throbber
Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 131 Filed 11/28/18 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 3148
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`GODO KAISHA IP BRIDGE 1,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`OMNIVISION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 1:16-cv-00290-MN
`
`DECLARATION OF DIYANG LIU IN SUPPORT OF OMNIVISION’S
`DISCOVERY LETTER IN ADVANCE OF THE
`DECEMBER 3, 2018 TELEPHONIC HEARING
`
`David E. Moore (#3983)
`Bindu A. Palapura (#5370)
`Stephanie E. O’Byrne (#4446)
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`Hercules Plaza, 6th Floor
`1313 N. Market Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Tel: (302) 984-6000
`dmoore@potteranderson.com
`bpalapura@potteranderson.com
`sobyrne@potteranderson.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant OmniVision
`Technologies, Inc.
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`James C. Yoon
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`Professional Corporation
`650 Page Mill Road
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
`Tel: (650) 493-9300
`
`Edward G. Poplawski
`Erik J. Carlson
`Lisa D. Zang
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`633 West Fifth Street, Suite 1550
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Tel: (323) 210-2901
`
`Jose C. Villarreal
`Henry Pan
`Diyang Liu
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`900 S. Capital of Texas Highway
`Las Cimas IV, 5th Floor
`Austin, TX 78746
`Tel: (512) 338-5400
`
`Dated: November 28, 2018
`6013804 / 43303
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 131 Filed 11/28/18 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 3149
`
`I, Diyang Liu, declare as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am an attorney at Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, counsel for Defendant
`
`OmniVision Technologies, Inc. (“OmniVision”) in the above-referenced action. I submit this
`
`declaration in support of OmniVision’s Letter Brief in Advance of the December 3, 2018
`
`Telephonic Hearing. The matters set forth herein are based upon my personal knowledge, and, if
`
`called as a witness, I could and would competently testify thereto.
`
`2.
`
`Attached as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Exhibit 5 to Plaintiff Godo
`
`Kaisha IP Bridge 1’s (“Godo”) Amended Infringement Contentions for United States Patent
`
`6,794,677, OV5650 (OmniBSI), served on November 16, 2018.
`
`3.
`
`Attached as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of Godo’s Third Supplemental
`
`Objections and Responses to OmniVision’s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-16), served
`
`November 16, 2018.
`
`4.
`
`Attached as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of excerpts of the transcript of
`
`the November 12, 2018 deposition of Huawei Device USA, including pages 1–5 and 105.
`
`5.
`
`Attached as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of Godo’s Objections and
`
`Responses to OmniVision’s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-16), served February 26, 2018.
`
`Here, on pages 38 and 39, Godo initially identified twelve Japanese-language documents with
`
`Bates
`
`ranges
`
`290-IPB-OVT004967-004968,
`
`290-IPB-OVT005413-005414,
`
`290-IPB-
`
`OVT007874-007904, 290-IPB-OVT007919-008068.
`
`6.
`
`Attached as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of Godo’s Second
`
`Amended/Supplemental Objections and Responses to OmniVision’s First Set of Interrogatories
`
`(Nos. 1-16), dated May 4, 2018. Here, at page 40, Godo has amended its previous responses to
`
`Interrogatory No. 15, including by removing the citation to twelve previously-relied-upon
`
`LIU DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF
`OMNIVISION’S DISCOVERY LETTER
`CASE NO. 1:16-cv-00290-MN
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 131 Filed 11/28/18 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 3150
`
`documents and adding a citation to a different document, 290-IPB-OVT012949-012995. Godo
`
`further states that ‘IP Bridge does not maintain records related to the Asserted Patents by
`
`“apparatus, product, device, process, method, act, or other instrumentality that practices at least
`
`one asserted claim of any of the Asserted Patents” or “gross revenue…on a quarterly basis.’”
`
`7.
`
`Attached as Exhibit R is a true and correct copy of Exhibit 5 to Godo’s Initial
`
`Infringement Contentions for United States Patent 6,794,677, OV5650 (OmniBSI), served on
`
`January 22, 2018.
`
`8.
`
`Attached as Exhibit S is a true and correct copy of a Friday, November 2, 2018
`
`email from Godo’s Counsel (Chijioke Offor) to OmniVision’s Counsel, including me by virtue
`
`of my inclusion in the “WSGR – OVT/IP Bridge” email list. The email is the first notice from
`
`Godo of a Huawei deposition, and the first notice that it was scheduled for the following
`
`Tuesday, November 6, 2018.
`
`9.
`
`Attached as Exhibit T is a true and correct copy of email correspondence,
`
`including a November 5, 2018 email between Godo’s Counsel (Chijioke Offor) and
`
`OmniVision’s Counsel (Lisa Zang) that was forwarded to me by Ms. Zang by virtue of my
`
`inclusion in the “WSGR – OVT/IP Bridge” email list. The email relates to the rescheduling of
`
`the Huawei deposition.
`
`10.
`
`Attached as Exhibit U is a true and correct copy of an email chain between
`
`OmniVision’s Counsel (including Lisa Zang) and Godo’s Counsel (including Sam Joyner) that I
`
`received by virtue of my inclusion in the “WSGR – OVT/IP Bridge” email list. The emails
`
`related to OmniVision’s objection to the Huawei deposition, dated between November 6-8, 2018.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
`
`foregoing is true and correct.
`
`LIU DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF
`OMNIVISION’S DISCOVERY LETTER
`CASE NO. 1:16-cv-00290-MN
`
`-2-
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 131 Filed 11/28/18 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 3151
`
`Executed at Austin, Texas on November 28, 2018.
`
`/s/ Diyang Liu
`Diyang Liu
`
`LIU DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF
`OMNIVISION’S DISCOVERY LETTER
`CASE NO. 1:16-cv-00290-MN
`
`-3-
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket