Case 1:16-cv-00454-RGA Document 388-1 Filed 02/02/18 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 24793
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 16-453 (RGA)
`
`C.A. No. 16-454 (RGA)
`
`C.A. No. 16-455 (RGA)
`
`)))))))))
`
`)))))))))
`
`)))))))))
`
`
`)
`)
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC., and 2K
`SPORTS, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`WHEREAS, the Court, having considered Plaintiff Acceleration Bay LLC’s Motion for
`
`Summary Judgment of Infringement and Validity, its Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of
`
`Catharine M. Lawton (both filed February 2, 2018), and the related briefing and all arguments
`
`thereto;
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this ____ day of ____________, 2018, that:
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00454-RGA Document 388-1 Filed 02/02/18 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 24794
`
`Acceleration Bay LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Infringement is hereby
`
`GRANTED. Final judgment of infringement of United States Patent 6,701,344 is entered in
`
`favor of Acceleration Bay LLC and against Activision Blizzard, Inc.
`
`Acceleration Bay LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment of Validity is hereby
`
`GRANTED. Final judgment of validity of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,701,344, 6,714,966, 6,910,069,
`
`6,732,147, 6,829,634, and 6,920,497 is entered in favor of Acceleration Bay LLC and against
`
`Activision Blizzard, Inc. as follows:1
`
`Asserted
`Patents:
`‘344 &
`‘966
`
`Asserted Claims:
`
`Valid Over:
`
`Claim 12
`
`Alagar2
`
`Alagar and Age of Empires3
`
`Alagar and DirectPlay4
`
`DirectPlay
`
`Shoubridge5
`
`‘344 Claim 13, 14, 15
`
`Alagar and Age of Empires
`
`‘966 Claim 13
`
`Alagar and DirectPlay
`
`‘069
`
`Claims 1 and 11
`
`Obraczka Thesis6, Shoubridge and Denes
`
`1 For purposes of defining the alleged prior art at issue in this proposed order, Acceleration Bay
`uses Defendants’ descriptions of the references. This is not an admission that Defendants have
`established that the references were publicly available by any specific date.
`2 S. Alagar, et al., Reliable Broadcast in Mobile Wireless Networks, Military Communications
`Conference, 1 IEEE MILCOM ’95 CONF. REC., 236-40 (San Diego, Cal., 1995)
`(BENNETT_000591-622).
`3 Age of Empires I video game, developed by Ensemble Studios and published by Microsoft for
`Windows 95 or NT operating systems. (DEFS-I0025545)
`4 Bradly Bargen & Peter Donnelly, Inside DirectX (Microsoft Press 1998) (“Inside DirectX”) &
`CD accompanying Inside DirectX (“Inside DirectX CD”), which includes the SDK for DirectX
`5.2, sample games (e.g., Duel, Space Brouhaha, Chatter), and source code (DEFS-I0025548)
`5 Peter J. Shoubridge & Arek Dadej, “Hybrid Routing in Dynamic Networks”, IEEE
`International Conference on Communications, Montreal, 1997. (BENNETT_000001-05)
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00454-RGA Document 388-1 Filed 02/02/18 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 24795
`
`Asserted
`Patents:
`‘147
`
`Asserted Claims:
`
`Valid Over:
`
`Claims 1, 11, 15 and 16
`
`Shoubridge, Denes7 and Rufino8
`
`‘634
`
`‘497
`
`Claims 19 and 22
`
`Claims 9 and 16
`
`DirectPlay, Shoubridge, Obraczka9 and Obraczka Thesis
`
`Kegel10 and Naugle11
`
`ActiveNet12 and Naugle
`
`Acceleration Bay LLC’s Motion to Exclude the Expert Testimony of Catharine M.
`
`Lawton is hereby GRANTED. Catharine M. Lawton is prohibited from testifying at trial about
`
`her opinion regarding the reasonable royalty owed to Acceleration Bay LLC for Activision
`
`Blizzard, Inc.’s infringement, any purported non-infringing alternatives not addressed by
`
`Activision’s technical experts in their reports, and any secondary considerations of non-
`
`obviousness concerning the asserted patents.
`
`____________________________________
`Honorable Richard G. Andrews
`United States District Court Judge
`
`6 Katia Obraczka, “Massively Replicating Services In Wide Area Internetworks” (Ph.D. Thesis,
`University of Southern California, December 1994) (BENNETT_000048-187)
`7 English Language Translation of: Tamás Dénes, “’Evolution’ by Vertex of Even-order Regular
`Graphs,” MATEMATICKAI LAPOK, 1979, pp.365-377 (BENNETT_000232-40 (original);
`BENNETT_000244-66 (translation))
`8 Jose Rufino: Jose Rufino, et al., “A Study on the Inaccessibility Characteristics of ISO 8802/4
`Token Bus LANs”, IEEE INFOCOM ’92: The Conference on Computer Communications;
`Eleventh Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (1992).
`(BENNETT_000193-209)
`9 Katia Obraczka et al., “A Tool for Massively Replicating Internet Archives: Design,
`Implementation, and Experience”, IEEE Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on
`Distributed Computing Systems, May 1996. (BENNETT_000016-31)
`10 Dan Kegel, “NAT and Peer-to-Peer Networking,” http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~dank/peer-
`nat.html (last updated July 17, 1999) (BENNETT_000226-29)
`11 Matthew Naugle, “Network Protocol Handbook” (Mc-Graw-Hill in 1994)
`(BENNETT_000293-408)
`12 ActiveNet archives DEFS-I0025493 and DEFS-I0028725
`
`3
`
`