throbber
Case 1:16-cv-00454-RGA Document 424 Filed 03/23/18 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 31513
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-454 (RGA)
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`ELECTRONIC ART’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Electronic Arts Inc.’s moves for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.
`
`The grounds for this motion are set forth in Electronic Art’s accompanying brief. The
`
`precise relief sought is detailed in a proposed order accompanying this motion.
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`
`/s/ Stephen J. Kraftschik
`_______________________________________
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Stephen J. Kraftschik (#5623)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`skraftschik@mnat.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Michael A. Tomasulo
`Gino Cheng
`David K. Lin
`Joe S. Netikosol
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`333 South Grand Avenue, 38th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`(213) 615-1700
`
`David P. Enzminger
`Louis L. Campbell
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`275 Middlefield Road, Suite 205
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`(650) 858-6500
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00454-RGA Document 424 Filed 03/23/18 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 31514
`
`Dan K. Webb
`Kathleen B. Barry
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 West Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601
`(312) 558-5600
`
`Krista M. Enns
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`101 California Street, 35th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`(415) 591-1000
`
`Michael M. Murray
`Anup K. Misra
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`200 Park Avenue,
`New York, NY 10166
`(212) 294-6700
`
`Andrew R. Sommer
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Michael Woods
`Paul N. Harold
`Joseph C. Masullo
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`1700 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20006
`(202) 282-5000
`
`March 23, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00454-RGA Document 424 Filed 03/23/18 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 31515
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-454 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`WHEREAS, the Court, having consider Electronic Arts Inc.’s Motion for Summary
`
`Judgment of Non-Infringement Under § 271(a) ;
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this _______ day of _______________, 2018, that
`
`Electronic Art’s Motion is GRANTED:
`
`1. Electronic Arts does not infringe any asserted claim of the ’344, ’966, ’634, ’147, and
`
`’069 Patents because the accused networks are not configured to be m-regular and non-
`
`complete as required by these patents.
`
`2. Electronic Arts does not infringe the ‘344 Patent, the ‘966 Patent or Claim 22 of the ‘634
`
`Patent because the Accused Games do not meet the broadcast/rebroadcast requirements
`
`of these patents.
`
`3. Electronic Arts does not infringe the ‘344 and ‘966 Patents because Electronic Arts does
`
`not make, use, or sell the “Network” “System” or “Information Delivery Service”
`
`claimed in these patents.
`
`4. Electronic Arts does not infringe claims 9 and 16 of the ’497 Patent because it does not
`
`make, use, sell or offer to sell the hardware component claimed in this patent.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00454-RGA Document 424 Filed 03/23/18 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 31516
`
`
`
`5. Electronic Arts does not infringe the ’069 Patent and Claim 1 of the ‘147 Patent because
`
`the actions alleged to infringe those method claims do not all occur in the United States.
`
`6. Electronic Arts does not infringe the ’069 and ’634 Patents because users do not join the
`
`Accused Games as required by these patents.
`
`7. Electronic Arts does not infringe the ‘147 Patent because users do not leave the Accused
`
`Games as required by this patent.
`
`8. Electronic Arts does not infringe the asserted claims of the ’497 Patent because the
`
`Accused Games do not contact a portal computer in the manner required by this patent.
`
`9. Electronic Arts does not infringe any of the asserted patents under the doctrine of
`
`equivalents.
`
`10. Electronic Arts accused acts outside the United States do not infringe any of the asserted
`
`patents.
`
`11. Electronic Arts did not willfully infringe any of the asserted patents.
`
`__________________________________
`Judge Richard G. Andrews
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00454-RGA Document 424 Filed 03/23/18 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 31517
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on March 23, 2018, I caused the foregoing to be electronically filed
`
`with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, which will send notification of such filing to all
`
`registered participants.
`
`I further certify that I caused copies of the foregoing document to be served on March 23,
`
`2018, upon the following in the manner indicated:
`
`Philip A. Rovner, Esquire
`Jonathan A. Choa, Esquire
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`1313 North Market Street, 6th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`Paul J. Andre, Esquire
`Lisa Kobialka, Esquire
`James R. Hannah, Esquire
`Hannah Lee, Esquire
`Yuridia Caire, Esquire
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`Aaron M. Frankel, Esquire
`Marcus A. Colucci, Esquire
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`/s/ Stephen J. Kraftschik
`Stephen J. Kraftschik (#5623)
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket