`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`TAKE-TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC. and
`2K SPORTS, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) C.A. No. 15-228 (RGA)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`C.A. No. 15-282 (RGA)
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`) C.A. No. 15-311 (RGA)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`STIPULATION
`
`WHEREAS, on November 23, 2015, the parties submitted competing forms of a
`
`proposed protective order that included, among other things, competing provisions regarding the
`
`review of source code;
`
`WHEREAS, on December 1, 2015, the Court issued an order adopting the source code
`
`provisions contained in Defendants' proposed protective order (the "December 1 Order");
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00311-RGA Document 49 Filed 01/04/16 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 1111
`
`WHEREAS, on December 7, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the
`
`Court's December 1 Order (the "Motion for Reconsideration");
`
`WHEREAS, on December 8, 2015, Defendants filed a revised proposed protective order
`
`to be consistent with the Court's December 1 Order ("the Interim Protective Order");
`
`WHEREAS, the Motion for Reconsideration has not been adjudicated; and
`
`WHEREAS, the parties agree that entering the Interim Protective Order is without
`
`prejudice to Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration and is beneficial because inspection of
`
`Defendants' source code began the week of December 28, 2015;
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that:
`
`1.
`
`The Interim Protective Order shall govern Plaintiffs review of Defendants'
`
`source code and the parties, their representatives and their retained experts shall be bound by the
`
`terms of the Interim Protective Order, including, inter alia, any requirement that certain parties
`
`execute a form of undertaking before viewing or receiving Designated Material (as defined in the
`
`Interim Protective Order);
`
`2.
`
`If the Court grants Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration or otherwise modifies
`
`the Protective Order, any changes to the Protective Order (the "Revised Protective Order") will
`
`be considered to be in effect retroactively to the date this stipulation is entered. Any restrictions
`
`contained in the Interim Protective order that are not contained in any Revised Protective Order
`
`shall be null and void upon entry of any Revised Protective Order;
`
`3.
`
`If the Court denies Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration and does not otherwise
`
`modify the Protective Order, the Interim Protective Order shall continue to be binding in this
`
`case.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00311-RGA Document 49 Filed 01/04/16 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 1112
`
`4.
`
`Entering into this stipulation does not waive or moot Plaintiff's pending Motion
`
`for Reconsideration.
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Paul J. Andre
`Lisa Kobialka
`James R. Hannah
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS &
`FRANKELLLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`(650) 752-1700
`
`Aaron M. Frankel
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS &
`FRANKELLLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`(212) 715-9100
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`Michael A. Tomasulo
`David P. Enzrninger
`Dae Hee Cho
`David K. Lin
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`333 S. Grand Avenue, 38th Floor
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`(213) 615-1700
`
`Daniel K. Webb
`Sarah J. Kalerrnis
`WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
`35 W. Wacker Drive
`Chicago, IL 60601
`(312) 558-5600
`
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`
`By: Isl Philip A. Rovner
`Philip A. Rovner (#3215)
`Jonathan A. Choa (#5319)
`Hercules Plaza
`P.O. Box 951
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 984-6000
`provner@potteranderson. corn
`jchoa@potteranderson.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`
`By: Isl Jack B. Blumenfeld
`Jack B. Blumenfeld (#1014)
`Stephen J. Kraftschik (#5623)
`1201 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 1347
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 658-9200
`jblurnenfeld@rnnat.com
`skraftschik@rnnat.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`
`3
`
`
`
`.,j'
`
`T
`
`1
`
`Joi
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00311-RGA Document 49 Filed 01/04/16 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 1113
`
`DAIBD: r"" 'j:,. hJ ll
`
`\ 1
`
`H~f~
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`4