Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 1 of 44 PageID #: 39102
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`C.A. No. 16-453 (RGA)
`REDACTED
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`DECLARATION OF DR. MICHAEL R. MACEDONIA IN SUPPORT OF
`DEFENDANT ACTIVISION BLIZZARD INC.’S
`MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF
`NON-INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NOS. 6,732,147 AND 6,910,069
`
`Original Filing Date: February 2, 2018
`Redacted Filing Date: February 13, 2018
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 2 of 44 PageID #: 39103
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`I.
`
`1.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`My name is Dr. Michael R. Macedonia, and I have been retained by counsel for
`
`Activision Blizzard, Inc. (“Activision”) to provide assistance in the above captioned matter,
`
`which I understand to be related to the alleged infringement of certain claims in U.S. Patent Nos.
`
`6,732,147 (the “’147 patent”) and 6,910,069 (the “’069 patent”), collectively “the Acceleration
`
`Patents” or “Asserted Patents.” I understand that the Plaintiff Acceleration Bay LLC
`
`(“Acceleration”) has asserted that the following claims are allegedly infringed: Claims 1, 11, 15
`
`and 16 of the ’147 patent and claims 1 and 11 of the ’069 patent (“Asserted Claims”).
`
`2.
`
`I have been asked to provide this declaration in support of Activision’s motion for
`
`summary judgment. My opinions in this declaration reflect the opinions in my expert report on
`
`noninfringement of November 13, 2017, and my supplemental expert report on noninfringement
`
`of February 2, 2018.
`
`3.
`
`In this declaration, I set forth certain opinions regarding non-infringement of the
`
`Acceleration Patents by the following accused products: Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare and
`
`Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 (collectively, “CoD”) and Xbox One and Xbox 360 versions of
`
`Destiny (collectively, “Destiny”) (collectively, “Accused Products”). This declaration contains a
`
`statement of certain of my opinions formed in this case and provides the bases and reasons for
`
`those opinions. I make the following statements based on my own personal knowledge and, if
`
`called as a witness, I could and would testify to the following.
`
`4.
`
`My C.V., including my publications and articles, is attached as Appendix A. If asked, I
`
`will testify regarding my qualifications, background, and experience in the field of the design,
`
`development, and implementation of networked games.
`
`5.
`
`I am the Assistant Vice President for Research and Innovation at the University of
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 3 of 44 PageID #: 39104
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`Central Florida, Deputy Director for the UCF Applied Research Institute, and Co-PI of the
`
`Defense Department-sponsored Intelligence Community Center for Academic Excellence (“IC
`
`CAE”). Prior to joining UCF, I was a Vice President and Technical Fellow at SAIC, and a
`
`General Manager for a virtual world game software startup, Forterra. Previously, I was a
`
`member of the federal Senior Executive Service and Director of the Disruptive Technology
`
`Office (now “IARPA”) for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence in Washington,
`
`DC.
`
`IARPA is the U.S. intelligence community’s centrally funded research activity for
`
`advanced technology. I am also the former Chief Technology Officer for the United States
`
`Army Program Executive Office for Simulation, Training and Instrumentation (“PEO
`
`STRI”). PEO STRI develops and provides products and services for training, instrumentation,
`
`targets, and threat simulations for a wide variety of customers including the United States Army,
`
`United States Marine Corps, United States Special Operations Command, the United States
`
`Department of Defense (“DoD”) testing community, and over fifty international customers. I
`
`was responsible for the technology acquisition strategy of simulation systems for the United
`
`States Army.
`
`6.
`
`While at PEO STRI, I led the Army’s effort to develop the Institute for Creative
`
`Technologies, initiated the Full Spectrum Warrior X-Box project, and established the Massive
`
`Multiplayer Game project. I served as the lead for the Graphics Processing Unit (“GPU”)
`
`initiative for simulation under the Defense Advanced Research Products Agency (“DARPA”)
`
`Polymorphous Computing Architecture (“PCA”) program and co-sponsored the Association of
`
`Computing Machinery (“ACM”) Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics (“SIGGRAPH”)
`
`GPU (geometry processing unit) Workshop with NVidia and ATI.
`
`7.
`
`I also served as an infantry officer in a variety of command and staff positions in the
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 4 of 44 PageID #: 39105
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`United States and overseas assignments including Germany and the Middle East. I also served
`
`as a project manager for computer and electronic warfare systems.
`
`8.
`
`I am a member of IEEE Computer Society and the ACM. I am a former contributing
`
`editor and on the editorial board of IEEE Computer and the former Entertainment Computing
`
`editor for IEEE Computer. I also was a contributing editor to IEEE Computer Graphics and
`
`Applications and the Army Principal to the Interservice/Industry Simulation, Training, and
`
`Education Conference. I am a member of the Army Science Board.
`
`9.
`
`I have a Bachelor of Science degree with a concentration in Electrical Engineering and
`
`Political Science from West Point, and a Master of Science in Telecommunications from the
`
`University of Pittsburgh. I have a Ph.D. in Computer Science from the Naval Postgraduate
`
`School. My dissertation, “A Network Software Architecture for Large Scale Virtual
`
`Environments,” is widely referenced in the network game community.
`
`A.
`
`PRIOR TESTIMONY
`
`10.
`
`A list of cases in which I have testified at deposition or trial or in written reports during at
`
`least the past four years is attached as Appendix B of this report.
`
`B.
`
`COMPENSATION
`
`11. My rate of compensation for my work in this case is
`
`per hour plus any direct
`
`expenses incurred. I have no financial interest in the outcome of the litigation between
`
`Activision and Acceleration.
`
`C. MATERIALS CONSIDERED
`
`12.
`
`In order to perform the analysis and evaluation necessary for the reports from which this
`
`declaration is derived, I reviewed and relied on a variety of sources and documents, including
`
`those expressly cited in this report. Attached as Appendix C which is a listing of the information
`
`I have considered in forming my opinions. I have also reviewed all documents cited in relation
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 5 of 44 PageID #: 39106
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`to the patents discussed herein in the Infringement Reports of Drs. Medvidovic and
`
`Mitzenmacher. I have also played the accused games.
`
`D.
`
`PERSON OF ORDINARY SKILL IN THE ART
`
`13.
`
`I have been asked to opine on the knowledge and understanding of a person of ordinary
`
`skill in the art (“POSITA”) as of the time of invention of the Asserted Patents. Each of the
`
`Asserted Patents was filed on July 31, 2000, and I understand that Plaintiff contends that the
`
`inventors have testified that they conceived of the subject matter of the Asserted Patents by
`
`November 1996. My opinion as to who a POSITA is does not change if the time of invention
`
`falls within the range of November 1996 to July 2000.
`
`14.
`
`I understand that the factors considered in determining the ordinary level of skill in the
`
`art include: (i) the levels of education and experience of persons working in the field; (ii) the
`
`types of problems encountered in the field; and (iii) the sophistication of the technology. I
`
`understand that a POSITA is not a specific real individual, but rather a hypothetical individual
`
`having the qualities reflected by the factors above.
`
`15.
`
`In my opinion, the field of art relevant to the asserted patents is a combination of
`
`computer networking and graph theory, which are related disciplines.
`
`16.
`
`In my opinion, a POSITA at the time of the claimed inventions would have a minimum
`
`of: (i) a bachelor’s degree in computer science, computer engineering, applied mathematics, or a
`
`related field of study; and (ii) four or more years of industry experience relating to networking
`
`protocols or network topologies. Additional graduate experience could substitute for professional
`
`experience, or significant experience in the field could substitute for formal education.
`
`17.
`
`Drs. Medvidovic and Mitzenmacher and I disagree about the appropriate level of skill in
`
`the art. See Ex. A-1, Opening Expert Report of Dr. Medvidovic (excerpts), at ¶43; Ex. A-2
`
`Opening Expert Report of Dr. Mitzenmacher (excerpts), at ¶38. In my opinion, the differences
`
`- 4 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 6 of 44 PageID #: 39107
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`between our definitions have no impact on my analysis, and my opinions and conclusions are the
`
`same whether Dr. Medvidovic’s, Dr. Mitzenmacher’s, or my definition applies.
`
`18. My opinions are based on my educational and academic background, my commercial
`
`experience in the field of art, the technical training required to reduce to practice the system
`
`described in the asserted patents, the relevant prior art, my reading of the asserted patents and
`
`technical literature, and my experience consulting in many cases involving related technology.
`
`19.
`
`As of November 1996, I would have met or exceeded the level of skill required by the
`
`above definition, and I am in a position to opine on the understanding of a POSITA as of that
`
`date. Unless otherwise noted, my statements and opinions below about the knowledge or
`
`understanding of a POSITA should be understood to refer to the knowledge or understanding of
`
`a POSITA as of the time of invention.
`
`II.
`
`THE ACCUSED PRODUCTS
`
`A.
`
`CALL OF DUTY
`
`20.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`B.
`
`DESTINY
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 7 of 44 PageID #: 39108
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`23.
`Oo
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`III.
`—II.
`
`THE ACCUSED PRODUCTS DO NOT MEET THE LIMITATIONS OF THE ’147 AND ’069
`THE ACCUSED PRODUCTS DO NOT MEET THE LIMITATIONS OF THE ’147 AND ’069
`PATENTS FOR “M-REGULAR” OR “BROADCAST CHANNEL.”
`PATENTS FOR “M-REGULAR’”’ OR “BROADCAST CHANNEL.”
`
`A.
`A.
`
`THE ACCUSED CALL OF DUTY (“COD”) NETWORKS ARE NOT “M-REGULAR”
`THE ACCUSED CALL OF DuTy (“COD”) NETWORKS ARE NOT “M-REGULAR”
`
`24.
`I)SS
`
`1
`1
`- 6 -
`ON
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 8 of 44 PageID #: 39109
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`
`
`
`
`25.
`
`
`
`- 7 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 9 of 44 PageID #: 39110
`
`CONFIDENTIAL - OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`26.
`nN
`
`.
`
`27.
`
`NNN‘oOoo—
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`B.
`w
`
`DESTINY IS NOT “M-REGULAR”
`DESTINYIs NoT “M-REGULAR”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`!
`!
`- 8 -
`co
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 10 of 44 PageID #: 39111
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`
`
`
`
`30.
`
`31.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 During prosecution, the applicants distinguished the ’344 patent over Alagar stating that Alagar
`only coincidentally showed an m-regular graph network.
`
`
`
`- 9 -
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 11 of 44 PageID #: 39112
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`34.
`
`
`
`- 10 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 12 of 44 PageID #: 39113
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`35.
`
`36.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 11 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 13 of 44 PageID #: 39114
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`
`
`37.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`- 12 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 14 of 44 PageID #: 39115
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`38.
`
`39.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 13 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 15 of 44 PageID #: 39116
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`40.
`
`41.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 14 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 16 of 44 PageID #: 39117
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`42.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IV.
`
`THE ACCUSED PRODUCTS DO NOT INFRINGE THE ‘069 PATENT CONCERNING A METHOD
`FOR JOINING AN M-REGULAR NETWORK.
`
`A.
`
`CALL OF DUTY
`
`1.
`
`CoD does not “identify[] a pair of participants of the network that are
`connected” or “disconnect[] the participants of the identified pair
`from each other.”
`
`43.
`
`44.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 15 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 17 of 44 PageID #: 39118
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2.
`
`There is no “edge connection request” sent to “randomly selected
`neighboring participants” in CoD.
`
`45.
`
`46.
`
`
`
`- 16 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 18 of 44 PageID #: 39119
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`B.
`
`DESTINY
`
`1.
`
`Destiny does not use a step of “identifying a pair of participants of the
`network that are connected” or “disconnecting the participants of the
`identified pair from each other.”
`
`47.
`
`48.
`
`
`
`
`
`- 17 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 19 of 44 PageID #: 39120
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`2.
`
`There is no “edge connection request” sent to “randomly selected
`neighboring participants” in Destiny.
`
`49.
`
`50.
`
`51.
`
`52.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 18 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 20 of 44 PageID #: 39121
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`V.
`
`THE ACCUSED PRODUCTS DO NOT INFRINGE THE ‘147 PATENT CONCERNING A METHOD
`FOR DISCONNECTING FROM A BROADCAST CHANNEL.
`
`A.
`
`CALL OF DUTY
`
`1.
`
`Call of Duty Does not Send a “Connection Port Search Message” as
`Required by the ’147 Patent
`
`53.
`
`54.
`
`55.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 19 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 21 of 44 PageID #: 39122
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`56.
`
`57.
`
`58.
`
`
`
`2.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Call of Duty Does not Send a “Disconnect Message” with a “List of
`Neighbors” as Required by the ’147 Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 20 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 22 of 44 PageID #: 39123
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`B.
`
`DESTINY
`
`1.
`
`Destiny Does not Send a “Connection Port Search Message” as
`Required by the ’147 Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 21 -
`
`59.
`
`60.
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 23 of 44 PageID #: 39124
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`
`
`2.
`
`
`
`61.
`
`62.
`
`63.
`
`64.
`
`
`
`
`
`Destiny Does not Send a “Disconnect Message” with a “List of
`Neighbors” as Required by the ’147 Patent
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 22 -
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 24 of 44 PageID #: 39125
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODE
`
`
`
`65.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`66.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 23 -
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 25 of 44 PageID #: 39126
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 25 of 44 PagelD #: 39126
`
`CONFIDENTIAL=OUTSIDE COUNSEL ONLY
`
`RESTRICTED HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL ACTIVISION AND NON-PARTY SOURCE CODI
`
`| declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoingis
`
`true and correct.
`
`Executed on this 2nd day of February, 2018, in Orlando,#lorida.
`
`if
`
`Dr. Michael R. Macedonia
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 26 of 44 PageID #: 39127
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 26 of 44 PagelD #: 39127
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX A
`APPENDIX A
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 27 of 44 PageID #: 39128
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 28 of 44 PageID #: 39129
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 29 of 44 PageID #: 39130
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 29 of 44 PagelD #: 39130
`
`APPENDIX B
`APPENDIX B
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 30 of 44 PageID #: 39131
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 30 of 44 PagelD #: 39131
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 31 of 44 PageID #: 39132
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 31 of 44 PagelD #: 39132
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX C
`APPENDIX C
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 32 of 44 PageID #: 39133
`
`Appendix C – Materials Considered (Macedonia)
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 33 of 44 PageID #: 39134
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 33 of 44 PagelD #: 39134
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 34 of 44 PageID #: 39135
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 34 of 44 PagelD #: 39135
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 35 of 44 PageID #: 39136
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 35 of 44 PagelD #: 39136
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 36 of 44 PageID #: 39137
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 36 of 44 PagelD #: 39137
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 37 of 44 PageID #: 39138
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 37 of 44 PagelD #: 39138
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 38 of 44 PageID #: 39139
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 38 of 44 PagelD #: 39139
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 39 of 44 PageID #: 39140
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 39 of 44 PagelD #: 39140
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 40 of 44 PageID #: 39141
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 40 of 44 PagelD #: 39141
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 41 of 44 PageID #: 39142
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 41 of 44 PagelD #: 39142
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 42 of 44 PageID #: 39143
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 42 of 44 PagelD #: 39143
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 43 of 44 PageID #: 39144
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 43 of 44 PagelD #: 39144
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 471 Filed 02/13/18 Page 44 of 44 PageID #: 39145
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on February 13, 2018, I caused the foregoing to
`
`be electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, which will send
`
`notification of such filing to all registered participants.
`
`I further certify that I caused copies of the foregoing document to be served
`
`on February 13, 2018, upon the following in the manner indicated:
`
`Philip A. Rovner, Esquire
`Jonathan A. Choa, Esquire
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`1313 North Market Street, 6th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`Paul J. Andre, Esquire
`Lisa Kobialka, Esquire
`James R. Hannah, Esquire
`Hannah Lee, Esquire
`Yuridia Caire, Esquire
`Greg Proctor, Esquire
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`Aaron M. Frankel, Esquire
`Marcus A. Colucci, Esquire
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`
`/s/ Stephen J. Kraftschik
`________________________________
`Stephen J. Kraftschik (#5623)
`
`