throbber
Case 1:15-cv-00228-RGA Document 18 Filed 06/16/15 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 986
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC, a Delaware )
`Limited Liability Corporation,
`
`)
`
`))
`
`)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.,
`a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
`C.A. No. 15-228-RGA
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`))
`
`))
`
`))
`
`PLAINTIFF ACCELERATION BAY LLC’S OPPOSITION TO
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.’S JOINDER IN MOTION TO DISMISS
`JOINT INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS FILED BY ELECTRONIC ARTS, INC.
`
`On May 4, 2015, Defendant, Activision Blizzard, Inc. (“Activision”), filed a motion to
`
`dismiss the claims for induced infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,732,147, 6,910,069 and
`
`6,920,497 (collectively the “Method Patents”) in Acceleration Bay LLC’s (“Acceleration Bay”)
`
`Amended Complaint (D.I. 7). D.I. 12. On June 1, 2015, Activision filed a joinder to Electronic
`
`Arts Inc.’s (“EA”) motion to dismiss filed in C.A. No. 15-282-RGA, D.I. 11-12 on May 21,
`
`2015. D.I. 17. By its joinder, Activision seeks to dismiss the claims for direct infringement of
`
`the Method Patents. While it incorporated EA’s motion to dismiss and supporting opening brief,
`
`Activision did not file a separate brief in support of its joinder.
`
`Therefore, Acceleration Bay hereby incorporates by reference its Opposition Brief filed
`
`against EA and requests that the Court deny Activision’s request to dismiss Acceleration Bay’s
`
`claims for direct infringement of the Method Patents. C.A. No. 15-282-RGA, D.I. 14. For the
`
`same reasons stated in its Opposition Brief filed against EA, Activision’s request to dismiss the
`
`direct infringement claims of the Method Patents should be denied because (1) Acceleration Bay
`
`

`
`Case 1:15-cv-00228-RGA Document 18 Filed 06/16/15 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: 987
`
`plausibly pleads that Activision, acting alone, performs all of the steps of the claims of the
`
`Method Patents and thereby satisfies the requirements set forth in Form 18 for direct
`
`infringement; and (2) because Activision has direction and control over its users, developers and
`
`customers, giving rise to direct infringement under a joint infringement theory due to
`
`Activision’s vicarious liability.
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Paul J. Andre
`Lisa Kobialka
`James R. Hannah
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS &
`FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`(650) 752-1700
`
`Dated: June 16, 2015
`1192985
`
`POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
`
`By: /s/ Philip A. Rovner
`Philip A. Rovner (#3215)
`Jonathan A. Choa (#5319)
`Hercules Plaza
`P.O. Box 951
`Wilmington, DE 19899
`(302) 984-6000
`provner@potteranderson.com
`jchoa@potteranderson.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Acceleration Bay LLC
`
`2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket