`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Civil Action No. 1: 16-cv-116-RGA
`
`v.
`
`JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`FACEBOOK, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`~l CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
`
`WHEREAS the parties submitted claim construction briefing and the Court held a claim
`
`construction hearing on March 29, 2017; and
`
`WHEREAS the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion regarding claim construction on
`
`May 19, 2017 (D.I. 100);
`
`Having considered the submission of the parties and hearing oral argument on these
`
`matters, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the terms below, as used in the asserted claims of
`
`U.S. Patent Nos. 5,991,845 ("the '845 Patent"), 6,125,371 ("the '371 Patent"), 6,732,181 ("the
`
`'181 Patent"), 7,366,786 ("the '786 Patent"), 7,412,486 ("the '486 Patent"), and 8,135,860 ("the
`
`'860 Patent"), are construed as follows:
`
`U.S. Patent No. 5,991,845
`
`1.
`
`The term "spinning" in claim 13 is used in the plain and ordinary sense. The Court
`
`will hold a hearing to take expert testimony on the meaning of "spinning" to a person of ordinary
`
`skill in the art.
`
`
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00116-RGA Document 113 Filed 05/30/17 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 2585
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,125,371
`
`2.
`
`No construction is necessary for the term "an aging controller that monitors a
`
`measurable characteristic of said memory and deletes ones of said multiple versions of said ones
`
`of said data records in response to said time stamp and said measurable characteristic thereby to
`
`increase a capacity of said memory." The term is not indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § l 12(f).
`
`U.S. Patent No. 6,732,181
`
`3.
`
`The term "means at said server to compare said user input information with stored
`
`information and based on user verification and user access type provide said user with a list of
`
`other users for which said user has access" in claim 5 is construed as:
`Function
`"comparing said user input information with
`stored information and based on user
`verification and user access type providing said
`user with a list of other users for which said
`user has access"
`
`Structure
`"a login CGI, the system shared memory's
`simple user database, Web API, System API,
`and a drop box selection menu as described in
`col. 9:34-36 or depicted in Figure 13"
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,366,786
`
`4.
`
`The term "means to authorize log in of said user if said ID and password agree
`
`with said stored information and if said user status is enabled" in claim 1 is construed as:
`Function
`Structure
`"authorizing log in and verifying user status as
`enabled"
`
`Indefinite.
`
`5.
`
`Claim 1 of the '786 patent is therefore indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § l 12(f).
`
`U.S. Patent No. 7,412,486
`
`6.
`
`Claim 19 of the '486 patent is indefinite under IP XL Holdings, L.L. C. v.
`
`Amazon.com, Inc., 430 F.3d 1377 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,135,860
`
`7.
`
`No construction is necessary for the term "server" in claims 1 and 13. The term is
`
`not indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § l 12(f).
`
`2
`
`
`
`>--
`
`'
`
`'
`
`•
`
`Case 1:16-cv-00116-RGA Document 113 Filed 05/30/17 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 2586
`
`8.
`
`The term "virtual client device" in claim 13 is construed as "simulated or
`
`artificially created client device."
`
`9.
`
`No construction is necessary for the term "interpolating proxy server" in claim 18.
`
`The term is not indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112(£).
`
`SO ORDERED this .2z day of Mf!"?'i
`, 2017
`~~s~
`
`3
`
`