throbber
Case 1:16-cv-00454-RGA Document 472 Filed 04/20/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 39670
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 16-454 (RGA)
`
`)))
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`DECLARATION OF KATHLEEN B. BARRY
`IN SUPPORT OF ELECTRONIC ART INC.’S OPPOSITION TO
`PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
`MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF CATHERINE M. LAWTON
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Stephen J. Kraftschik (#5623)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`skraftschik@mnat.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`April 13, 2018 - Original Filing Date
`April 20, 2018 - Redacted Filing Date
`
`REDACTED -
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00454-RGA Document 472 Filed 04/20/18 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 39671
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-454 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`DECLARATION OF KATHLEEN B. BARRY
`IN SUPPORT OF ELECTRONIC ART INC.’S OPPOSITION TO
`PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
`MOTION TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF CATHERINE M. LAWTON
`
`I, Kathleen B. Barry, declare:
`
`1.
`
`I am a partner at the law firm of Winston & Strawn LLP and counsel to Electronic
`
`Arts Inc. (“EA”) in the above-captioned matter. I declare that the following statements are true to
`
`the best of my knowledge, information, and belief, and that if called upon to testify, I could and
`
`would testify competently thereto. I make this declaration in support of Electronic Art Inc.’s
`
`opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and motion to exclude expert testimony
`
`of Catherine M. Lawton under FRE 702.
`
`2.
`
`Attached as Exhibit B-2 is a true and correct copy of the declaration of David
`
`O’Neill in support of Defendant Electronic Arts Inc.’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for
`
`Partial Summary Judgment.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit C-15 is a true and correct copy of the expert report of
`
`Catherine M. Lawton.
`
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit C-16 is a true and correct copy of Defendant Electronic Arts
`
`Inc.’s Objections and Responses to Plaintiff Acceleration Bay LLC’s First Set of Party Specific
`
`Interrogatories (Nos. 1-7).
`
`REDACTED -
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00454-RGA Document 472 Filed 04/20/18 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 39672
`
`5.
`
`Attached as Exhibit E-15 is a true and correct copy of the deposition transcript of
`
`Catherine Lawton in Acceleration Bay v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. (16-453-RGA).
`
`6.
`
`Attached as Exhibit E-16 is a true and correct copy of the deposition transcript of
`
`Catherine Lawton in Acceleration Bay v. Electronic Arts Inc. (16-454-RGA).
`
`7.
`
`Attached as Exhibit E-17 is a true and correct copy of the deposition transcript of
`
`John P.J. Kelly, Ph.D.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this
`
`13th day of April, 2018, in Chicago, Illinois.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Kathleen B. Barry
`Kathleen B. Barry
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket