throbber
Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 267 Filed 08/23/17 Page 1 of 2 PagelD #: 23972
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 267 Filed 08/23/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 23972
`
`Fox Rothschild ue
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`Citizens Bank Center
`919 North Market Street, Suite 300
`P.O. Box 2323
`Wilmington, DE 19899-2323
`T: 302.654.7444 F: 302.656.8920
`www.foxrothschild.com
`
`GREGORYB, WILLIAMS
`Direct No: 302.622.4211
`Email: GWilliams@FoxRothschild.com
`
`August 23, 2017
`
`VIA CM/ECF
`
`Special Master Allen M. Terrell, Jr.
`United States District Court for the District of Delaware
`844 North King Street, Unit 26, Room 6124
`Wilmington, Delaware 19801
`
`Re:
`
`Acceleration Bay LLC v.Activision Blizzard,Ine.et al.
`U.S.D.C., D.Del., Civil Action Nos. 16-453, 16-454, and 16-455-RGA
`
`Dear Special Master Terrell:
`
`I write on behalf of myself and co-counsel, Tara Elliott of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale
`& Door, seeking permission to intervene on behalfof our client Sony Interactive Entertainment
`(“Sony”) in the pending matters of Acceleration Bay v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al., Civil
`Action Nos. 16-453, 16-454, and 16-455 (RGA).
`
`Weunderstand that Plaintiff Acceleration Bay has sought in discovery highly
`confidential and sensitive information belonging to Sony from the defendants in these related
`actions. Wefurther understand that Acceleration Bay filed a motion to compel, challenging the
`defendants’ objections to the requests for production, and that briefing is underway. Sony seeks
`an opportunity to be heard in these proceedings with the permission ofthe Special Master, in
`whatever form and procedural mechanismis preferred.
`
`Weunderstand that a schedule has been set and respectfully request the Special Master to
`revisit and extend the schedule to permit Sony an opportunity to briefits positions and be heard
`in argument. We have reached out to counsel for Acceleration Bay and counsel for Defendants
`to confer and inquire whether Acceleration Bay or Defendants have any objection to Sony’s
`request to intervene and extension ofthe schedule. Defendants have advised that they no
`objection to Sony’s requestto intervene and extension of the schedule. Our understandingis that
`Acceleration Bay is considering Sony’s request.
`
`A Pennsylvania Limited Liability Partnership
`
`California
`
`Colorado
`
`Connecticut
`
`Delaware
`
`District of Columbia
`
`Florida
`
`Illinois
`
`Minnesota
`
`Nevada
`
`NewJersey
`
`NewYork
`
`Pennsylvania
`
`Texas
`
`Washington
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 267 Filed 08/23/17 Page 2 of 2 PagelD #: 23973
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 267 Filed 08/23/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 23973
`
`Pay Fox Rothschild ue
`
`ATTORNEYS AT LAW
`
`Special Master Allen M. Terrell, Jr.
`August 23, 2017
`Page 2
`
`While we wait to hear back from Acceleration Bay on whetherit has any objection to
`Sony’s request, we wanted to promptly bring this matter to your attention given the current
`schedule. We look forward to hearing from you on whether Sony needsto file a formal motion
`to intervenein this action if Acceleration Bay has an objection or whether this letter will suffice.
`Wealso look forward to hearing from you on scheduling. We can make ourselves available for a
`teleconference at your convenience.
`
`Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter.
`
`Respectfully,
`
`/s/ Gregory B. Williams (#4195)
`
`Gregory B. Williams
`
`GW:bjr
`oe
`Tara D. Elliott, Esquire (via Email)
`All Counsel of Record (via CM/ECF)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket