throbber
Case 1:16-cv-00454-RGA Document 409 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 31228
`
`1313 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 951
`Wilmington, DE 19899-0951
`302 984 6000
`www.potteranderson.com
`
`Philip A. Rovner
`Partner
`Attorney at Law
`provner@potteranderson.com
`302 984-6140 Direct Phone
`302 658-1192 Firm Fax
`
`February 28, 2018
`
`BY CM/ECF & HAND DELIVERY
`
`The Honorable Richard G. Andrews
`U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
`U.S. Courthouse
`844 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`
`Re:
`
`Acceleration Bay LLC v. Electronic Arts, Inc.,
`D. Del., C.A. No. 16-454-RGA
`
`Dear Judge Andrews:
`
`Acceleration Bay respectfully requests that the Court modify the briefing schedule in the
`Electronic Arts action to move the date for submission of opening summary judgment and
`Daubert briefs to May 31, 2018, about four weeks after the expected conclusion of the Activision
`trial. Currently, opening summary judgment and Daubert briefs are due on March 23, 2018,
`with briefing not scheduled to conclude until April 27, 2018, three days before the start of the
`Activision trial.1
`
`Submitting summary judgment and Daubert briefs in the Electronic Arts case before the
`conclusion of the Activision trial risks wasting the parties’ and the Court’s time and resources.
`Developments in the Activision case are very likely to impact, and may moot, many of the issues
`that the parties will likely address in the Electronic Arts case. The parties submitted over 250
`pages of briefing on summary judgment and Daubert motions in the Activision case, covering a
`wide range of issues including validity, infringement and damages. Many of the issues raised in
`these motions will overlap with the issues that will be briefed in the Electronic Arts case. For
`example, the parties have submitted dozens of pages of briefing seeking to exclude each other’s
`damages experts, and many of these arguments at least partially apply in the Electronic Arts
`case. Thus, the Court’s resolution of the Activision motions may significantly narrow or resolve
`the issues in the Electronic Arts case, reducing the amount of necessary briefing. Submitting
`
`1 Electronic Arts declined to participate in a joint call with chambers to request guidance
`regarding how best to present this request. To the extent the Court prefers more formal briefing
`on this issue, Acceleration Bay is prepared to provide it on an expedited briefing schedule so that
`the Court may consider this issue in advance of the current March 23, 2018 due date for opening
`briefs.
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00454-RGA Document 409 Filed 02/28/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 31229
`The Honorable Richard G. Andrews
`February 28, 2018
`Page 2
`
`summary judgment and Daubert motions in the Electronic Arts case before the Court has
`resolved the Activision motions is not an efficient use of time and resources.
`
`Additionally, given that briefing in the Electronic Arts case is currently scheduled to be
`completed on the last business day before the start of the Activision trial, the Court is unlikely to
`decide those motions prior to the conclusion of the Activision trial. The outcome of the
`Activision trial, and the Court’s rulings during that trial, may further narrow and inform the
`Electronic Arts motions, which is another reason to defer them until June.
`
`During the parties’ meet and confer, Electronic Arts’ only objection was that Electronic
`wanted to make sure that the Court has sufficient time to consider the parties’ motions in
`advance of the Electronic Arts trial. However, the Electronic Arts trial is not set to begin until
`August 27, 2018, well after of the conclusion of briefing proposed by Acceleration Bay. If the
`Court believes that is not sufficient time, then Acceleration Bay requests the Court set a deadline
`for some time after the Activision trial, sufficient for the Court’s calendar. Such an extension
`will allow the parties to present the Court with more focused briefing on any remaining issues
`before the Electronic Arts trial.
`
`Thus, in the interest of judicial economy, Acceleration Bay respectfully requests that the
`Court move the date for opening summary judgment and Daubert briefs in the Electronic Arts
`case to May 31, 2018.
`
`Respectfully,
`
`/s/ Philip A. Rovner
`
`Philip A. Rovner (#3215)
`
`cc: All Counsel of Record
`567665
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket