`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS LLC
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`Civil Action No. 16-116-RGA
`
`F ACEBOOK, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`The Markman hearing on Sound View's patents, scheduled for March 29, 2017, f ust be
`
`ORDER
`
`narrowed. The parties should submit a joint letter to the Court no later than March 20, io 17,
`
`I
`
`identifying the asserted claims in each patent, explaining the importance of construction 1of the
`
`approximately 54 to 56 disputed 1 terms to other issues in the case (i.e., if a term is constfed as
`
`I
`
`Defendant asks, the Defendant's product does not infringe because .... ; or is invalid becahse ... ;
`
`or, if construed as Plaintiff asks, the Defendant's product infringes because .... ; ) . Each Jarty
`
`should also identify, in order of priority, the terms that are most important to the party tol have
`
`I
`
`argued at the hearing. The Court anticipates that no more than ten terms will be heard at the
`
`hearing. Depending upon what is in the submission, the Court may select the terms to b¢ heard,
`
`I
`
`may possibly narrow the claims at issue, or both, and/or may postpone the hearing until the
`
`parties further narrow the claims and terms.
`
`1 The Court notes that the parties have six agreed-upon constructions. The ratio of
`agreed-upon to disputed terms is considerably outside the norm.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
