`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`C.A. No. 16-453 (RGA)
`
`C.A. No. 16-454 (RGA)
`
`C.A. No. 16-455 (RGA)
`
`)))))))))
`
`))))))))) )))))))))))
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC. and
`2K SPORTS, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`WHEREAS, the Court having considered Plaintiff Acceleration Bay LLC’s
`
`(“Acceleration Bay”) Motion for Leave to Amend its Preliminary Election of Asserted Claims
`
`and Defendants’ Opposition to the Motion;
`
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
`
`(1) Acceleration Bay’s Motion is DENIED;
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00455-RGA Document 117-2 Filed 05/05/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 12626
`
`(2) The following claims found unpatentable in IPR proceedings are withdrawn as
`
`asserted claims: claims 1, 6, 7, 8, 10, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,701,344 (the “’344 Patent”);
`
`claims 1, 7 and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 6,714,966 (the “’966 Patent”); and, claims 1, 4, 5 and 6 of
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,829,634 (the “’634 Patent”), and the only other asserted claims are those listed
`
`in Acceleration Bay’s March 25, 2016 Preliminary Elections of Asserted Claims; and
`
`(3) Claim 12 of the ‘344 Patent and claim 10 of the ‘634 patent are not asserted
`
`claims.
`
`SO ORDERED this ___day of _____________, 2017.
`
`The Honorable Richard G. Andrews
`
`2
`
`