`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`F ACEBOOK, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Civil Action No. 16-116-RGA
`
`ORDER
`
`The parties have raised a question about what happened at a prior discovery dispute
`
`conference. (D.I. 188, 190). I obtained the transcript. (D.1. 193). I have read the relevant parts
`
`of it, as well as the parties' letters.
`
`The Rule 30(b)(6) testimony I intended to permit Sound View was for the purpose of
`
`allowing Sound View to find out "how PHP works." (D.I. 193 at p.19). The idea was not that
`
`Face book had to explain how PHP works in light of the prior art, but that Sound View could ask
`
`questions about how PHP works with the knowledge of what the prior art was that Facebook was
`
`asserting. My permitting the deposition of two witnesses was based on the understanding that
`
`the same two witnesses had previously been deposed on how PHP works, but without Sound
`
`View knowing the correct asserted prior art. Based on the parties' letters, one of the two
`
`witnesses is Mr. Ho. Even now, I do not think I knew at the hearing who the second Facebook
`
`witness was, but based on the parties' letters, it is Mr. Sereni or no one. I understand the date
`
`offered for Mr. Sereni was today; thus, if Sound View wants to depose him, the parties should
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00116-RGA Document 196 Filed 09/08/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 3536
`
`reach agreement on a different date to do that.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED this <?.day of September 2017.
`
`[~, I< ~cJ ~,~
`
`United States Distric Judge
`
`I
`l
`
`i
`f
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
