Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 210 Filed 07/05/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 21942
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-453 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-454 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-455 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC. and
`2K SPORTS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`DEFENDANTS’ JULY 5, 2017 MOTIONS TO COMPEL (A), (D) – (H)
`
`Activision Blizzard, Inc. (“Activision”), Electronic Arts Inc. (“EA”) and Take-Two
`
`Interactive Software, Inc., Rockstar Games, Inc., and 2K Sports, Inc. (“Take-Two”) (collectively,
`
`“Defendants”) move to compel on the issues set forth in the following table:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-453 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-454 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 16-455 (RGA)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC. and
`2K SPORTS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`DEFENDANTS’ JULY 5, 2017 MOTIONS TO COMPEL (A), (D) – (H)
`
`Activision Blizzard, Inc. (“Activision”), Electronic Arts Inc. (“EA”) and Take-Two
`
`Interactive Software, Inc., Rockstar Games, Inc., and 2K Sports, Inc. (“Take-Two”) (collectively,
`
`“Defendants”) move to compel on the issues set forth in the following table:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 210 Filed 07/05/17 Page 2 of 6 PageID #: 21943
`
`Brief Motion Title
`A. Motion to Compel
`Compliance With
`Special Master Order
`No. 2 And Sanctions
`
`B.
`C.
`D. Motion to Preclude
`regarding Party
`Specific Interrogatory
`No. 1
`E. Motion to Preclude
`regarding Party
`Specific Interrogatory
`No. 2
`F. Motion to Compel
`Documents
`Responsive to
`Defendants’ RFP nos.
`139, 145, 150, 163,
`165, 167, and 174
`
`G. Defendants’ motion
`for an unredacted
`copy of all agreements
`between Plaintiff and
`Hamilton Capital.
`
`Relief Sought
`Order under Rule 37 sanctioning
`Plaintiff for failing to comply with
`previous orders by precluding Plaintiff
`from supporting certain claims and
`from introducing certain matters into
`evidence, and by ordering Plaintiff to
`pay Activision’s expenses, and
`ordering Plaintiff to comply with
`previous orders.
`Intentionally Omitted
`Intentionally Omitted
`Order precluding Plaintiff from
`providing additional evidence other
`than the information already disclosed
`in response to Interrogatory No. 1.
`Order precluding Plaintiff from
`arguing a different date for the
`hypothetical negotiation (date of first
`infringement).
`Order compelling Plaintiff to produce
`documents in response to RFP Nos.
`139 (communications to third parties),
`145 (NDAs to Data Connections, IBM,
`Dassault), 150 (Source of funds), 163
`(Articles of incorporation, operating
`agreement, and minutes), 165 (Source
`of revenue/loans), 167 (Payments to
`Boeing), and 174 (Compensation to
`employees).
`Order compelling Plaintiff to produce
`an unredacted copy of all agreements
`between Plaintiff and Hamilton Capital
`
`Moving Party
`Activision
`
`All Defendants
`
`All Defendants
`
`All Defendants
`
`All Defendants
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 210 Filed 07/05/17 Page 3 of 6 PageID #: 21944
`
`Brief Motion Title
`H. Defendants’ motion
`for a protective order
`against further
`technical fact witness
`depositions including
`those noticed to date.
`
`Relief Sought
`Order holding that Plaintiff is not
`entitled to take the depositions of Mark
`Gordon and Kurtis McCathern for
`Activision, Martin Clourarte and
`Dylan Loney for EA, and Evan Harsha
`for Take Two until Plaintiff has
`provided a complete response to
`Interrogatory Nos. 7 and 9
`
`Moving Party
`All Defendants
`
`The grounds for these motions are set forth in the Opening Letter Briefs A, and D-H
`
`submitted to the Special Master herewith.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 210 Filed 07/05/17 Page 4 of 6 PageID #: 21945
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`
`/s/ Stephen J. Kraftschik
`__________________________________
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Stephen J. Kraftschik (#5623)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblumenfeld@mnat.com
`skraftschik@mnat.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Michael A. Tomasulo
`Gino Cheng
`David K. Lin
`Joe S. Netikosol
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`333 South Grand Avenue, 38th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`(213) 615-1700
`
`David P. Enzminger
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`275 Middlefield Road, Suite 205
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`(650) 858-6500
`
`Dan K. Webb
`Kathleen B. Barry
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 West Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601
`(312) 558-5600
`
`Krista M. Enns
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`101 California Street, 35th Floor
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`(415) 591-1000
`
`Michael M. Murray
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`200 Park Avenue,
`New York, NY 10166
`(212) 294-6700
`
`July 5, 2017
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 210 Filed 07/05/17 Page 5 of 6 PageID #: 21946
`
`
`
`7.1.1 CERTIFICATION
`
`I hereby certify that the subject of the foregoing motion has been discussed with
`
`counsel for the plaintiff and that we have not been able to reach agreement.
`
`/s/ Stephen J. Kraftschik
`
`Stephen J. Kraftschik (#5623)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00453-RGA Document 210 Filed 07/05/17 Page 6 of 6 PageID #: 21947
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on July 5, 2017, I caused the foregoing to be electronically
`
`
`
`filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF, which will send notification of such filing to all
`
`registered participants.
`
`
`
`
`
`I further certify that I caused copies of the foregoing document to be served on
`
`July 5, 2017, upon the following in the manner indicated:
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
`
`/s/ Stephen J. Kraftschik
`
`Stephen J. Kraftschik (#5623)
`
`
`
`Philip A. Rovner, Esquire
`Jonathan A. Choa, Esquire
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`1313 North Market Street, 6th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`Paul J. Andre, Esquire
`Lisa Kobialka, Esquire
`James R. Hannah, Esquire
`Hannah Lee, Esquire
`Yuridia Caire, Esquire
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`Aaron M. Frankel, Esquire
`Marcus A. Colucci, Esquire
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
