`Case 1:14—cv—O1453—LPS Document 27 Filed 05/21/15 Page 1 of 1 Page|D #: 176
`
`E Potter
`Anderson
`Corroon as
`
`l3l3 North Market Street
`P.O. Box 95]
`
`Wilmington, DE l9899—O95l
`302 984 6000
`
`David E. Moore
`Partner
`Attorney at Low
`dmoore@potterc1nderson.com
`302 954-6147 Direct Phone
`302 658-1 W2 Fox
`
`VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
`
`The Honorable Leonard P. Stark
`
`May 21, 2015
`
`The United States District Court for the District of Delaware
`
`J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building
`844 N. King Street
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`
`Re: Mada Phcrrmaceuricals Inc. and Cipla Ltd. v. Aporex Inc. and Apotex Corp,
`CA. No. 14-1453-LPS
`
`Dear Chiefludge Stark:
`
`I am writing on behalf of Defendants in response to Plaintiffs‘ May 19, 2015 letter
`and the April 13, 2015 Scheduling Order entered by the Court (D.I. 18).
`
`Defendants do not oppose an earlier trial date, and Defendants would welcome the
`Court’s guidance on whether an earlier trial date might be feasible. If earlier trial date(s)
`are feasible for the Court, Defendants suggest that the parties confer regarding those dates
`to determine: 1) whether the date(s) are feasible for the parties (so as not to create conflicts
`with already existing trial schedules in other cases); and, if so, 2) a sensible and mutually
`agreeable pretrial schedule (to allow sufficient time for discovery).
`
`Defendants disagree with the portion of Plaintiffs letter that purports to summarize
`what Defendants “declined” during discussions between the parties. The details of
`Plaintiffs’ proposal to Defendants went well beyond a simple inquiry to the Court
`regarding the possibility of an earlier trial date.
`
`In any event, we respectfully thank the Court for its consideration of this matter.
`
`Respectfully,
`
`/.s‘/ David E. Moore (#3983)
`
`David Moore
`
`DEM/rnsb/1 190473/421 12
`
`cc:
`
`Clerk of the Court (via hand delivery)
`All counsel of record (via electronic mail)
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
