throbber
Case 1:15-cv-00545-JFB-SRF Document 409 Filed 08/30/18 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 23387
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 15–542–JFB–SRF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 15–545–JFB–SRF
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`
`
`
`EVOLVED WIRELESS, LLC,
`
`
`
`
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
`and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`Defendant.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`PLAINTIFF EVOLVED WIRELESS, LLC’S MOTIONS IN LIMINE
`Plaintiff Evolved Wireless, LLC hereby moves the Court in the above-captioned cases
`(unless otherwise noted) to grant the following motions in limine:
`1. Motion in Limine No. 1 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Related to Sales of
`Unaccused Products or Accused Products Outside the United States;
`2. Motion in Limine No. 2 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Related to Alleged
`Royalty Stacking;
`3. Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Related to
`Defendants Being “Locked-In” or to “Patent Hold-Up;”
`
`

`

`Case 1:15-cv-00545-JFB-SRF Document 409 Filed 08/30/18 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 23388
`
`4. Motion in Limine No. 4 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Related to a Lump
`Sum Damages Award That Would Provide Unfettered Rights to Practice the
`Asserted Patents;
`5. Motion in Limine No. 5 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Related to a Potential
`Injunction;
`6. Motion in Limine No. 6 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Related to Patent
`Trial and Appeal Board Final Written Decisions;
`7. Motion in Limine No. 7 to Exclude Redacted Versions of any LGE/Qualcomm
`Agreements;
`8. Motion in Limine No. 8 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Related to U.S.
`Patent No. 8,219,097;
`9. Motion in Limine No. 9 to Exclude any Non-Produced Evidence and Argument
`Regarding Licenses or License Negotiations;
`10. Motion in Limine No. 10 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Related to
`Defendants’ Own Specific Patents Related to LTE Technology;
`11. Motion in Limine No. 11 to Exclude Evidence and Argument that Qualcomm Is or
`Should Be the Correct Defendant; and
`12. Motion in Limine No. 12 to Exclude Evidence and Argument Referring to
`Evolved Wireless with Pejorative, Derogative, or Negative Terms.
`Evolved Wireless, LLC additionally moves the Court, in C.A. No. 15-542 only, to grant
`the following motion in limine:
`Exclude Evidence and Argument Related to Damages Allegedly Suffered as a
`Result of Evolved Wireless’s Alleged Breach of “FRAND” Obligations.
`Evolved Wireless, LLC additionally moves the Court, in C.A. No. 15-545 only, to grant
`the following motion in limine:
`Exclude any Evidence from Fact Witnesses Regarding the Operation of
`Qualcomm’s Source Code in the LTE Chipset.
`
`

`

`Case 1:15-cv-00545-JFB-SRF Document 409 Filed 08/30/18 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 23389
`
`Pursuant to the pretrial order (D.I. 399, 400) and the Court’s oral order during the August
`28, 2018 hearing, the grounds for these Motions in Limine will be set forth in Plaintiff’s opening
`briefing filed concurrently with these Motions.1
`
`Dated: August 30, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`FARNAN LLP
`
`
`
`/s/ Brian E. Farnan
`Brian E. Farnan (Bar No. 4089)
`Michael J. Farnan (Bar No. 5165)
`919 N. Market Street, 12th Floor
`Wilmington, Delaware 19801
`(302) 777–0300
`(302) 777–0301
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`
`Christopher K. Larus (admitted pro hac vice)
`Marla R. Butler (admitted pro hac vice)
`Ryan M. Schultz (admitted pro hac vice)
`John K. Harting (admitted pro hac vice)
`Benjamen C. Linden (admitted pro hac vice)
`Anthony F. Schlehuber (admitted pro hac vice)
`Rajin S. Olson (admitted pro hac vice)
`ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
`800 LaSalle Avenue, Suite 2800
`Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
`Telephone: (612) 349–8500
`Facsimile: (612) 339–4181
`clarus@robinskaplan.com
`mbutler@robinskaplan.com
`rschultz@robinskaplan.com
`jharting@robinskaplan.com
`blinden@robinskaplan.com
`aschlehuber@robinskaplan.com
`rolson@robinskaplan.com
`
`
`
`
`1 For avoidance of any confusion, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation as entered by the Court
`(D.I. 399, 400), one brief will be filed in both matters regarding Joint Motions in Limine 1-12
`and separate briefs will be filed in C.A. No. 15-542 and C.A. No. 15-545 regarding those
`motions addressed to the individual Defendants.
`
`

`

`Case 1:15-cv-00545-JFB-SRF Document 409 Filed 08/30/18 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 23390
`
`Annie Huang (admitted pro hac vice)
`ROBINS KAPLAN LLP
`399 Park Avenue, Suite 3600
`New York, NY 10022
`Telephone: (212) 980-7400
`Facsimile: (212) 980-7499
`ahuang@robinskaplan.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff Evolved Wireless, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket