throbber
Case 1:15-cv-00547-JFB-SRF Document 412 Filed 03/28/19 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 21613
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS, LLC,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`) Civil Action No. 15-542-JFB-SRF
`
`
`
`V.
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`______________________________________
`
`)
`
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS, LLC,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`) Civil Action No. 15-543-JFB-SRF
`
`
`
`V.
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`HTC CORPORATION and
`)
`
`
`HTC AMERJCA, INC.,
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`______________________________________
`
`)
`
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS, LLC,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`) Civil Action No. 15-544-JFB-SRF
`
`
`
`V.
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`LENOVO GROUP LTD., LENOVO
`)
`
`(UNITED STATES) INC., and
`
`)
`
`MOTOROLA MOBILITY,
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`______________________________________
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 1:15-cv-00547-JFB-SRF Document 412 Filed 03/28/19 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 21614
`
`
`)
`
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS, LLC,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`) Civil Action No. 15-545-JFB-SRF
`
`
`
`V.
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`)
`and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`
`)
`AMERICA, INC.
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`_____________________________________ )
`
`)
`
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS, LLC,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`) Civil Action No. 15-546-JFB-SRF
`
`
`
`V.
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`ZTE (USA) INC.,
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`_____________________________________ )
`
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`V.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`MICROSOFT MOBILE OY and
`
`NOKIA INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) Civil Action No. 15-547-JFB-SRF
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This matter is before the Court on its own motion for docket control purposes.
`
`MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
`
`Pursuant to the Memorandum and Order dated February 21, 2019 in Evolved Wireless,
`
`LLC v. Apple, Inc., No. 1:15cv542 (D.I. 468).
`
`

`

`Case 1:15-cv-00547-JFB-SRF Document 412 Filed 03/28/19 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 21615
`
`
`
`IT IS ORDERED that the following motions in the related cases are denied
`
`without prejudice to reassertion: D.I. 360 in Evolved Wireless, LLC v. HTC Corp. and
`
`HTC America, Inc., Case No. 1:15cv543; D.I. 325 in Evolved v. Lenovo Corp. and
`
`Motorola Mobility, LLC, Case No. 1:15cv544; D.I. 365 in Evolved v. Samsung Elecs.
`
`Co., Samsung Elecs. America, Inc., Case No.1:15cv545; D.I. 327 in Evolved v. ZTE
`
`(USA) Corp., Case No. 1:15cv546; and D.I. 345 in Evolved v. Microsoft Corp., Case No.
`
`1:15cv547.
`
`
`
`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the Court’s Memorandum and Order
`
`dated March 13, 2019 (D.I. 498 at 3 n.2), defendant ZTE’s (Sealed) Motion to Strike
`
`Lump Sum Opinion of Plaintiff's Damages Expert (D.I. 254 in Evolved v. ZTE (USA)
`
`Corp., Case No. 1:15cv546) is denied.
`
`DATED this 28th day of March, 2019.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BY THE COURT:
`
`s/ Joseph F. Bataillon
`Senior United States District Judge
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket