throbber
Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 118 Filed 10/30/18 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 2960
`1313 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 951
`Wilmington, DE 19899-0951
`302 984 6000
`www.potteranderson.com
`
`David E. Moore
`Partner
`Attorney at Law
`dmoore@potteranderson.com
`302 984-6147 Direct Phone
`302 658-1192 Fax
`
`October 30, 2018
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
`The Honorable Maryellen Noreika
`U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
`J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
`844 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`
`Re: Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 V. OmniVision Technologies, Inc.
`C.A. No. 16-290-MN
`
`Dear Judge Noreika:
`
`Counsel for OmniVision were surprised to receive Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike this
`morning, less than 24 hours prior to the Markman Hearing in this matter. In addition to its
`opposition on the merits and to certain factual representations in the motion, OmniVision
`disputes the procedural propriety of the motion. First, the motion and supporting papers
`contravene Your Honor’s directive regarding motions to strike, specifically that “any motion to
`strike any pleading or other document shall be made pursuant to the discovery dispute procedure
`set forth in Paragraph 8(a)” of Your Honor’s form patent scheduling order. Second, with regards
`to the timing of the motion and the meet and confer process, Plaintiff first mentioned its
`objection to the use of Dr. Yang’s declaration as evidence during a call on October 18,
`2018. When pressed for the bases of its objection, Plaintiff offered none. On the same day,
`OmniVision followed-up with the email (Ex. 1 hereto) requesting again that Plaintiff state the
`bases and support for its objection. Again, Plaintiff remained silent – at least for the 12 days that
`followed. What is clear is that the parties have yet to complete the required meet and confer
`discussion regarding Plaintiff’s motion.
`
`Given the foregoing procedural improprieties, as well as the tactical timing of the motion,
`OmniVision respectfully requests that Plaintiff be ordered to withdraw the motion.
`Alternatively, and to the extent the Court directs OmniVision to respond to the motion and brief
`as filed, counsel respectfully requests a response time in accordance with Local Rules, so that
`what little time is left before tomorrow’s proceedings may be devoted to preparation.
`
`Respectfully,
`
`/s/ David E. Moore
`
`David E. Moore
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00290-MN Document 118 Filed 10/30/18 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 2961
`The Honorable Maryellen Noreika
`October 30, 2018
`Page 2
`
`DEM:nmt/5986419/ 43303
`
`Enclosure
`cc:
`Clerk of the Court (via hand delivery)
`Counsel of Record (via electronic mail)
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket