`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
` C.A. No. 16-455 (RGA)
`
`))))))))
`
`
`)
`
`))
`
`
`)
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC, a Delaware
`Limited Liability Corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC., and 2K
`SPORTS, INC., Delaware Corporations,
`
`Defendants.
`
`PLAINTIFF ACCELERATION BAY LLC’S
`NOTICE OF APPEAL
`
`NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that Plaintiff Acceleration Bay, LLC (“Acceleration
`
`Bay”) appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the March 23,
`
`2020 Final Judgment in the above-captioned case (D.I. 495), and also appeals all prior orders,
`
`judgments and rulings entered in this action leading to, underlying or subsumed within the Final
`
`Judgment, including but not limited to the following orders:
`
` The Order granting Defendant’s Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., Rockstar
`Games, Inc., and 2K Sports, Inc.’s (“Defendants”) motion for Summary Judgment
`(D.I. 493) and its accompanying Memorandum Opinion (D.I. 492),
`
` Order Regarding Preliminary Claims (D.I. 86),
`
` Memorandum Opinion regarding Claim Construction for U.S. Patent Nos. 6,701,344,
`6,714,966, 6,829,634, 6,910,069, 6,732,147, and 6,920,497 (D.I. 244),
`
` Claim Construction Order (D.I. 256),
`
` Memorandum Opinion providing Claim Construction for U.S. Patent Nos. 6,701,344,
`6,714,966, 6,829,634, 6,910,069, and 6,732,147 (D.I. 345),
`
` Memorandum Opinion providing Claim Construction for U.S. Patent Nos. 6,701,344,
`6,714,966, 6,829,634, 6,910,069, 6,732,147, and 6,920,497 (D.I. 346),
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 497 Filed 04/07/20 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 34475
`
` Supplemental Claim Construction Order (D.I. 356),
`
` Memorandum Opinion on Claim Construction (D.I. 370),
`
` Second Supplemental Claim Construction Order (D.I. 379),
`
` Memorandum Order regarding The Motion for Clarification (D.I. 419),
`
` Memorandum Opinion regarding The Motion for Summary Judgment of
`Infringement and Validity and Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Catharine M.
`Lawton; The Motion to Correct Claim 19 of the '634 patent; The Motion for
`Summary Judgment; The Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of Dr. Nenad
`Medvidovic, Dr. Michael Mitzenmacher, Dr. Christine Meyer, Dr. Harry Bims, and
`Dr. Ricardo Valerdi (D.I. 440),
`
` Order on The Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement and Validity and
`Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Catharine M. Lawton; The Motion to Correct
`Claim 19 of the '634 patent; The Motion for Summary Judgment; The Motion to
`Exclude Expert Opinions of Dr. Nenad Medvidovic, Dr. Michael Mitzenmacher, Dr.
`Christine Meyer, Dr. Harry Bims, and Dr. Ricardo Valerdi (D.I. 441),
`
` Order Regarding Damage Issues (D.I. 448),
`
` Order Regarding Case Management (D.I. 455),
`
`Acceleration Bay’s Notice of Appeal covers all oral and written rulings, which include all
`
`related hearing transcripts, and all related oral and written arguments. Further, the impact on
`
`each of the patents-in-suit, namely, U.S. Patent Nos. 6,701,344; 6,714,966; 6,732,147;
`
`6,829,634; 6,910,069; and 6,920,497, by entry of the foregoing Orders is hereby also noticed for
`
`appeal.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 497 Filed 04/07/20 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 34476
`
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`
`By: /s/ Philip A. Rovner
`Philip A. Rovner (#3215)
`Jonathan A. Choa (#5319)
`Hercules Plaza
`P.O. Box 951
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 984-6000
`provner@potteranderson.com
`jchoa@potteranderson.com
`
` Attorneys for Plaintiff
` Acceleration Bay LLC
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Paul J. Andre
`Lisa Kobialka
`Hannah Lee
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`(650) 752-1700
`
`Aaron M. Frankel
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`(212) 715-9100
`
`Dated: April 7, 2020
`6648362
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
