throbber
Case 1:16-cv-00250-RGA Document 1 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`FRESENIUS KABI USA, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`B. BRAUN MEDICAL INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`Civil Action No. _________
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC (“Fresenius”) brings this action for patent infringement
`
`against Defendant B. Braun Medical Inc. (B. Braun”).
`
`1.
`
`This is an action by Fresenius against B. Braun for infringement of United States
`
`Patent No. 8,476,010 (“the ʼ010 patent”). This action arises out of B. Braun’s filing of an
`
`Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) seeking approval by the United States Food and
`
`Drug Administration (“FDA”) to sell generic versions of Diprivan®, an innovative intravenously
`
`administered sedative and anesthetic, prior to the expiration of the ʼ010 patent.
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`2.
`
`Fresenius is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of
`
`business at Three Corporate Drive, Lake Zurich, Illinois 60047. Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC was
`
`formerly known as APP Pharmaceuticals, LLC.
`
`3.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant B. Braun is a Pennsylvania corporation
`
`with its principal place of business at 824 Twelfth Avenue, Bethlehem, PA 18018-3524.
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00250-RGA Document 1 Filed 04/11/16 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 2
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`Subject Matter Jurisdiction
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`This action for patent infringement arises under 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28
`
`U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a), 2201, and 2202.
`
`Personal Jurisdiction Over B. Braun
`
`6.
`
`Upon information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over B. Braun
`
`because B. Braun through its affiliates and/or agents (1) has sought approval from the FDA to
`
`market and sell its proposed generic Diprivan® product throughout the United States, including
`
`in Delaware; (2) conducts business in this Judicial District; and (3) has engaged in continuous
`
`and systematic contacts with Delaware and/or purposefully availed itself of this forum by, among
`
`other things, marketing, making, shipping, using, offering to sell or selling, or causing others to
`
`use, offer to sell, or sell, B. Braun products in this Judicial District, and deriving substantial
`
`revenue from such activities. Upon information and belief, B. Braun utilizes the services of its
`
`registered agent, Corporation Service Company located at 2711 Centerville Rd., Suite 400,
`
`Wilmington, DE 19808, for its sales and marketing in Delaware. Upon information and belief,
`
`Corporation Service Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of
`
`Delaware.
`
`7.
`
`Additionally, B. Braun has been sued for patent infringement in this district and
`
`did not contest personal jurisdiction. See Hospira, Inc. v. B. Braun Medical, Inc., C.A. No. 13-
`
`819; see also Rydex Techs. LLC v. B. Braun Medical Inc. et al., C.A. No. 13-663. B. Braun has
`
`also purposefully availed itself of the rights and benefits of this Court by asserting counterclaims
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00250-RGA Document 1 Filed 04/11/16 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 3
`
`in lawsuits filed in this Court, and proactively filing suit for patent infringement in this district.
`
`See B. Braun Medical Inc. et al. v. Termuro Medical Corp. et al., CA No. 09-347.
`
`8.
`
`Upon information and belief, B. Braun has agreements with retailers, wholesalers
`
`or distributors providing for the distribution of its products in the State of Delaware.
`
`9.
`
`Upon information and belief, B. Braun has committed, or aided, abetted,
`
`contributed to and/or participated in the commission of the tortious action of patent infringement
`
`that has led to foreseeable harm and injury to Fresenius, which manufactures Diprivan®, for sale
`
`and use throughout the United States, including the State of Delaware.
`
`10.
`
`Upon information and belief, B. Braun has applied for FDA approval to market
`
`and sell a generic version of Diprivan® throughout the United States, including in Delaware.
`
`11.
`
`On February 24, 2016, B. Braun sent a letter to Fresenius, a Delaware Limited
`
`Liability Company, stating that it had filed ANDA No. 207929 seeking FDA approval to market
`
`a generic Diprivan® product prior to the expiration of the ’010 patent.
`
`12.
`
`Upon information and belief, B. Braun will market, sell, and offer for sale its
`
`proposed generic version of Diprivan® in the State of Delaware following FDA approval of that
`
`product.
`
`13.
`
`Upon information and belief, as a result of B. Braun’s marketing, selling, or
`
`offering for sale of its generic version of Diprivan® in the State of Delaware, Fresenius will lose
`
`sales of Diprivan® and be injured in the State of Delaware.
`
`14.
`
`Upon information and belief, B. Braun’s systematic and continuous business
`
`contacts within Delaware render it at home in Delaware.
`
`15.
`
`Upon information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over B. Braun
`
`for the reasons stated herein, including, inter alia, B. Braun’s activities in the forum, activities
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00250-RGA Document 1 Filed 04/11/16 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 4
`
`directed at the forum, significant contacts with the forum, and consent, all of which render B.
`
`Braun at home in the forum. Personal jurisdiction is proper at least under Acorda Therapeutics
`
`Inc. v. Mylan Pharms Inc., No. 2015-1456, 2016 WL 1077048 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
`
`Venue
`
`16.
`
`Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 and 1400(b).
`
`The Patent-in-Suit: United States Patent No. 8,476,010
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`17.
`
`The ʼ010 patent, entitled “Propofol Formulations with Non-Reactive Container
`
`Closures,” was duly and lawfully issued on July 2, 2013 to inventors Neil P. Desai, Andrew
`
`Yang, and Sherry Xiaopei Ci. The named inventors assigned the ʼ010 patent to APP
`
`Pharmaceuticals, LLC, which later changed its name to Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC.
`
`Accordingly, Fresenius is the owner of all rights, title, and interest in the ʼ010 patent. The ʼ010
`
`patent is listed in the FDA publication “Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence
`
`Evaluations,” commonly referred to as “The Orange Book” (“Orange Book”) with respect to
`
`Diprivan®. The ʼ010 patent will expire on June 1, 2025. A true and accurate copy of the ʼ010
`
`patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`The Diprivan® Drug Product
`
`18.
`
`Fresenius currently sells, promotes, distributes, and markets Diprivan® (propofol)
`
`injectable emulsion in the United States.
`
`19.
`
`Diprivan® is indicated, generally speaking, for the induction and maintenance of
`
`general anesthesia and sedation in certain patient populations.
`
`20.
`
`Fresenius holds an approved New Drug Application (“NDA”) No. 19627 under
`
`Section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 355(a) in connection
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00250-RGA Document 1 Filed 04/11/16 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 5
`
`with the Diprivan® 1% (propofol) injectable emulsion product containing 10 mg propofol per 1
`
`ml of emulsion.
`
`The B. Braun ANDA
`
`21.
`
`B. Braun filed with the FDA an ANDA under 21 U.S.C. § 355(j) seeking approval
`
`to manufacture, use, offer for sale, sell in and import into the United States a propofol injectable
`
`emulsion containing 10mg propofol per 1 ml of emulsion formulation, in 20 mL, 50 mL and 100
`
`mL vials, that B. Braun asserts is a generic copy of Diprivan® (“B. Braun’s generic Diprivan®
`
`products”) prior to the expiration of the ʼ010 patent.
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`The FDA assigned the B. Braun ANDA the number 207929.
`
`B. Braun filed with the FDA, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(A)(vii)(II), a
`
`certification that U.S. Patent Nos. 5,714,520; 5,731,355; 5,731,356 and 5,908,869 (“the ’520,
`
`’355, ’356, and ’869 patents”) have expired.
`
`24.
`
`B. Braun filed with the FDA, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 355(j)(2)(A)(vii)(IV), a
`
`certification alleging that the claims of the ʼ010 patent are invalid, unenforceable and/or would
`
`not be infringed by the manufacture, use, importation, sale or offer for sale of B. Braun’s generic
`
`Diprivan® products (“B. Braun’s Paragraph IV Certification”). B. Braun notified Fresenius of
`
`this certification, in a letter dated February 24, 2016 sent by U.S. Mail (“B. Braun Notice
`
`Letter”).
`
`25.
`
`In the B. Braun Notice Letter, B. Braun offered Fresenius confidential access to
`
`ANDA No. 207929 on terms and conditions set forth in an attached “Offer of Confidential
`
`Access” (“OCA”). The initial OCA provided by B. Braun contained various terms and
`
`conditions, several of which went above and beyond protections typically afforded in a
`
`protective order. Fresenius and B. Braun proceeded to negotiate the provisions of the OCA, and
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00250-RGA Document 1 Filed 04/11/16 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 6
`
`a final version of the OCA was executed by both parties on March 25, 2015.
`
`26.
`
`On April 4, 2016, Fresenius received certain abbreviated portions of ANDA No.
`
`207929 from B. Braun, pursuant to the OCA.
`
`27.
`
`Given the 45-day statutory deadline to file suit set forth in 21 U.S.C.
`
`§ 355(j)(5)(B)(iii) and due to the limited information Fresenius has received from B. Braun to
`
`date, Fresenius turns to the judicial process and the aid of discovery to obtain, under appropriate
`
`judicial safeguards, such information as is required to further confirm its allegations of
`
`infringement and to present to the Court evidence that B. Braun’s generic Diprivan® products fall
`
`within the scope of one or more claims of the ’010 patent.
`
`COUNT I FOR INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,476,010 BY B. BRAUN
`
`28.
`
`The allegations of paragraphs 1-27 are realleged and incorporated herein by
`
`reference.
`
`29.
`
`The use of B. Braun’s generic Diprivan® products is covered by one or more
`
`claims of the ʼ010 patent.
`
`30.
`
`The commercial manufacture, use, offer for sale, sale, marketing, distribution,
`
`and/or importation of B. Braun’s generic Diprivan® products would infringe one or more claims
`
`of the ʼ010 patent.
`
`31.
`
`B. Braun has infringed the ʼ010 patent by submitting and maintaining the B.
`
`Braun ANDA before the FDA seeking approval to market B. Braun’s generic Diprivan® products
`
`containing propofol before the expiration of the ʼ010 patent.
`
`32.
`
`B. Braun was aware of the ʼ010 patent when engaging in these knowing and
`
`purposeful activities and was aware that filing B. Braun’s ANDA with the Paragraph IV
`
`Certification with respect to the ʼ010 patent constituted an act of infringement of the ’010 patent.
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00250-RGA Document 1 Filed 04/11/16 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 7
`
`33.
`
`Upon information and belief, B. Braun intends to engage in the manufacture, use,
`
`offer for sale, sale, marketing, distribution, and/or importation of B. Braun’s generic Diprivan®
`
`products immediately and imminently upon approval of the B. Braun ANDA.
`
`34.
`
`The foregoing actions by B. Braun constitute and/or would constitute
`
`infringement of the ʼ010 patent.
`
`35.
`
`Upon information and belief, B. Braun acted without a reasonable basis for
`
`believing that it would not be liable for infringing the ʼ010 patent, actively inducing infringement
`
`of the ʼ010 patent, and/or contributing to the infringement by others of the ʼ010 patent.
`
`36.
`
`Fresenius will be substantially and irreparably harmed by B. Braun’s infringing
`
`activities unless the Court enjoins those activities. Fresenius will have no adequate remedy at
`
`law if B. Braun is not enjoined from the commercial manufacture, use, offer to sell, sale in, and
`
`importation into the United States of B. Braun’s generic Diprivan® products.
`
`37.
`
`B. Braun’s activities render this case an exceptional one, and Fresenius is entitled
`
`to an award of its reasonable attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Fresenius respectfully requests the following relief:
`
`a.
`
`A judgment that B. Braun’s submission of the B. Braun’s ANDA No. 207929
`
`infringes one or more claims of the ʼ010 patent and that the making, using, offering to sell, or
`
`selling in the United States, or importing into the United States of B. Braun’s generic Diprivan®
`
`products prior to the expiration of the ʼ010 patent will infringe of one or more claims of the
`
`patent;
`
`b.
`
`An Order pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(A) providing that the effective date of
`
`any FDA approval of B. Braun’s ANDA No. 207929 seeking approval to manufacture, use, offer
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00250-RGA Document 1 Filed 04/11/16 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 8
`
`for sale, sell in and import into the United States a propofol injectable emulsion containing 10mg
`
`propofol per 1 ml of emulsion formulation, in 20 mL, 50 mL and 100 mL vials, or any product or
`
`compound the use of which infringes the ʼ010 patent, shall be a date that is not earlier than the
`
`expiration of the patent;
`
`c.
`
`An Order permanently enjoining Defendants and all persons acting in concert
`
`with Defendants from commercially manufacturing, using, offering for sale, selling, marketing,
`
`distributing, or importing B. Braun’s generic Diprivan® products, or any other product or
`
`compound the use of which infringes the ʼ010 patent, or inducing or contributing to the
`
`infringement of the ʼ010 patent until after the expiration of the patent;
`
`d.
`
`An Order enjoining Defendants and all persons acting in concert with Defendants
`
`from seeking, obtaining, or maintaining approval of the B. Braun’s ANDA No. 207929 before
`
`the expiration of the ʼ010 patent;
`
`e.
`
`An award of Plaintiff’s damages or other monetary relief to compensate Plaintiff
`
`if Defendants engage in the commercial manufacture, use, offer to sell, sale or marketing or
`
`distribution in, or importation into the United States of Defendants’ generic Diprivan® products,
`
`or any product or compound the use of which infringes the ʼ010 patent, prior to the expiration of
`
`the patent in accordance with 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(4)(C);
`
`f.
`
`A judgment that this is an exceptional case and awarding Plaintiff its attorneys’
`
`fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285;
`
`An award of Plaintiff’s reasonable costs and expenses in this action; and
`
`An award of any further and additional relief to Plaintiff as this Court deems just
`
`g.
`
`h.
`
`and proper.
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 1:16-cv-00250-RGA Document 1 Filed 04/11/16 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 9
`
`
`Dated: April 11, 2016
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Of Counsel:
`
`Daryl L. Wiesen
`John T. Bennett
`Sam Sherry
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`Exchange Place
`53 State Street
`Boston, MA 02109
`(617) 570-1000
`(617) 523-1231 (fax)
`DWiesen@goodwinprocter.com
`JBennett@goodwinprocter.com
`SSherry@goodwinprocter.com
`
`Krupa Parikh
`GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
`901 New York Ave. NW
`Washington, D.C. 20009
`(202) 346-4000
`(202) 346-4444 (fax)
`KParikh@goodwinprocter.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`FARNAN LLP
`
`
`/s/ Brian E. Farnan
`Brian Farnan(Bar No. 4089)
`Michael J. Farnan (Bar No. 5165)
`919 North Market Street
`12th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`Phone: 302-777-0300
`Fax: 302-777-0301
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC
`
`
`9
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket