent was duly and legally issued on July 5, 2005. A true and correct copy
`
`of the ‘893 Patent, together with its certificate of reexamination is attached as Exhibit 8.
`
`75.
`
`Defendant Streetline has directly infringed and continues to infringe at least claim
`
`1 of the Patent (literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) by making, having had made,
`
`using, offering for sale and selling, or offering for use and using, a wireless network system
`
`comprising the Streetline Equipment in combination with one or more of the Streetline
`
`Programs.
`
`76.
`
`The correspondence between the limitations of claim 1 and the Accused
`
`Instrumentality are shown in the claim chart attached hereto as Exhibit 18, which is being
`
`contemporaneously filed under seal. The chart is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth
`
`herein, and each limitation is a sub-paragraph hereof.
`
`77.
`
`The Kapsch Defendants have directly infringed at least claim 1 of the Patent by
`
`either offering to sell and selling the Streetline system cited above in reference to infringement
`
`by Defendant Streetline, or at least infringed by inducing the direct infringement of the Patent by
`
`intentionally inducing persons to use the patented inventions as reflected in Paragraphs 22-25,
`
`supra. The Kapsch Defendants are thus liable for indirect infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §
`
`271(b).
`
`78.
`
`Defendants’ acts of infringement have caused and continue to cause damage to
`
`Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are entitled to recover from Defendants the damages sustained by Plaintiffs
`
`as a result of Defendants’ wrongful acts.
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 18 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 19 of 26 PageID #: 1427
`
`COUNT IX
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,437,692
`
`79.
`
`Plaintiffs hereby restates and re-alleges the allegations set forth in the preceding
`
`paragraphs 1-26 and incorporates them by reference.
`
`80.
`
`Plaintiff SIPCO is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 6,437,692
`
`entitled “System And Method For Monitoring And Controlling Remote Devices” (“the ‘692
`
`Patent”). The ‘692 Patent was duly and legally issued on August 20, 2002. A true and correct
`
`copy of the ‘692 Patent is attached as Exhibit 9.
`
`81.
`
`Defendant Streetline has directly infringed and continues to infringe at least
`
`claims 1, 3 and 4 of the Patent (literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents) by making,
`
`having had made, using, offering for sale and selling, or offering for use and using, a wireless
`
`network system comprising the Streetline Equipment in combination with one or more of the
`
`Streetline Programs.
`
`82.
`
`The correspondence between the limitations of claims 1, 3 and 4, and the Accused
`
`Instrumentality are shown in the claim chart attached hereto as Exhibit 19, which is being
`
`contemporaneously filed under seal. The chart is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth
`
`herein, and each limitation is a sub-paragraph hereof.
`
`83.
`
`The Kapsch Defendants have directly infringed at least claims 1, 3 and 4 of the
`
`Patent by either offering to sell and selling the Streetline system cited above in reference to
`
`infringement by Defendant Streetline, or at least infringed by inducing the direct infringement of
`
`the Patent by intentionally inducing persons to use the patented inventions as reflected in
`
`Paragraphs 22-25, supra. The Kapsch Defendants are thus liable for indirect infringement
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
`
`Second Amended Complaint For Patent Infringement
`- 19 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00830-RGA Document 25 Filed 06/30/17 Page 20 of 26 PageID #: 1428
`
`84.
`
`Defendants’ ac

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket