`
`I i !
`
`!
`
`f
`!
`t
`
`i
`I
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 422 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 31402
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`Civil Action No. 16-453-RGA
`
`Civil Action No. 16-454-RGA
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC., AND 2K
`SPORTS, INC.
`
`Defendants.
`
`Civil Action No. 16-455-RGA
`
`ORDER
`
`At the pretrial conference on April 20, 2018, I indicated that I would direct the parties to
`
`specific summary judgment issues on which I want to hear argument on May 17, 2018.
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 422 Filed 05/14/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 31403
`
`The parties are directed to focus their arguments on the following issues: (1) whether
`
`Kegel and ActiveNet do not invalidate the asserted claims of the '497 patent (D.I. 448 at 14); (2)
`
`whether the asserted claims of the '634 patent are indefinite and therefore invalid (D.I. 474 at
`
`32); (3) whether the "computer readable media" claims are invalid as including non-statutory
`
`subject matter (Id. at 37); (4) whether Activision does not infringe the '344 and '966 patents
`
`because Activision does not make, use, or sell the accused networks (CoD, Destiny) (Id. at 3);
`
`and (5) whether Activision does not infringe the '474 patent because it does not make, use, or
`
`sell the accused hardware component (CoD, Destiny) (Id. at 6).
`
`Entered this Ji_ day of May, 2018.
`
`t ~
`t
`f
`r
`I !
`I
`l
`\ I I
`
`I
`f
`I
`
`I
`
`•
`
`