Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 231-1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 18728
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC. and
`2K SPORTS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-454 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-455 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER “A” REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE
`WITH SPECIAL MASTER ORDER NO. 2 AND SANCTIONS
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this ______ day of _______, 2017, that Defendants’ Motion
`
`to Compel is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall:
`
`(1) be precluded from accusing any broadcast channel;
`
`(2) be precluded from accusing any method;
`
`(3) be precluded from arguing that the Accused Products practice the Broadcasting
`
`Limitations as described in elements 1-c, 1-d, 13-e, and 13-f in the ‘344 and ‘966, and claim 22
`
`of the ‘634 patent charts;
`
`(4) be precluded from arguing that the Accused Products practice the Connect or
`
`Disconnect Limitations as described in elements 1-b, 1-e and 1-f of the ‘069 patent chart and
`
`elements 1-b, 1-c, 11-b, and 11-c of the ‘147 patent chart;
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC. and
`2K SPORTS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendants.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-454 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-455 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER “A” REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE
`WITH SPECIAL MASTER ORDER NO. 2 AND SANCTIONS
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this ______ day of _______, 2017, that Defendants’ Motion
`
`to Compel is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall:
`
`(1) be precluded from accusing any broadcast channel;
`
`(2) be precluded from accusing any method;
`
`(3) be precluded from arguing that the Accused Products practice the Broadcasting
`
`Limitations as described in elements 1-c, 1-d, 13-e, and 13-f in the ‘344 and ‘966, and claim 22
`
`of the ‘634 patent charts;
`
`(4) be precluded from arguing that the Accused Products practice the Connect or
`
`Disconnect Limitations as described in elements 1-b, 1-e and 1-f of the ‘069 patent chart and
`
`elements 1-b, 1-c, 11-b, and 11-c of the ‘147 patent chart;
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 231-1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 2 of 10 PageID #: 18729
`
`(5) be precluded from asserting infringement under the doctrine of equivalents;
`
`(6) be precluded from accusing any networks other than those specifically identified in its
`
`responses to interrogatories 7 and 9; and
`
`(7) be precluded from asserting any factual allegations other than those specifically cited
`
`in its responses to interrogatories 7 and 9.
`
`Furthermore, Plaintiff shall pay a monetary sanction of Defendants’ expenses incurred as
`
`a result of Plaintiff’s failure to give discovery and comply with the Special Master’s Order Nos.
`
`2 and 3. Defendants shall submit to the Special Master an accounting of the expenses incurred.
`
`
`
`__________________________________
`Special Master Allen M. Terrell, Jr.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-453 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-454 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-455 (RGA)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC. and
`2K SPORTS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 231-1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 3 of 10 PageID #: 18730
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER “B” REGARDING MOTION TO PRECLUDE, STRIKE AND
`COMPEL AND FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DR. ABARBANEL
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this ______ day of ________, 2017, that that Dr.
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`Abarbanel’s errata to his deposition transcript are stricken, plaintiff is precluded from
`
`relying on Dr. Abarbanel’s testimony, and that Kramer Levin and Kramer Levin and Dr.
`
`Abarbanel are compelled to explain their conduct and produce all communications and
`
`relevant documents.
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 231-1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 4 of 10 PageID #: 18731
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`______________________________________
`Special Master Allen M. Terrell, Jr.
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-453 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-454 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-455 (RGA)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC. and
`2K SPORTS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 231-1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 5 of 10 PageID #: 18732
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER “C” REGARDING
`EXPERT REPORT FRAMEWORK
`
`WHEREAS, the Special Master, having consider Defendants’ Motion for an Order
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`Governing Expert Discovery;
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this _______ day of _______________, 2017, that
`
`Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. Expert discover shall be governed by the following
`
`framework:
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 231-1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 6 of 10 PageID #: 18733
`
`
`
`
`
`1.
`
`Without leave of Court, only the following expert reports shall be permitted:
`
`a. Opening expert reports
`
`b. Rebuttal expert reports
`
`c. Reply expert reports
`
`d. No other expert reports will be permitted without either the consent of all
`
`parties or leave of the Court, and expert reports may not be supplemented
`
`without either the consent of all parties or leave of the Court.
`
`2.
`
`All expert testimony must be supported by an expert report under FRCP 26
`
`(a)(2)(B) (as opposed to FRCP 26 (a)(2)(C)).
`
`3.
`
`The page limits for expert reports shall be as follows:
`
`a. All expert reports shall conform to the font and spacing requirements of LR
`
`5.1.1(a)
`
`b. The sum total of all expert reports for each side in each case shall be 1,500
`
`pages, excluding CVs. This total applies to substantive attachments such as
`
`claim charts, appendices, and lists of supporting materials.
`
`c. If patents or issues are removed from the case, the parties shall promptly meet
`
`and confer to determine whether the page limits should be reduced, and shall
`
`request a call with the undersigned if they are unable to agree on revised page
`
`limits.
`
`4.
`
`Expert reports shall:
`
`a. Have a clear and concise summary of all opinions to be provided at trial and
`
`the basis and reasons for them at the beginning of the report;
`
`b. For each opinion, an expert shall identify the materials the expert relied upon
`
`by specificity (e.g. by Bates number or exhibit number (if a document), or by
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 231-1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 7 of 10 PageID #: 18734
`
`deposition page and line number (if a deposition), or by line number (if source
`
`code).
`
`c. In identifying materials relied upon, an expert shall explain clearly how those
`
`materials provide support for the expert’s opinions.
`
`5.
`
`An expert shall not:
`
`a. Testify on matters not clearly disclosed in the expert’s report;
`
`b. Offer or expand upon opinions or bases for opinions not clearly stated in the
`
`expert report;
`
`c. Use or refer to evidence not disclosed and clearly explained in the expert’s
`
`report.
`
`6.
`
`Expert depositions:
`
`a. In each case, an expert may be deposed for up to 7 hours per report, and an
`
`additional 7 hours for each 200 pages over the first 200 pages (e.g. a 400 page
`
`expert report would allow for up to 14 hours of deposition time).
`
`b. If an expert submits the same report (e.g. invalidity/validity) in more than one
`
`case, the deposition shall be treated as if it was a single report rather than 3
`
`reports. The page limits above shall apply.
`
`
`
`
`
`__________________________________
`Special Master Allen M. Terrell, Jr.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-453 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-454 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-455 (RGA)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC. and
`2K SPORTS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 231-1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 8 of 10 PageID #: 18735
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER “D” REGARDING INTERROGATORIES NOS. 5, 7
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this ______ day of ________, 2017, that Plaintiff is
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`compelled to fully respond to Party-Specific Interrogatory Nos. 5 and 7 and is precluded
`
`from relying on facts not disclosed in its response.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`______________________________________
`Special Master Allen M. Terrell, Jr.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-453 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-454 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-455 (RGA)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC. and
`2K SPORTS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 231-1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 9 of 10 PageID #: 18736
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER “E” REGARDING INTERROGATORY NO. 14
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this ______ day of ________, 2017, that Plaintiff is
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`compelled to fully respond to Common Interrogatory No. 14 and is precluded from relying
`
`on facts not disclosed in its response.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`______________________________________
`Special Master Allen M. Terrell, Jr.
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-453 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-454 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-455 (RGA)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC. and
`2K SPORTS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 231-1 Filed 08/16/17 Page 10 of 10 PageID #: 18737
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER “F” REGARDING INTERROGATORY NOS. 6, 8
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this ______ day of ________, 2017, that Plaintiff is
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`compelled to fully respond to Party Specific Interrogatory Nos. 6 and 8 and is precluded
`
`from relying on facts not disclosed in its response.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`______________________________________
`Special Master Allen M. Terrell, Jr.
`
`
`
`.
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
