Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 527 Filed 04/17/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 43853
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-453 (RGA)
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT’S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
`
`
`
`Pursuant to D. Del. LR 51.1(c), Defendant Activision Blizzard, Inc. submits this
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`
`/s/ Stephen J. Kraftschik
`_______________________________________
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Stephen J. Kraftschik (#5623)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`skraftschik@mnat.com
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`proposed jury verdict form.
`
`
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Michael A. Tomasulo
`Gino Cheng
`David K. Lin
`Joe S. Netikosol
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`333 South Grand Avenue, 38th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`(213) 615-1700
`
`David P. Enzminger
`Louis L. Campbell
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`275 Middlefield Road, Suite 205
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`(650) 858-6500
`
`Dan K. Webb
`Kathleen B. Barry
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 West Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601
`(312) 558-5600
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-453 (RGA)
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`DEFENDANT’S PROPOSED VERDICT FORM
`
`
`
`Pursuant to D. Del. LR 51.1(c), Defendant Activision Blizzard, Inc. submits this
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`
`/s/ Stephen J. Kraftschik
`_______________________________________
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Stephen J. Kraftschik (#5623)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`skraftschik@mnat.com
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`proposed jury verdict form.
`
`
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Michael A. Tomasulo
`Gino Cheng
`David K. Lin
`Joe S. Netikosol
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`333 South Grand Avenue, 38th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`(213) 615-1700
`
`David P. Enzminger
`Louis L. Campbell
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`275 Middlefield Road, Suite 205
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`(650) 858-6500
`
`Dan K. Webb
`Kathleen B. Barry
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 West Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601
`(312) 558-5600
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 527 Filed 04/17/18 Page 2 of 11 PageID #: 43854
`
`Krista M. Enns
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`101 California Street, 35th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`(415) 591-1000
`
`Michael M. Murray
`Anup K. Misra
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`200 Park Avenue,
`New York, NY 10166
`(212) 294-6700
`
`Andrew R. Sommer
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Michael Woods
`Paul N. Harold
`Joseph C. Masullo
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`1700 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20006
`(202) 282-5000
`
`B. Trent Webb
`Aaron E. Hankel
`Jordan T. Bergsten
`Maxwell C. McGraw
`SHOOK HARDY & BACON LLP
`2555 Grand Boulevard
`Kansas City, MO 64108
`(816) 474-6550
`
`April 17, 2018
`11832507
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 527 Filed 04/17/18 Page 3 of 11 PageID #: 43855
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.,
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-453 (RGA)
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`SPECIAL VERDICT FORM
`
`
`In answering these questions, you are to follow all of the instructions I have given
`you in the Court's charge.
`
`
`FINDINGS ON INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS
`
`1. For each of the identified networks, did Acceleration Bay prove by a
`preponderance of the evidence that the Activision Blizzard product directly
`infringed the identified claim?
`
`
`
`Place a “Yes” or ‘No” in each box.
`
`Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare
`
`’344 Patent Game Play Logics Network
`Claim 12
`
`Claim 13
`
`Claim 14
`
`Claim 15
`
`
`’966 Patent
`Claim 12
`Claim 13
`
`’634 Patent
`Claim 19
`Claim 22
`
`Game Play Logics Network
`
`
`
`Game Play Logics Network
`
`
`
`Game Play Logics Network
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`’147 Patent
`Claim 1
`Claim 11
`Claim 15
`Claim 16
`
`
`
`Connectivity Graph Network
`
`
`
`
`
`Connectivity Graph Network
`
`
`
`Connectivity Graph Network
`
`
`
`Connectivity Graph Network
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 527 Filed 04/17/18 Page 4 of 11 PageID #: 43856
`
`Connectivity Graph Network
`
`
`
`Connectivity Graph Network
`
`
`
`
`
`Connectivity Graph Network
`
`
`
`Connectivity Graph Network
`
`
`
`Connectivity Graph Network
`
`
`
`
`
`Connectivity Graph Network
`
`
`
`
`’069 Patent
`Claim 1
`Claim 11
`
`’497 Patent
`Claim 9
`Claim 16
`
`Call of Duty: Black Ops 3
`
`’344 Patent Game Play Logics Network
`Claim 12
`
`Claim 13
`
`Claim 14
`
`Claim 15
`
`
`’966 Patent
`Claim 12
`Claim 13
`
`’634 Patent
`Claim 19
`Claim 22
`
`
`
`’147 Patent
`Claim 1
`Claim 11
`Claim 15
`Claim 16
`
`’069 Patent
`Claim 1
`Claim 11
`
`’497 Patent
`Claim 9
`Claim 16
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Game Play Logics Network
`
`
`
`Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare
`
`
`
`Game Play Logics Network
`
`
`
`Game Play Logics Network
`
`
`
`Game Play Logics Network
`
`
`
`
`
`Game Play Logics Network
`
`
`
`Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 527 Filed 04/17/18 Page 5 of 11 PageID #: 43857
`
`Server-to-Server Communication Network
`
`
`
`
`
`World of Warcraft
`
`’344 Patent
`Claim 12
`Claim 13
`Claim 14
`Claim 15
`
`’966 Patent
`Claim 12
`Claim 13
`
`’634 Patent
`Claim 19
`Claim 22
`
`Server-to-Server Communication Network
`
`
`
`Server-to-Server Communication Network
`
`
`
`Server-to-Server Communication Network
`
`
`
`
`
`’497 Patent
`Claim 9
`Claim 16
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 527 Filed 04/17/18 Page 6 of 11 PageID #: 43858
`
`Destiny
`
`’344 Patent
`Claim 12
`Claim 13
`Claim 14
`Claim 15
`
`’966 Patent
`Claim 12
`Claim 13
`
`’634 Patent
`Claim 19
`Claim 22
`
`Bungie Broadcast Network
`
`
`
`
`
`Bungie Broadcast Network
`
`
`
`Bungie Broadcast Network
`
`
`
`
`
`Activity Broadcast Network
`
`
`
`
`
`Activity Broadcast Network
`
`
`
`Activity Broadcast Network
`
`
`
`Activity Broadcast Network
`
`
`
`
`
`Activity Broadcast Network
`
`
`
`Bungie Broadcast Network
`
`
`
`
`
`Bungie Broadcast Network
`
`
`
`Destiny
`
`
`
`’147 Patent
`Claim 1
`Claim 11
`Claim 15
`Claim 16
`
`’069 Patent
`Claim 1
`Claim 11
`
`’497 Patent
`Claim 9
`Claim 16
`
`2. If you found that the Activision Blizzard infringed one or more claims of the
`Asserted Patents, did Acceleration Bay prove by clear and convincing evidence that
`Activision Blizzard willfully infringed?
`
`_______Yes _______ No
`
`
`
`
`3. If you answered YES to question 2, what claims did Acceleration Bay prove by clear
`and convincing evidence that Activision Blizzard willfully infringed?
`
`_______________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 527 Filed 04/17/18 Page 7 of 11 PageID #: 43859
`
`
`
`FINDINGS ON INVALIDITY DEFENSES
`
`4. For each asserted claim of the Asserted Patents, did Activision Blizzard prove by
`clear and convincing evidence that such claim is invalid for lack of written
`description?
`
`Check "Yes" or "No" for each claim.
`
`
`’344 Patent
`
`’966 Patent
`
`
`
`
`’634 Patent
`
`
`’147 Patent
`
`
`’069 Patent
`
`
`’497 Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim 12
`Claim 13
`Claim 14
`Claim 15
`
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`
`
`Claim 12
`Claim 13
`
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`
`Claim 19
`Claim 22
`
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`
`Claim 1
`Claim 11
`Claim 15
`Claim 16
`
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`
`Claim 1
`Claim 11
`
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`
`Claim 9
`Claim 16
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 527 Filed 04/17/18 Page 8 of 11 PageID #: 43860
`
`5. For each asserted claim of the Asserted Patents, did Activision Blizzard prove by
`clear and convincing evidence that such claim is invalid for lack of enablement?
`
`Check "Yes" or "No" for each claim.
`
`
`’147 Patent
`
`
`
`
`’344 Patent
`
`’966 Patent
`
`
`
`
`’634 Patent
`
`
`’069 Patent
`
`
`’497 Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6. For each asserted claim of the Asserted Patents, did Activision Blizzard prove by
`clear and convincing evidence that such claim is invalid for indefiniteness?
`
`Check "Yes" or "No" for each claim.
`
`Claim 1
`Claim 11
`Claim 15
`Claim 16
`
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`
`Claim 12
`Claim 13
`Claim 14
`Claim 15
`
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`
`
`Claim 12
`Claim 13
`
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`
`Claim 19
`Claim 22
`
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`
`Claim 1
`Claim 11
`
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`
`Claim 9
`Claim 16
`
`_______Yes _______ No
`_______Yes _______ No
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 527 Filed 04/17/18 Page 9 of 11 PageID #: 43861
`
`7. For Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare, if you have answered YES to a claim in
`question 1 and answered NO to that claim in question number 3, write the patent
`number and the claim number on the line below. This line should include the
`claims of all patents for which you have found that Call of Duty: Advanced
`Warfare infringes and that Activision did not prove the claim is invalid.
`
`_______________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`8. For Call of Duty: Blacks Ops 3, if you have answered YES to a claim in question
`1 and answered NO to that claim in question number 3, write the patent number
`and the claim number on the line below. This line should include the claims of
`all patents for which you have found that Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 infringes and
`that Activision did not prove the claim is invalid.
`
`_______________________________________________________________
`
`9. For World Of Warcraft, if you have answered YES to a claim in question 1 and
`answered NO to that claim in question number 3, write the patent number and the
`claim number on the line below. This line should include the claims of all patents
`for which you have found that World Of Warcraft infringes and that Activision
`did not prove the claim is invalid.
`
`_______________________________________________________________
`
`10. For Destiny, if you have answered YES to a claim in question 1 and answered
`NO to that claim in question number 3, write the patent number and the claim
`number on the line below. This line should include the claims of all patents for
`which you have found that Destiny infringes and that Activision did not prove the
`claim is invalid.
`
`_______________________________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 527 Filed 04/17/18 Page 10 of 11 PageID #: 43862
`
`FINDINGS ON DAMAGES (IF APPLICABLE)
`
`
`If you have identified claims as both infringed and no invalid in response to questions 4
`through 7, then answer questions 11 through 13.
`
`
`11. What sum of money, if paid now in cash, do you find from a preponderance of
`the evidence would fairly and reasonably compensate Acceleration Bay for
`Activision’s past infringement? Please fill in the amount for each accused product
`that you find infringing.
`
`Only award damages for those patents in which you find a claim both valid and
`infringed. Do not assess any interest, as the Court will determine interest if it
`deems necessary.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`$ _____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12. State whether you applied a running royalty or a lump sum royalty.
`
`
`Answer "running royalty" or "lump sum."
`
`
` _____________________
`
`13. If you applied a running royalty, state the royalty rate you have found for each of
`the Asserted Patents for which you found a claim to be both valid and infringed?
`
`
`’344 Patent
`
`’966 Patent
`
`
`’634 Patent
`
`
`’147 Patent
`
`
`’069 Patent
`
`
`’497 Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`$ _____________________
`
`
`$ _____________________
`
`$ _____________________
`
`$ _____________________
`
`$ _____________________
`
`$ _____________________
`
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 527 Filed 04/17/18 Page 11 of 11 PageID #: 43863
`
`We, the jurors, by signing below, indicate our unanimous verdict.
`
`
`Foreperson
`
`Juror
`
`Juror
`
`Juror
`
`Juror
`
`Juror
`
`Juror
`
`Juror
`
`
`
`
`Date
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
