throbber
Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 20 Filed 07/07/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 766
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`GODO KAISHA IP BRIDGE 1,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`









`
`CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-cv-00290-SLR
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
`
`WHEREAS on May 16, 2016, Defendant OmniVision Technologies, Inc. (“OmniVision”
`
`or “Defendant”) filed a Motion to Transfer Venue to the Northern District of California [D.I. 10-
`
`13] (“Motion to Transfer”);
`
`WHEREAS OmniVision and Plaintiff Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1’s (“IP Bridge” or
`
`“Plaintiff”) (collectively “the parties”) have agreed by stipulation to conduct early discovery
`
`relating only to venue and OmniVision’s Motion to Transfer [D.I. 16];
`
`WHEREAS the Court granted the parties’ stipulation on May 27, 2016 [No docket
`
`number];
`
`WHEREAS the parties filed a proposed scheduling order on June 10, 2016 [D.I. 18];
`
`WHEREAS the Court approved the parties’ proposed scheduling order on June 13, 2016
`
`[No docket number];
`
`WHEREAS IP Bridge served its venue discovery requests on OmniVision on June 15,
`
`2016;
`
`2016;
`
`WHEREAS OmniVision responded to IP Bridge’s venue discovery requests on June 30,
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 20 Filed 07/07/16 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 767
`
`WHEREAS IP Bridge’s Opposition to the Motion to Transfer or to file a motion to
`
`compel relating to the venue discovery is currently due on July 15, 2016;
`
`WHEREAS the parties agree to stipulate to an extension of time for IP Bridge to file its
`
`Opposition to OmniVision’s Motion to Transfer or a motion to compel relating to the venue
`
`discovery up through and including August 10, 2016;
`
`WHEREAS OmniVision reserves the right to seek venue discovery upon receipt of IP
`
`Bridge’s Opposition to OmniVision’s Motion to Transfer and to seek an extension of time to file
`
`its reply until twenty-one (21) days after IP Bridge responds to OmniVision’s venue discovery
`
`requests;
`
`WHEREAS the parties further agree that OmniVision’s reply on the Motion to Transfer
`
`will be due within twenty-one (21) days of IP Bridge’s Opposition, if OmniVision does not serve
`
`venue discovery requests on IP Bridge.
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff and Defendant in the above-
`
`referenced actions, through their undersigned counsel and subject to the approval of the Court,
`
`that:
`
`1.
`
`IP Bridge’s deadline to file its Opposition to OmniVision’s Motion to Transfer or
`
`to file a motion to compel relating to the venue discovery is extended up through
`
`and including August 10, 2016; and
`
`2.
`
`OmniVision shall have the right to seek venue discovery upon receipt of IP
`
`Bridge’s Opposition to OmniVision’s Motion to Transfer and to seek an extension
`
`of time to file its reply until twenty-one (21) days after IP Bridge responds to
`
`OmniVision’s venue discovery requests;
`
`3.
`
`OmniVision’s reply on the Motion to Transfer is due within twenty-one (21) days
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 20 Filed 07/07/16 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 768
`
`of IP Bridge’s Opposition, if OmniVision does not serve venue discovery requests
`
`on IP Bridge.
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 20 Filed 07/07/16 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 769
`
`
`
`STAMOULIS & WEINBLATT LLC
`
`
`By: /s/ Stamatios Stamoulis
`
`Stamatios Stamoulis (#4606)
`
`Richard C. Weinblatt (#5080)
`
`Two Fox Point Centre
`
`6 Denny Road, Suite 307
`
`Wilmington, DE 19809
`
`(302) 999-1540
`
`Stamoulis@swdelaw.com
`
`Weinblatt@swdelaw.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Godo Kaisha
`IP Bridge 1
`
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`SHORE CHAN DEPUMPO LLP
`Michael W. Shore (pro hac vice)
`shore@shorechan.com
`Alfonso Garcia Chan (pro hac vice)
`achan@shorechan.com
`Joseph F. DePumpo (pro hac vice)
`jdepumpo@shorechan.com
`Jennifer M. Rynell (pro hac vice)
`jrynell@shorechan.com
`Russell J. DePalma (pro hac vice)
`rdepalma@shorechan.com
`Ari Rafilson (pro hac vice)
`arafilson@shorechan.com
`901 Main Street, Suite 3300
`Dallas, Texas 75202
`Telephone: (214) 593-9110
`Facsimile: (214) 593-9111
`
`OHASHI & HORN LLP
`Hiromasa Ohashi (pro hac vice)
`ohashi@ohashiandhorn.com
`Jeff J. Horn Jr. (pro hac vice)
`horn@ohashiandhorn.com
`Cody A. Kachel (pro hac vice)
`ckachel@ohashiandhorn.com
`1120 Avenue of the Americas, 4th Floor
`New York, New York 10036
`Telephone: (214) 743-4170
`Facsimile: (214) 743-4179
`
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`
`By: /s/ Bindu Palapura__________
`
`David E. Moore (#3983)
`Bindu A. Palapura (#5370)
`Stephanie O’Byrne (#4446)
`Hercules Plaza
`P.O. Box 951
`
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`
`(302) 984-6000
`
`dmoore@potteranderson.com
`
` bpalapura@potteranderson.com
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant OmniVision
`Technologies, Inc.
`
`
`
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`
`Edward G. Poplawski (pro hac vice)
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Tel: (323) 210-2901
`epoplawski@wsgr.com
`
`James C. Yoon (pro hac vice)
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Tel: (650) 493-9300
`jyoon@wsgr.com
`
`Jennifer J. Schmidt (pro hac vice)
`Madeleine E. Greene (pro hac vice)
`One Market Street
`Spear Tower, Suite 3300
`San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
`Tel: (415) 947-2000
`jschmidt@wsgr.com
`mgreene@wsgr.com
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 20 Filed 07/07/16 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 770
`
`
`
`SO ORDERED, this __________ day of _________________________, 2016.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_______________________________
`United States District Judge
`
`STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
`
`
`
`5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket