throbber
Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 532 Filed 04/04/22 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 37537
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`)
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`)
`
`
`)
`
`
`)
`
`C.A. No. 16-455 (RGA)
`)
`
`
`)
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE, ) REDACTED –
`) PUBLIC VERSION
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC. and
`)
`2K SPORTS, INC.,
`)
`
`)
`
`
`DECLARATION OF LOUIS CAMPBELL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’
`REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS
`
`
`
`I, Louis Campbell, declare
`
`1.
`
`I am Of Counsel with the law firm Winston & Strawn LLP, counsel of record for
`
`Defendants in the above referenced matter.
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff originally asserted fifty-one claims against Defendants: claims 1, 4, 5, 6,
`
`7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,701,344; claims 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, and
`
`13 of U.S. Patent 6,714,966; claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 14, 15, and 16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,732,147;
`
`claims 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,829,634; claims 1, 11, 12, and
`
`13 of U.S. Patent No. 6,910,069; and claims 1, 8, 9, and 16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,920,497.
`
`3.
`
`The Patent Trial and Appeals Board invalidated twenty-three of the claims
`
`originally asserted against Defendants: claims 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 11 of U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,701,344; claims 1, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 11 of U.S. Patent 6,714,966; claims 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 9 of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,829,634; and claims 1 and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 6,920,497.
`
`4.
`
`This Court granted summary judgment of invalidity of five of the claims originally
`
`asserted against Defendants: claims 19 and 22 of U.S. Patent No. 6,829,634 and claims 11, 15, and
`
`Original Filing Date: March 28, 2022
`Redacted Filing Date: April 4, 2022
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 532 Filed 04/04/22 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 37538
`
`16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,732,147. Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc., 324 F. Supp.
`
`3d 470, 478-79, 485-87 (D. Del. 2018).
`
`5.
`
`Four of the claims originally asserted against Defendants would be invalid for the
`
`same reasons that the Court granted summary judgment of invalidity except that Plaintiff was no
`
`longer asserting those claims at the time of the Court’s summary judgment decision: claims 20, 21
`
`and 24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,829,634 and claim 14 of U.S. Patent No. 6,732,147.
`
`6.
`
`Thus, thirty-two (23+5+4) of the fifty-one claims originally asserted against
`
`Defendants were invalid. In other words, approximately 63% of the claims—well over half—of
`
`the originally asserted claims were invalid.
`
`7.
`
`Attached as Exhibit R is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the July 27, 2018,
`
`deposition transcript of Michael Mitzenmacher, which has been designated HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY.
`
`8.
`
`Attached as Exhibit S is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the June 15, 2017,
`
`individual and FRCP 30(b)(6) deposition transcript of Joe Ward, which has been designated
`
`HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY.
`
`9.
`
`Attached as Exhibit T is a true and correct copy of Exhibit 6 to the July 27, 2018,
`
`deposition transcript of Michael Mitzenmacher, which has been designated HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY.
`
`10.
`
`Attached as Exhibit U is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the August 14,
`
`2018, deposition transcript of Nenad Medvidovic, which has been designated HIGHLY
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 532 Filed 04/04/22 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 37539
`
`
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
`
`true and correct. Executed on this 28th day of March 2022, in Redwood City, California.
`
`
`
`/s Louis Campbell
`By:
` Louis Campbell
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 532 Filed 04/04/22 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 37540
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on March 28, 2022, I caused the foregoing to be electronically filed
`
`with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, which will send notification of such filing to all
`
`registered participants.
`
`I further certify that I caused copies of the foregoing document to be served on
`
`March 28, 2022, upon the following in the manner indicated:
`
`Philip A. Rovner, Esquire
`Jonathan A. Choa, Esquire
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`1313 North Market Street
`Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`Paul J. Andre, Esquire
`Lisa Kobialka, Esquire
`James R. Hannah, Esquire
`Hannah Lee, Esquire
`Yuridia Caire, Esquire
`Greg Proctor, Esquire
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`Aaron M. Frankel, Esquire
`Marcus A. Colucci, Esquire
`Cristina Martinez, Esquire
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`/s/ Cameron P. Clark
`_______________________________________
`Cameron P. Clark (#6647)
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket