throbber
Case 1:15-cv-00697-RGA Document 93 Filed 05/10/17 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 970
`
`
`
`
`
`Ryan P. Newell
`TEL (302) 888-6434
`FAX (302) 757-7302
`EMAIL rnewell@connollygallagher.com
`
`
`May 10, 2017
`
`
`Via Electronic Filing
`The Honorable Richard G. Andrews
`U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
`J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
`Wilmington, Delaware 19801
`
`Re: Hospira Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC, C.A. No 15-697-RGA
`
`
`
`Dear Judge Andrews:
`
`We represent Hospira Inc. (“Hospira”) in the above captioned matter. We write in
`response to the letter Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC (“Amneal”) filed earlier this afternoon
`regarding trial scheduling. Regardless of the allegations in Amneal’s letter, which we dispute,
`the reality is that the parties attempted in good faith to find a mutually agreeable timeframe to
`suggest to the Court for trial in July or August, but failed. Hospira remains available to hold trial
`during the August 7-17 timeframe suggested to Amneal yesterday.
`
`Further, while we prefer not to take issue with the details surrounding counsels’ attempts
`to reschedule trial, certain statements in Amneal’s letter require clarification:
`
`This past weekend after the Court informed the parties on Friday afternoon that
`trial would need to be rescheduled, the parties discussed whether May 31 to June
`1 was a viable option. While Hospira would have preferred to reschedule trial for
`May, we understood that conflicts for both parties precluded trial in that
`timeframe.
`
`Hospira reached out Amneal yesterday to discuss specific trial dates to suggest to
`the Court. Hospira provided twelve dates it “believe[d]” it could offer at that
`time, with the July 27-28, 31 dates being least preferable. Amneal did not and has
`not provided dates for consideration to Hospira.
`
`Until its letter submission to the Court, Amneal never communicated that it was
`indeed available for trial beginning July 27, 2017. Amneal did not even indicate
`its availability for
`trial during
`that
`timeframe yesterday after Hospira
`communicated its unavailability.
`
` •
`
`
`
` •
`
`
`
` •
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:15-cv-00697-RGA Document 93 Filed 05/10/17 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 971
`The Honorable Richard G. Andrews
`May 10, 2017
`Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`
`Hospira called Amneal’s counsel this morning to further discuss scheduling
`issues. Hospira did not indicate instruction from its client to simply “block out”
`July. Hospira has actual scheduling issues with the July 27 date, including in-
`house client, expert witness, and may-call fact witness availability.
`
`•
`
` •
`
`
`
`Hospira only suggested to Amneal that it would seek availability from its
`witnesses in September to be proactive, in case the Court asked the parties to look
`into that month for availability.
`
`
`We remain available at the convenience of the Court.
`
`
`
`cc:
`
`All counsel of record
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Ryan P. Newell
`
`Ryan P. Newell (#4744)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket