`Case 1:15—cv—OO311—RGA Document 151 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 3 Page|D #: 4152
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
`
`Defendant.
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`ELECTRONIC ARTS INC .,
`
`Defendant.
`
`ACCELERATION BAY LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`V.
`
`TAKE—TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE,
`
`INC., ROCKSTAR GAMES, INC. and
`2K SPORTS, INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`\.Z\_/\é\/\¢’\é\./\/\./\./§/\/\2€$/\./9/Q/\./%\/\/Q/Q/\./\/9/\./€
`
`C.A. No. 15-228 (RGA)
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`C.A. No. 15—282 (RGA)
`
`C.A. No. 15-311 (RGA)
`
`LETTER TO THE HONORABLE RICHARD G. ANDREWS
`
`FROM PHILIP A. ROVNER, ESQ.
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00311-RGA Document 151 Filed 06/24/16 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 4153
`Case 1:15—cv—OO311—RGA Document 151 Filed 06/24/16 Page 2 of 3 Page|D #: 4153
`
`,
`
`
`\
`
`,
`
`W
`
`
`
`POTTGI’
`Anderson
`Corroon LLP
`
`1313 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 951
`
`Wilmington, DE l9899-O95l
`wwwpoilercinderson.com
`
`302 984 6000
`
`Philip A. Rovner
`Partner
`provner@potteronderson.com
`(302) 984-6140 Direct Phone
`(302) 658-1 192 Fox
`
`June l7, 2016
`
`BY CM/ECF & HAND DELIVERY
`The Honorable Richard G. Andrews
`
`U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
`
`PUBLIC VERSION
`
`U.S. Courthouse
`
`844 North King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`
`June 24, 2016
`
`Re:
`
`Acceleration Bay LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al.
`D. Del., C.A. No. 15-228-RGA, 15~282-RGA, l5-31 1—RGA
`
`Dear Judge Andrews:
`
`Further to the Court’s June 3, 2016 Order in the above-referenced actions (e. g. C.A. No.
`15-282-RGA, D.I. 149), I write to inform the Court that Boeing will not be joining these cases.
`Instead, Boeing and Plaintiff Acceleration Bay entered into the attached Amended and Restated
`Patent Purchase Agreement and Patent License Agreement, which confirm that Acceleration Bay
`has standing to pursue its claims against the Defendants without Boeing. See Exhibits A and B.
`In view of the foregoing, Acceleration Bay respectfully requests that the above-referenced
`actions be dismissed without prejudice. See Univ. ofPittsburgh v. Varian Med. Sys., Inc., 569
`F.3d 1328, 1332 (Fed. Cir. 2009) (reversing dismissal with prejudice of patent action for lack of
`standing: “The district court should have dismissed the action without prejudice, which would
`allow Pitt to file a second action with the standing defect cured through the joinder of the proper
`parties or an assignment of the necessary patent rights.”). A proposed order is attached hereto.
`Acceleration Bay will now refile complaints against the Defendants. The new complaints do not
`add any additional patents and do not change the currently accused products. Acceleration Bay,
`therefore, respectfully requests that the Court reserve the current trial dates, as only minor
`adjustments to the schedule will be necessary in View of the resolution of this standing issue
`within two weeks of the Court’s Order.
`
`Yesterday, before the deadline for Acceleration Bay to cure prudential standing or
`dismissal of the aboVe~referenced actions, Defendants filed declaratory judgment actions against
`Acceleration Bay in the District Court for the Northern District of California. 5:l6—cv-03375,
`5:l6—cv—03377 and 5:16-cv -03378. Defendants only named Acceleration Bay as a party to those
`actions, confirming that, in View of the amended agreement with Boeing, Acceleration Bay has
`standing to proceed against Defendants.
`
`
`
`Case 1:15-cv-00311-RGA Document 151 Filed 06/24/16 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 4154
`Case 1:15—cv—OO311—RGA Document 151 Filed 06/24/16 Page 3 of 3 Page|D #: 4154
`
`The Honorable Richard G. Andrews
`
`June 17, 2016 PUBLIC VERSION June 24, 2016
`
`Page 2
`
`Respectfully,
`
`/s/ Philip A. Rovner
`
`Philip A. Rovner (#3215)
`
`PAR/mah/ 1226729
`
`All Counsel of Record (Via ECF Filing, Electronic Mail)
`Co:
`Attachments