Case 1:15-cv-00807-RGA-CJB Document 271 Filed 02/08/19 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 12002
`
`-1-vltJ ~ flXIVL cciwt-~ 8111 d~ 6f ~btu~, :M/1,
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~ ..
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`ALARM.COM, INC. and
`ICN ACQUISITION, LLC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`V.
`
`SECURENET TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) C.A. No. 15-807 (RGA)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`JURY VERDICT FORM
`
`Instructions: When answering the following questions and filling out this Verdict Form, please
`
`follow the directions provided throughout the form. Your answer to each question must be
`
`unanimous. Please refer to the Jury Instructions for guidance on the law applicable to the subject
`
`matter covered by each question.
`
`QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
`
`We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return
`
`them under the instructions of this court as our verdict in this case.
`
`Page 1 of 9
`10753754/1
`
`
`
`-1-vltJ ~ flXIVL cciwt-~ 8111 d~ 6f ~btu~, :M/1,
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~ ..
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`ALARM.COM, INC. and
`ICN ACQUISITION, LLC,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`V.
`
`SECURENET TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) C.A. No. 15-807 (RGA)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`JURY VERDICT FORM
`
`Instructions: When answering the following questions and filling out this Verdict Form, please
`
`follow the directions provided throughout the form. Your answer to each question must be
`
`unanimous. Please refer to the Jury Instructions for guidance on the law applicable to the subject
`
`matter covered by each question.
`
`QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
`
`We, the jury, unanimously agree to the answers to the following questions and return
`
`them under the instructions of this court as our verdict in this case.
`
`Page 1 of 9
`10753754/1
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00807-RGA-CJB Document 271 Filed 02/08/19 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 12003
`
`I.
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,073,931 (THE '931 PATENT)
`
`1.
`
`Have Plaintiffs proved by a preponderance of the evidence that SecureN et directly
`infringed any of the following claims of the '931 patent?
`
`"Yes" is a finding for Plaintiffs. "No" is a finding for SecureNet.
`
`Yes
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 9
`
`No
`
`~
`'6
`
`Go to Question 2.
`
`2.
`
`Have Plaintiffs proved by a preponderance of the evidence that SecureNet actively
`induced a third party to directly infringe any of the following claims of the '931
`patent?
`
`"Yes" is a finding for Plaintiffs. "No" is a finding for SecureNet.
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 9
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`r:g
`~
`
`Go to Question 3.
`
`3.
`
`Have Plaintiffs proved by a preponderance of the evidence that SecureNet
`contributed to the direct infringement by a third party of any of the following claims
`of the '931 patent?
`
`"Yes" is a finding for Plaintiffs. "No " is a finding for SecureNet.
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 9
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`?1
`<t
`
`Go to Section II.
`
`Page 2 of9
`10753754/1
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00807-RGA-CJB Document 271 Filed 02/08/19 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 12004
`
`II.
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,473,619 (THE '619 PATENT)
`
`4.
`
`Have Plaintiffs proved by a preponderance of the evidence that SecureNet directly
`infringed any of the following claims of the '619 patent?
`
`"Yes" is a finding for Plaintiffs. "No" is a finding for SecureNet.
`
`Yes
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 55
`
`No
`?
`~
`
`Go to Question 5.
`
`5.
`
`Have Plaintiffs proved by a preponderance of the evidence that SecureNet actively
`induced a third party to directly infringe any of the following claims of the '619
`patent?
`
`"Yes " is a finding for Plaintiffs. "No" is a finding for SecureNet.
`
`Yes
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 55
`
`No
`<?
`~
`
`Go to Question 6.
`
`Page 3 of9
`10753754/ 1
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00807-RGA-CJB Document 271 Filed 02/08/19 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 12005
`
`6.
`
`Have Plaintiffs proved by a preponderance of the evidence that SecureNet
`contributed to the direct infringement by a third party of any of the following claims
`of the '619 patent?
`
`"Yes" is a finding for Plaintiffs. "No " is a finding for SecureNet.
`
`Yes
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 55
`
`No
`'ii
`~
`
`Go to Section III.
`
`Page 4 of 9
`10753754/1
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00807-RGA-CJB Document 271 Filed 02/08/19 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 12006
`
`III.
`
`INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,478,844 (THE '844 PATENT)
`
`7.
`
`Have Plaintiffs proved by a preponderance of the evidence that SecureNet actively
`induced a third party to directly infringe the following claim of the '844 patent?
`
`Yes " is a finding for Plaintiffs. "No " is a finding for SecureN et.
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`I Claim 481
`
`Go to Question 8.
`
`8.
`
`Have Plaintiffs proved by a preponderance of the evidence that SecureNet
`contributed to the direct infringement by a third party of the following claim of the
`'844 patent?
`
`Yes" is a finding for Plaintiffs. "No" is a finding for SecureNet.
`
`Yes
`
`No
`
`I Claim 481
`
`Go to Section IV.
`
`Page 5 of 9
`10753754/1
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00807-RGA-CJB Document 271 Filed 02/08/19 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 12007
`
`IV. WILLFULNESS
`
`If you have found that any claim of the Asserted Patents is infringed (by answering "Yes" to any
`
`of Questions 1-8), then complete this section.
`
`Otherwise, skip to Section V.
`
`9.
`
`Have Plaintiffs proved by a preponderance of the evidence that SecureNet's
`infringement of any claim of the Asserted Patents was willful?
`
`"Yes" is a finding for Plaintiffs. "No " is a finding for SecureNet.
`
`Yes
`- - -
`
`No
`- - -
`
`Go to Section V.
`
`Page 6 of9
`10753754/1
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00807-RGA-CJB Document 271 Filed 02/08/19 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 12008
`
`V.
`
`VALIDITY OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,073,931 (THE '931 PATENT)
`
`10.
`
`Has SecureNet proved by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following
`claims of the '931 patent is invalid because it would have been obvious to a person
`of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention of the '931 patent?
`
`"Yes" is a finding for SecureNet. "No" is a finding for Plaintiffs.
`
`Yes
`
`Claim 1
`
`Claim 9
`
`No
`S9
`&>
`
`Go to Section VI.
`
`Page 7 of9
`10753754/ 1
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00807-RGA-CJB Document 271 Filed 02/08/19 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 12009
`
`VI.
`
`DAMAGES
`
`If you have found any claim of the '619 or '844 patents is infringed (by answering "Yes" to any
`
`of Questions 4-8) or if you have found that any claim of the '9 31 patent is both infringed (by
`
`answering "Yes" to any of Questions 1-3) and that the same claim is not invalid (by answering
`
`"No" to Question 10), then complete this section.
`
`Otherwise, skip to Section VII.
`
`A.
`
`11.
`
`Lost Profits
`
`Have Plaintiffs proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Alarm.com is
`entitled to lost profits?
`
`"Yes " is afindingfor Alarm.com. "No" is afindingfor SecureNet.
`
`Yes
`- - -
`
`No
`- - -
`
`If you answered "Yes" to Question 11, then go to Question 12.
`
`If you answered "No" to Question 11, then skip to Question 13.
`
`12. What lost profits damages, if any, do you find Plaintiffs have proved by a
`preponderance of the evidence that they are entitled to recover?
`
`$ ______ _
`
`Go to Question 13.
`
`B.
`
`13.
`
`Reasonable Royalty
`
`For any sales for which you did not award lost profits, what have Plaintiffs proved
`by a preponderance of the evidence that they are entitled to as a reasonable royalty
`for sales of SecureNet's Accused Products?
`
`$ - - - - - - -
`
`Go to Section VII.
`
`Page 8 of9
`10753754/ 1
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00807-RGA-CJB Document 271 Filed 02/08/19 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 12010
`
`VII. CONCLUSION
`
`You have reached the end of the verdict form. Review the completed form to ensure that
`
`it accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. All jurors should then sign the verdict form
`
`in the space below and notify the Court Security Officer that you have reached a verdict. The
`
`Foreperson should retain possession of the verdict form and bring it to the courtroom with the jury.
`Date d- /g / ,:i{) / 9
`I
`I
`
`Juror
`
`Page 9 of 9
`10753754/ 1
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
