`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`Civil Action No. 16-453-RGA
`
`Civil Action No. 16-454-RGA
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC., AND 2K
`SPORTS, INC.
`
`Defendants.
`
`Civil Action No. 16-455-RGA
`
`ORDER
`
`For the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum opinion, IT IS HEREBY
`
`ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement and Validity and
`
`Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony of Catharine M. Lawton (D.I. 439; No. 16-454, D.I. 388;
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 441 Filed 08/29/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 31864
`
`No. 16-455, D.I. 386) and Plaintiffs Motion to Correct Claim 19 of the '634 patent (D.I. 438,
`
`No. 16-454, D.I. 387; No. 16-455, D.I. 385) are DENIED; Activision' s Motion for Summary
`
`Judgment (D.I. 440) is GRANTED, as to the invalidity of all asserted claims of U.S. Patent No.
`
`6,829,634 and claims 11 , 15, and 16 of U.S. Patent No. 6,732,147, and as to non-infringement of
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 6,701 ,344, 6,714,966, and 6,920,497, limited to the accused CoD and Destiny
`
`games, and is otherwise DENIED; and Activision' s Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of Dr.
`
`Nenad Medvidovic, Dr. Michael Mitzenmacher, Dr. Christine Meyer, Dr. Harry Bims, and Dr.
`
`Ricardo Valerdi (D.I. 441) is GRANTED, as to Dr. Meyer' s use of the Uniloc jury verdict to
`
`establish a royalty, and as to Dr. Meyer' s testimony that the Boeing/Sony License does not cover
`
`the accused products, and is otherwise DENIED.
`
`Entered this"}£ day of August, 2018.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
