throbber
Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 526 Filed 04/17/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 43845
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-453 (RGA)
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`[PROPOSED] VOIR DIRE TO JURY PANEL
`
`Pursuant to D. Del. LR 47.1(a)(2), Defendant Activision Blizzard, Inc. submits the attached
`
`
`
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`
`/s/ Stephen J. Kraftschik
`_______________________________________
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Stephen J. Kraftschik (#5623)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`skraftschik@mnat.com
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`proposed voir dire to the jury panel.
`
`
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Michael A. Tomasulo
`Gino Cheng
`David K. Lin
`Joe S. Netikosol
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`333 South Grand Avenue, 38th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`(213) 615-1700
`
`David P. Enzminger
`Louis L. Campbell
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`275 Middlefield Road, Suite 205
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`(650) 858-6500
`
`Dan K. Webb
`Kathleen B. Barry
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 West Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601
`(312) 558-5600
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 526 Filed 04/17/18 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 43846
`
`Krista M. Enns
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`101 California Street, 35th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`(415) 591-1000
`
`Michael M. Murray
`Anup K. Misra
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`200 Park Avenue,
`New York, NY 10166
`(212) 294-6700
`
`
`Andrew R. Sommer
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Michael Woods
`Paul N. Harold
`Joseph C. Masullo
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`1700 K Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20006
`(202) 282-5000
`
`B. Trent Webb
`Aaron E. Hankel
`Jordan T. Bergsten
`Maxwell C. McGraw
`SHOOK HARDY & BACON LLP
`2555 Grand Boulevard
`Kansas City, MO 64108
`(816) 474-6550
`
`April 17, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 526 Filed 04/17/18 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 43847
`
`
`
`
`
`VOIR DIRE
`
`Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. I am Judge Andrews. We are going to select a jury
`in a civil case called Acceleration Bay, LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.
`
` I
`
` am going to ask you a series of questions to help the Court and the attorneys in the jury
`selection process. Before I ask any questions, I am going to ask the Deputy Clerk to swear the
`jury panel to answer any questions truthfully. (To Deputy, Please swear the panel).
`
`
`If any of you answer “yes” to any of the questions that I ask, please raise your hand, and,
`when recognized by me, please stand, state your name and your jury number. At the end of the
`questions, the Deputy Clerk will ask some of you to take seats in the jury box, and, after that, the
`lawyers and I may ask those of you who answered “yes” to one or more questions to come up to
`the bench to discuss your answers with the lawyers and me.
`
`
`The presentation of evidence in this case is expected to take __days, but jury
`deliberations could extend your service beyond that. The schedule that I expect to keep over the
`days of evidence presentation will include a morning break of fifteen minutes, a lunch break of
`an hour, and an afternoon break of fifteen minutes. We will start at 9:30 a.m. and finish no later
`than 5 p.m. each day.
`
`
`1.
`
`Does the schedule that I have just mentioned present a special problem to any of
`
`you?
`
`
`2.
`(Description of the case). This is a patent lawsuit involving video games. The
`Plaintiff is Acceleration Bay. Acceleration Bay owns patents relating to computer networks. It
`has sued the defendant Activision Blizzard (or “Activision”), which sells video games.
`Acceleration Bay says some of those video games infringe its patents. Activision denies
`infringement and also says that the patents are invalid. The jury in this case will be asked to
`decide whether the video games infringe the patents, and whether the patents are valid. For those
`of you who end up being on the jury, I will give more detailed instructions on the law later in the
`case.
`
`
`Have any of you heard or read anything about this case?
`
`3.
`
`The lawyers and law firms involved in this case are:
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`
`Philip A. Rovner, Esquire
`Jonathan A. Choa, Esquire
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`
`
`Paul J. Andre, Esquire
`Lisa Kobialka, Esquire
`James R. Hannah, Esquire
`Hannah Lee, Esquire
`Yuridia Caire, Esquire
`Greg Proctor, Esquire
`Aaron M. Frankel, Esquire
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 526 Filed 04/17/18 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 43848
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Jack B. Blumenfeld
`Stephen J. Kraftschik
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`
`Marcus A. Colucci, Esquire
`Cristina Martinez, Esquire
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`
`Michael A. Tomasulo
`Gino Cheng
`David K. Lin
`Joe S. Netikosol
`David P. Enzminger
`Louis L. Campbell
`Dan K. Webb
`Kathleen B. Barry
`Krista M. Enns
`Michael M. Murray
`Anup K. Misra
`Andrew R. Sommer
`Thomas M. Dunham
`Michael Woods
`Paul N. Harold
`Joseph C. Masullo
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`
`Trent Webb
`Aaron Hankel
`Jordan T. Bergsten
`SHOOK, HARDY & BACON LLP
`
`
`Do any of you know any of the attorneys or law firms I have just named?
`
`
`
`
`
`4.
`Have you or any member of your immediate family (such as a spouse, child,
`parent or sibling) had any business dealings with, or been employed by, any of these attorneys or
`law firms?
`
`
`5.
`Have any of you or any member of your immediate families ever been employed
`by Acceleration Bay or Activision Blizzard?
`
`
`6.
`Have any of you or any member of your immediate families ever owned stock in
`either of these companies?
`
`
`7.
`Have any of you or any member of your immediate families ever had a business
`relationship with either of these companies?
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 526 Filed 04/17/18 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 43849
`
`
`
`8.
`Have any of you or any member of your immediate families ever had any
`experience, good or bad, with either of these companies that might keep you from being a fair
`and impartial juror in this case?
`
`
`9.
`Have you ever purchased or used any Activision video games, such as Call of
`Duty, World of Warcraft, or Destiny?
`
`
`10. Do you have any opinions about Acceleration Bay or Activision that might keep
`you from being a fair and impartial juror in this case?
`
`
`11. Have you or any member of your immediate family been employed by, had any
`business relationship with, or owned stock of The Boeing Company?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`12. Do you have any strong opinions about The Boeing Company?
`
`13.
`
`The potential witnesses in this case are:
`
`Plaintiff’s Witnesses
`
`Dr. Harry Bims
`Dr. Eric Cole
`Patrick Conlin
`John Garland
`Dr. Michael Goodrich
`Dr. Nenad Medvidovic
`Dr. Christine Meyer
`Dr. Michael Mitzenmacher
`Dr. Ricardo Valerdi
`Joe Ward
`Virgil Bourassa
`Fred Holt
`Byron Beede
`Patrick Dawson
`Mark Gordon
`Pat Griffith
`John Kirk
`Robert Kostich
`Kurtis McCathern
`Joseph Rumsey
`Saralyn Smith
`Glen Van Datta
`Roger Wolfson
`John Yaney
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 526 Filed 04/17/18 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 43850
`
`
`
`Defendant’s Witnesses
`
`John P. J. Kelly, Ph.D.
`Michael R. Macedonia, Ph.D.
`David R. Karger, Ph.D.
`Catherine M. Lawton
`Scott Bennett, Ph.D.
`Fred B. Holt
`Virgil E. Bourassa
`Scott Smith
`Robert Abarbanel
`Albert Erismann
`Dan Kegel
`Saralyn Smith
`Pat Griffith
`Patrick Dawson
`Rob Kostich
`Byron Beede
`Roger D. Wolfson
`Mark Terrano
`John Kirk
`John Yaney1
`Kurtis McCathern
`Steve Caliguri
`Joseph Daniele
`Natasha Radovsky
`Joe Ward
`John Garland
`Mark Gordon
`Joe Rumsey
`Joseph Agiato
`Glenn Van Datta
`
`Are you familiar with any of these potential witnesses?
`
`
`
`14. Have you or any member of your immediate family ever been employed by the
`United States Patent and Trademark Office?
`
`
`15. Have you or any member of your immediate family, or your employer, ever
`applied for, or obtained, a United States or foreign patent?
`
`16. Have you or any member of your immediate family, or your employer, ever been
`involved in a dispute about patent rights?
`
`
`17. Do you believe that when the government awards a patent, it believes the patent
`must have great value?
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 526 Filed 04/17/18 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 43851
`
`
`
`
`
`18. Do you have any opinions about patents, patent rights, or the United States Patent
`and Trademark Office that might make it difficult for you to be a fair and impartial juror in this
`case?
`
`
`19. Have you ever invented anything?
`
`
`20. Have you ever had an idea or invention that was taken or used by someone else
`without your permission?
`
`21. Have you ever felt that someone took credit for your work?
`
`
`
`22. Have you, or any member of your immediate family ever owned a small
`business?
`
`23. Have you or any member of your immediate family ever lost out on a business
`deal or opportunity due to what you believe to be unfair acts of a competitor or other person?
`
`24. Have you or any member of your immediate family ever had a business venture
`that failed?
`
`25. Do you think large companies often take advantage of smaller companies?
`
`
`
`26. Have you served on a jury in a civil case within the last fifteen years?
`
`
`27. Have you or a close friend or family member been a plaintiff or defendant in a
`lawsuit?
`
`28. Have you considered filing a lawsuit because you had been wronged or harmed
`in some way?
`
`
`29. Do you believe if a case gets to trial it must have substantial merit?
`
`30. Do you have any experience with the design, manufacture or sale of video
`games?
`
`
`31. Have you ever played video games?
`
`32. Have you ever played video games on line?
`
`33. Do you have any strong positive or negative feelings about video game
`companies?
`
`34. Do you believe video games are harmful to young people who play them?
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 526 Filed 04/17/18 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 43852
`
`
`
`35. Have you ever worked with computer networks or the Internet, or computer code
`or programming?
`
`
`36. Do you have any specialized training relating to computer networks or the
`Internet, or computer code or programming?
`
`
`
`37. Do you have any specialized training in economics or accounting?
`
`
`38. Do you serve in a leadership position on a board or an organization, such as a
`school board or charitable organization?
`
`39. Do you frequently post comments on line, including on Facebook, Twitter or a
`
`blog?
`
`
`40.
`If you are selected to sit as a juror in this case, are you aware of any reason why
`you would be unable to render a verdict based solely on the evidence presented at trial?
`
`
`41.
`If you are selected to sit as a juror in this case, are you aware of any reason why
`you would not be able to follow the law as I give it to you?
`
`
`42.
`Is there anything, such as poor vision, difficulty hearing, difficulty understanding
`spoken or written English, that would make it difficult for you to serve on this jury?
`
`
`43.
`This is the last question. Is there anything else, including something you have
`remembered in connection with one of the earlier questions, that you would like to tell me in
`connection with your service as a juror in this case?
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket