throbber
Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 597 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 48691
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-453 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`))))))))))
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PROPOSED VOIR DIRE
`
`Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. I am Judge Andrews. We are going to select a
`jury in a civil case called Acceleration Bay LLC, v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.
`
`I am going to ask you a series of questions to help the Court and the attorneys in the jury
`selection process. Before I ask any questions, I am going to ask the Deputy Clerk to swear the
`jury panel to answer any questions truthfully. (To Deputy: Please swear the panel).
`
`If any of you answer “yes” to any of the questions that I ask, please raise your hand, and,
`when recognized by me, please stand, state your name and your jury number. At the end of the
`questions, the Deputy Clerk will ask some of you to take seats in the jury box, and, after that, the
`lawyers and I may ask those of you who answered “yes” to one or more questions to come up to
`the bench to discuss your answers with the lawyers and me.
`
`The presentation of evidence in this case is expected to take 5 days, but jury deliberations
`could extend your service beyond that. The schedule that I expect to keep over the days of
`evidence presentation will include a morning break of fifteen minutes, a lunch break of an hour,
`and an afternoon break of fifteen minutes. We will start at 9:30 a.m. and finish no later than 5
`p.m. each day.
`
`1. Does the schedule that I have just mentioned present a special problem to any of you?
`
`2. This is a patent infringement lawsuit involving computer game products. The
`Plaintiff is Acceleration Bay. Acceleration Bay owns patents relating to computer
`networking technology. It has sued the defendant, Activision Blizzard Inc., or in
`short, “Activision.” Activision makes and sells video games. Acceleration Bay, the
`Plaintiff, alleges that some of those video games infringe its computer networking
`patents. Activision, the Defendant, denies infringement and also alleges that the
`patents are invalid. The jury in this case will be asked to decide whether certain
`video games infringe the patents, and whether the patents are valid. For those of you
`who end up being on the jury, I will give more detailed instructions on the law later in
`the case.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 597 Filed 10/16/18 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 48692
`
`
`
`3. Have any of you heard or read anything about this case from any source, including
`from another person, a press release or the news media?
`
`4. Acceleration Bay is also involved with ongoing disputes with Electronic Arts. Have
`any of you heard or read anything about the disputes between Acceleration Bay and
`Electronic Arts from any source, including from another person, a press release or the
`news media?
`
`5. Acceleration Bay is also involved with ongoing disputes with Take-Two Interactive
`Software, Inc. and its related companies, including Rockstar Games, Inc. and 2K
`Sports, Inc. Have any of you heard or read anything about the disputes between
`Acceleration Bay and Take-Two related companies from any source, including from
`another person, a press release or the news media?
`
`6. Have any of you heard or read anything about Acceleration Bay from any source,
`including from another person, a press release or the news media?
`
`7. Have any of you or your immediate families ever owned stock in any of these
`companies?
`
`8. Have any of you or your immediate families ever had a business relationship with any
`of these companies?
`
`9. Have any of you ever used any video games provided by Activision? These include
`video gaming products identified under the brand names “Destiny,” “World of
`Warcraft” and “Call of Duty,” among others.
`
`10. Have any of you ever used any video games provided by Electronic Arts? These
`include video gaming products identified under the brand names “FIFA series,”
`“NHL series,” “Plants vs Zombies series,” and “PGA series,” among others.
`
`11. Have any of you ever used any video games provided by Take-Two Interactive
`Software, Inc., Rockstar Games, Inc. or 2K Sports, Inc.? These include video gaming
`products identified under the brand names “Grand Theft Auto series” and “NBA2K
`series,” among others.
`
`12. Have any of you ever used any online multiplayer video games other than those
`provided by Activision, EA, Take-Two, Rockstar Games or 2K Sports?
`
`13. Have any of you or your immediate families ever been employed by any of these
`companies prior to today?
`
`14. Have any of you or your immediate families ever had any experience, good or bad,
`with any of these companies, that might keep you from being a fair and impartial
`juror in this case?
`
`15. Do you possess any opinions about any of these companies that might keep you from
`being a fair and impartial juror in this case?
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 597 Filed 10/16/18 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 48693
`
`
`
`16. The law firms involved in this case are (in alphabetical order):
`
`a. Fox Rothschild.
`
`b. Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP;
`
`c. Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP;
`
`d. Phillips, Goldman, McLaughlin & Hall, P.A.;
`
`e. Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLP;
`
`f. Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP; and
`
`g. Winston & Strawn LLP,
`
`The lawyers who appeared in this case and who may appear at trial are (in
`alphabetical order):
`
`a. Paul Andre;
`
`b. Kathleen B. Barry;
`
`c. Jordan T. Bergsten
`
`d. Jack B. Blumenfeld;
`
`e. Yuridia Caire;
`
`f. Louis L. Campbell;
`
`g. Gino Cheng;
`
`h. Jonathan A. Choa;
`
`i. Thomas M. Dunham;
`
`j. Krista M. Enns;
`
`k. David P. Enzminger;
`
`l. Aaron M. Frankel;
`
`m. Aaron E. Hankel;
`
`n. James R. Hannah;
`
`o. Paul N. Harold;
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 597 Filed 10/16/18 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 48694
`
`
`
`p. Lisa Kobialka;
`
`q. Stephen J. Kraftschik;
`
`r. Michael Lee;
`
`s. David K. Lin;
`
`t. Cristina Martinez;
`
`u. Joseph C. Masullo;
`
`v. McGraw C. Maxwell;
`
`w. Anup K. Misra;
`
`x. Michael M. Murray;
`
`y. Joe S. Netikosol;
`
`z. John C. Phillips, Jr.;
`
`aa. Philip A. Rovner;
`
`bb. Andrew R. Sommer;
`
`cc. Michael A. Tomasulo;
`
`dd. B. Trent Webb;
`
`ee. Dan K. Webb;
`
`ff. Gregory Brian Williams.
`
`Do any of you or your immediate families, such as spouse, child, parent, or sibling,
`know any of the attorneys working at the law firms I have just named, including the
`attorney I identified?
`
`17. Have any of you or your immediate families had any business dealings with, or been
`employed by, any of these attorneys or law firms?
`
`18. The potential witnesses in this case are (in alphabetical order):
`
`a. Robert Abarbanel;
`
`b. Joseph Agiato;
`
`c. Byron Beede;
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 597 Filed 10/16/18 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 48695
`
`
`
`
`
`d. Scott Bennett;
`
`e. Harry Bims;
`
`f. Virgil Bourassa;
`
`g. Steven Caliguri;
`
`h. Eric Cole;
`
`i. Patrick Conlin;
`
`j. Patrick Dawson;
`
`k. John Garland;
`
`l. Michael Goodrich;
`
`m. Mark Gordon;
`
`n. Pat Griffith;
`
`o. Fred Holt;
`
`p. David Karger;
`
`q. Daniel Kegel;
`
`r. John Kelly;
`
`s. John Kirk;
`
`t. Robert Kostich;
`
`u. Catharine Lawton;
`
`v. Michael Macedonia;
`
`w. Kurtis McCathern;
`
`x. Nenad Medvidovic;
`
`y. Christine Meyer;
`
`z. Michael Mitzenmacher;
`
`aa. Natasha Radovsky;
`
`bb. Joseph Rumsey;
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 597 Filed 10/16/18 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 48696
`
`
`
`cc. Saralyn Smith;
`
`dd. Scott Smith;
`
`ee. Mark Terrano;
`
`ff. Ricardo Valerdi;
`
`gg. Joe Ward;
`
`hh. Roger Wolfson; and
`
`ii. John Yaney.
`
`Are you familiar with any of these potential witnesses?
`
`19. Have you or any member of your immediate family ever been employed by the
`United States Patent and Trademark Office?
`
`20. Have you or someone close to you ever applied for or obtained a United States or
`foreign patent? If so, what was the subject matter of the patent?
`
`21. Have you or any member of your immediate family ever been involved in a dispute
`about patent rights, copyrights or trademarks?
`
`22. Do you have any opinions about patents, patent rights, or the United States Patent and
`Trademark Office that might make it difficult for you to be a fair and impartial juror
`in this case?
`
`23. Have you ever worked for a company that owns patents?
`
`24. Have you ever worked for a company that licenses patents?
`
`25. Has your employer ever been involved in a patent infringement lawsuit?
`
`26. Do you have strong feelings for or against compensating a patent holder for the use of
`its patented invention?
`
`27. Does it matter to you whether a patent holder purchased a patent versus developing a
`patent itself?
`
`28. Do you or someone close to you have any education, training, or work experience in
`the following areas?
`
` Engineering
`
` Accounting
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 597 Filed 10/16/18 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 48697
`
`
`
` Statistics or econometrics
`
` Law
`
` Computer Programming
`
`
`
`Information Technology
`
`29. Have you served on a jury in a civil case within the last fifteen years? If so:
`
` Was it a civil or criminal case?
`
` Were you the foreperson?
`
`30. Was there anything about your experience as a juror that would affect your ability to
`serve as a juror in this case?
`
`31. Do you know, or know of, any of the other members of this jury panel? If so, please
`describe how you know that person and how long you have known that person.
`
`32. Have you or someone close to you ever been a party to a lawsuit? If so:
`
` What was your role in the lawsuit?
`
` What was the subject matter of the lawsuit?
`
`33. Was the outcome satisfactory? If you are selected to sit as a juror in this case, are you
`aware of any reason why you would be unable to render a verdict based solely on the
`evidence presented at trial?
`
`34. If you are selected to sit as a juror in this case, are you aware of any reason why you
`would not be able to follow the law as I give it to you?
`
`35. Is there anything, such as poor vision, difficulty hearing, difficulty understanding
`spoken or written English, that would make it difficult for you to serve on this jury?
`
`36. Do you have any experience with making video games?
`
`37. Have you ever been employed to make video games?
`
`38. Do you know, or know of, Judge Andrews of this Court or any of the Court’s staff,
`including the clerk, bailiff, reporter, law clerks, or secretary? If so, please identify
`whom you know, the nature of your relationship, and how long you have known that
`person.
`
`39. This is the last question. Is there anything else, including something you have
`remembered in connection with one of the earlier questions, that you think you would
`like to tell me in connection with your service as a juror in this case?
`7
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 597 Filed 10/16/18 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 48698
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 597 Filed 10/16/18 Page 8 of 8 PagelD #: 48698
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket