Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 55-2 Filed 02/15/18 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1578
`Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 55-2 Filed 02/15/18 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1578
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 55-2 Filed 02/15/18 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 1579
`
`Will Ellerman
`
`From:
`Sent:
`To:
`Cc:
`
`Subject:
`
`Dear Counsel
`
`Carlson, Erik <ecarlson@wsgr.com>
`Friday, February 2, 2018 7:41 PM
`Ari Rafilson
`Michael Shore; Alfonso G Chan; Joseph DePumpo; Russell DePalma; Christopher Evans;
`Andrew M. Howard;Will Ellerman; Hiromasa Ohashi;Jeff Horn; Cody Kachel;Yuri
`Sakaguchi; Yurie Asako; Stamatios Stamoulis; Richard WeinblatU Rhonda Polvado; Bindu
`Palapura; David Ellis Moore; Stephanie O'Byrne;James Yoon;Jose Villarreal; Henry Pan;
`Edward Poplawsi; OVT lPBridge
`RE: 1:16-cv-00290-JFB-SRF - Godo Kaisha lP Bridge 1 v. OmniVision Technologies, lnc.
`
`We've received lP Bridge's disclosures of its proposed expert Albert Theuwissen in the Del, -290 case and the N.D. Cal. -
`778 case. We are still reviewing those disclosures and have yet to obtain client approval but have identified some issues
`we raise now in the hopes of resolving the issues as soon as possible.
`
`First, given Dr. Theuwissen's foreign domicile, OmniVision objects to Dr. Theuwissen's disclosure as an expert to the
`extent the expert intends to review any confidential materials produced by OmniVision outside the United States. This
`objection extends to both the physical removal of confidential material outside the United States, and to online review
`of confidential information from a location outside the United States. Such activities would run afoulof the Export
`Control provisions of Paragraph 13.3 of the Stipulated Protective Order. Moreover, this exposes OmniVision's
`confidential information for access outside the jurisdiction of the Court. Such risk could be highly prejudicialto
`OmniVision.
`
`Second, please identify which party in the /V v. Conon case retained Dr. Theuwissen. This information is required by
`Paragraph 7.a(aX5)of the Stipulated Protective Order. ln the future, please be sure to provide this information in the
`first instance.
`
`We look forward to your response
`
`Regards,
`Erik
`
`\XfrR Erik J. Carlson ' Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
`
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550 . Los Angeles, CA 90071 . 323.210.2940 . ecarlson@wsgr.com
`
`From : Ari Rafilson Ima ilto : arafilson @ShoreCha n.com]
`Sent: Friday, February 02, 20IB 9:00 AM
`To: Poplawski, Edward; Carlson, Erik; Bindu Palapura; David Ellis Moore; Stephanie O'Byrne; Yoon, James; Villarreal,
`Jose; Pan, Henry; WSGR - OWIP Bridge
`Cc: Michael Shore; Alfonso G Chan; Joseph DePumpo; Russell DePalma; Christopher Evans; Andrew M, Howard; Will
`Ellerman; Hiromasa Ohashi; Jeff Horn; Cody Kachel; Yuri Sakaguchi; Yurie Asako; Stamatios Stamoulis; Richard
`Weinblatt; Rhonda Polvado
`Subject: RE: 1:16-cv-00290-JFB-SRF - Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1v. OmniVision Technologies, Inc,
`
`Counsel, ln addition to the disclosures made in the attached letter, please be advised that Dr. Theuwissen is currently
`serving as a consultant to Alston & Bird on behalf of Complainants, Honeywell lnternational, lnc., Hand Held Products,
`lnc., and Metrologic lnstruments, lnc, in Certain Bar Code Readers, Scan Engines, Products Containing the Same, and
`ComponentsThereof,lTC lnvestigation No.377-f A-1061. He has not provided experttestimony in thatcase,
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 55-2 Filed 02/15/18 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 1580
`
`Best Regards,
`
`Srlnne CHffq
`De,Punlx.F$ r*r*
`
`Ari Rafilson
`Bank of America Plaza
`901 Main Street, Suite 3300
`Dallas, Texas 75202
`214-593-9 1.1-4 ( Di rect)
`2L4-593-91I0 (Firm)
`2I4-593-9tI1 (Fax)
`
`From: Rhonda Polvado
`Sent: Tuesday, January 30,20L8 4:59 PM
`To: Edward Poplawsi <epoplawski@wsgr,c >; Erik Carlson <e-c-arlson@wsgr.com>; Bindu Palapura
`<bpolapura@potterandel_s_o_n.com>; David Ellis Moore <d.m.oore@pottqran.delson.com>; Stephanie O'Byrne
`<sgbyrne@.po.Iler:an-derson.com>; James Yoon <ivoon@w-sgr.co.m>; Jose Villarreal<ivillaLreal@wsgr.c.qln>; Henry Pan
`<hpan@_w.sgr..co.m>; OVT lPBridge <OVT [PBridge@wser.com>
`Cc: Michael Shore <m-s.ho_fe.@ShoreChan.com>; Alfonso G Chan <achan@ShoreChan.com>; Joseph DePumpo
`<idepU.mpo@_S.ho*reChan.com.>; Ari Rafilson <arafilsq_UQ_5ho_rqQh-an=c_o_m>; Russell DePalma
`<rdep-alnla@ShoreChan,.qem>; Christopher Evans <cevans@_ShorgC_harl.com>; Andrew M. Howard
`<a.h.o!nrafd@ShoreC_h.an.go*nn>; Will Ellerman <wellerman@SlloreC_han.com>; Hiromasa Ohashi
`<qh.a.shi@9_hashiandh_orn.cofn>; Jeff Horn <hqrn@ohashiandhorn-com>; Cody Kachel<qka-qh.gl@ohashia.ndh_o_r.n.com>;
`Yuri Sakaguchi <vsakaguchi@p.h.aShiAndh.p_fn.pon>; Yurie Asako <vasako@ohashi_a_ndh_o_rn.q.gm.>; Stamatios Stamoulis
`<st?".r-noulis@swdelaw,.cgm.>; Richard Weinblatt <w_ei.nblatt@swdelaw.corI>
`Subject: L:16-cv-00290-JFB-SRF - Godo Kaisha lP Bridge 1 v. OmniVision Technologies, lnc.
`
`Counsel,
`
`Please see the attached correspondence
`
`$r{*Rn{}{AN
`*gPuptP* r-r-r'
`
`Rlionda K. Polvado
`Senior Litigation/IP Paralegal
`Barrk of AniericaPlaza
`901 Main Street, Suite 3300
`Dallas, Texas 75202
`214-593-9134 (Direct)
`214-593-9110 (Firm)
`214-593-9111 (Fax)
`
`Dogs are not our whole life, but they make our lives whole.
`- Roger Caras
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 55-2 Filed 02/15/18 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 1581
`NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
`Theinformationcontainedinandtransmittedwiththise-mail maybesubjecttotheAttorney-ClientandAttorneyWork Productprivileges,andis
`Confidential, lt is intended onlyforthe individuals or entities designated as recipients above. You are hereby notified that any dissemination,
`distribution, copying, use or reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail by orto anyone otherthan the addressee
`designatedabovebythesenderisunauthorizedandstrictlyprohibited. lfyouhavereceivedthise-mail inerror,pleasenotifythesenderbyreply
`immediately. Any e-mail erroneously transmitted to you should be immediately destroyed.
`
`This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and privileged material for the sole use of the
`intended recipient. Any review, copying, or distribution of this email (or any attachments thereto) by others is strictly
`prohibited. lf you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and permanently delete the
`original and any copies of this email and any attachments thereto.
`
`3
`
`