Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 27907
`
` Exhibits 1&2
` Redacted in Their Entirety
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 2 of 16 PageID #: 27908
`
`Exhibit 3
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 3 of 16 PageID #: 27909
`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 3 of 16 PagelD #: 27909
`
`IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 177!
`JUDICIAL
`CIRCUIT
`IN
`AND
`FOR
`BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
`
`CASE NO.: 11007902 (33/90)
`
`FAMILY DIVISION
`Hon. Nicholas Lopane
`
`
`
`A\N9+
`
`IN RE: The Marriage of
`
`JULIA A. LEEDY,
`
`Petitioner/Wife,
`
`and
`
`GLENN J. LEEDY,
`
`Respondent/Husband.
`
`Florida Bar No.: 983292
`
`/
`
`HUSBAND’S NOTICE OF FILING WITNESS LIST
`
`The Respondent/Husband, GLENN J. LEEDY,(hereinafter “Husband”), by and through
`
`his undersigned counsel, hereby files his Witness List as follows:
`
`EXPERT WITNESSES:
`
`1, CECELIA GARBER, CPA*/ABV CVA/CFFA
`MarcumRachlin a Division of Marcum, LLP
`450 E. Las Olas Blvd., #950
`Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
`
`TESTIMONY: Ms. Garber’s testimony will be relative to financial analysis including, but not
`lumited to, forensic analysis of the parties’ incomes, assets andliabilities.
`
`2. TAMARA S. THOMAS, M.S.W., C.R.C
`Vocational Rehabilitation Consultant
`P.O. Box 660037
`Miami, FL 33266
`
`TESTIMONY: Ms. Thomas’ testimony will be relative to the Wife’s ability to acquire gainful
`employment.
`
`3. MICHAEL MEACHAM,
`Meacham & Associates, Inc.
`100 SE 12 Street
`Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316
`
`TESTIMONY: Mr. Meacham’s testimony will be relative to real property valuation.
`
`KIRSCHBAUM, BIRNBAUM, LIPPMAN & GREGOIRE, PLLC
`
`1301 EAST BROWARD BLVD., SUITE 230, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33301-2111 (954) 617-2300
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 4 of 16 PageID #: 27910
`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 4 of 16 PagelD #: 27910
`
`Leedy v Leedy, Case No. 11007902 »_./90)
`Husband’s Notice ofFiling Witness List
`Page 2 of5
`
`4, REED BARTON, APPRAISER
`Carmel Appraisal] Services, Inc.
`P.O. Box 7313
`Carmel, CA 93921
`
`TESTIMONY: Mr. Barton’s testimony will be relative to real property valuation.
`
`5. SCOTT PETTIFER, MAI, SRA, CRP
`Pettifer & Associates, Inc.
`2323 N Tustin Avenue
`Suite B-114
`Santa Ana, CA 92705
`
`TESTIMONY: MrPettifer’s testimony will be relative to real property valuation.
`
`6. LEW ZARETZKI, PATENT APPRAISER
`Managing Director
`Hamilton IPV
`
`TESTIMONY:Mr. Zaretzki’s testimony will be relative to patent valuation.
`
`7. RON EPSTEIN
`255 Shoreline, Suite 300
`Redwood City, Ca. 94065
`
`TESTIMONY: Mr. Epstein’s testimony will be relative to his involvement with ELM
`Technology Corporation
`
`8. HUSBAND’S ATTORNEY’S FEE EXPERT
`
`TESTIMONY: The Husband’s attorney’s fee expert will testify to attorney’s fees and costs as
`well as vexatious and spuriouslitigation.
`
`9, RESERVATION TO SUPPLEMENT: All! witnesses necessary for rebuttal and/or
`impeachment purposes and any expert witnesses disclosed by the Wife.
`
`OTHER WITNESSES
`
`10. GLENN LEEDY, HUSBAND
`26147 Carmelo Street
`Carmel, CA 93923
`
`TESTIMONY: Mr. Leedy’s testimony will be relative to all matters plead by both parties.
`
`KIRSCHBAUM, BIRNBAUM, LIPPMAN & GREGOIRE, PLLC
`
`1301 EAST BROWARD BLVD., SUITE 230, FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33301-21117 (954) 617-2300
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 5 of 16 PageID #: 27911
`
`Exhibit 4
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 6 of 16 PageID #: 27912
`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 451 Filed 01/10/22 Page 15 of 23 PageID #: 26956
`
`AO 88A (Rev. (cid:20)(cid:21)/(cid:21)(cid:19)) Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`for the
` District of Delaware
`__________ District of __________
`
`Civil Action No.
`
`14-cv-1430-LPS-JLH
`
`))))))
`
`Elm 3DS Innovations, LLC
`Plaintiff
`v.
`
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al.
`Defendant
`
`SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION IN A CIVIL ACTION
`
`To:
`
`Juliette E. Lippman
`Birnbaum, Lippman & Gregoire, PLLC, 1301 E. Broward Blvd., Suite 230, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
`(Name of person to whom this subpoena is directed)
`✔
`(cid:117) (cid:55)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:80)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:92)(cid:29)(cid:3)(cid:3)(cid:60)(cid:50)(cid:56)(cid:3)(cid:36)(cid:53)(cid:40)(cid:3)(cid:38)(cid:50)(cid:48)(cid:48)(cid:36)(cid:49)(cid:39)(cid:40)(cid:39)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:83)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:71)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:79)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:3)
`(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:82)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:78)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:76)(cid:89)(cid:76)(cid:79)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:44)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:92)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:74)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:93)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:92)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:80)(cid:83)(cid:87)(cid:79)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:73)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:74)(cid:82)(cid:82)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:68)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)
`(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:89)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:88)(cid:69)(cid:83)(cid:82)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:79)(cid:79)(cid:82)(cid:90)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:86)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:73)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:87)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:80)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:71)(cid:3)(cid:92)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:88)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:3)
`(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:73)(cid:73)(cid:76)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:86)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:71)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:86)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:76)(cid:81)(cid:74)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:74)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:86)(cid:15)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:71)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:81)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:83)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:86)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:3)(cid:90)(cid:75)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:70)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:82)(cid:3)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:73)(cid:92)(cid:3)(cid:82)(cid:81)(cid:3)(cid:92)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:85)(cid:3)(cid:69)(cid:72)(cid:75)(cid:68)(cid:79)(cid:73)(cid:3)(cid:68)(cid:69)(cid:82)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:3)
`(cid:87)(cid:75)(cid:72)(cid:86)(cid:72)(cid:3)(cid:80)(cid:68)(cid:87)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:86)(cid:29)
`
`See Attachment B.
`
`Place:
`
`TBD
`
`Date and Time:
`
`02/15/2022 9:00 am
`
`The deposition will be recorded by this method:
`
`Stenographically and videotaped
`
`(cid:117) Production: You, or your representatives, must also bring with you to the deposition the following documents,
`electronically stored information, or objects, and must permit inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the
`material:
`
`The following provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 are attached – Rule 45(c), relating to the place of compliance;
`Rule 45(d), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena; and Rule 45(e) and (g), relating to your duty to
`respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so.
`
`Date:
`
`CLERK OF COURT
`
`Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
`
`OR
`
`/s/ Yar R. Chaikovsky
`Attorney’s signature
`
`The name, address, e-mail address, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of party)
`Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al.
`, who issues or requests this subpoena, are:
`Yar R. Chaikovsky, 1117 California Avenue, Palo Alto, CA 94304, yarchaikovsky@paulhastings.com, (650) 320-1800
`
`Notice to the person who issues or requests this subpoena
`If this subpoena commands the production of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things before
`trial, a notice and a copy of the subpoena must be served on each party in this case before it is served on the person to
`whom it is directed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4).
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 7 of 16 PageID #: 27913
`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 451 Filed 01/10/22 Page 16 of 23 PageID #: 26957
`
`AO 88A (Rev. (cid:20)2/(cid:21)(cid:19)) Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action (Page 2)
`
`Civil Action No.
`
`14-cv-1430-LPS-JLH
`
`PROOF OF SERVICE
`(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.)
`
`I received this subpoena for (name of individual and title, if any)
`.
`
`on (date)
`
`(cid:117) I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named individual as follows:
`
`(cid:117) I returned the subpoena unexecuted because:
`
`on (date)
`
`; or
`
`Unless the subpoena was issued on behalf of the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also
`tendered to the witness the fees for one day’s attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of
`$
`.
`
`My fees are $
`
`for travel and $
`
`for services, for a total of $
`
`0.00
`
`.
`
`.
`
`I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
`
`Date:
`
`Additional information regarding attempted service, etc.:
`
`Server’s signature
`
`Printed name and title
`
`Server’s address
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 8 of 16 PageID #: 27914
`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 451 Filed 01/10/22 Page 17 of 23 PageID #: 26958
`
`AO 88A (Rev. (cid:20)2/(cid:21)(cid:19)) Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action (Page 3)
`Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), (e), and (g) (Effective 12/1/13)
`(i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,
`or commercial information; or
`(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that does
`not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’s
`study that was not requested by a party.
`(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstances
`described in Rule 45(d)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or
`modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified
`conditions if the serving party:
`(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be
`otherwise met without undue hardship; and
`(ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated.
`
`(c) Place of Compliance.
`
`(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A subpoena may command a
`person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition only as follows:
`(A) within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or
`regularly transacts business in person; or
`(B) within the state where the person resides, is employed, or regularly
`transacts business in person, if the person
`(i) is a party or a party’s officer; or
`(ii) is commanded to attend a trial and would not incur substantial
`expense.
`
`(2) For Other Discovery. A subpoena may command:
`(A) production of documents, electronically stored information, or
`tangible things at a place within 100 miles of where the person resides, is
`employed, or regularly transacts business in person; and
`(B) inspection of premises at the premises to be inspected.
`
`(d) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena; Enforcement.
`
`(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorney
`responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable steps
`to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the
`subpoena. The court for the district where compliance is required must
`enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction—which may include
`lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees—on a party or attorney who
`fails to comply.
`
`(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection.
`(A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce
`documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to
`permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of
`production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition,
`hearing, or trial.
`(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangible
`things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated
`in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing, or
`sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises—or to
`producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested.
`The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for
`compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made,
`the following rules apply:
`(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party
`may move the court for the district where compliance is required for an
`order compelling production or inspection.
`(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the
`order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer from
`significant expense resulting from compliance.
`
`(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.
`
`(A) When Required. On timely motion, the court for the district where
`compliance is required must quash or modify a subpoena that:
`
`(i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;
`(ii) requires a person to comply beyond the geographical limits
`specified in Rule 45(c);
`(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no
`exception or waiver applies; or
`(iv) subjects a person to undue burden.
`(B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a
`subpoena, the court for the district where compliance is required may, on
`motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires:
`
`(e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
`
`(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These
`procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored
`information:
`(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents
`must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or
`must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.
`(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified.
`If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored
`information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in
`which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.
`(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The
`person responding need not produce the same electronically stored
`information in more than one form.
`(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The person
`responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information
`from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because
`of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective
`order, the person responding must show that the information is not
`reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is
`made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the
`requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule
`26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.
`
`(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.
`(A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information
`under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation
`material must:
`(i) expressly make the claim; and
`(ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or
`tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself
`privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.
`(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a
`subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as
`trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party
`that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being
`notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified
`information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information
`until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the
`information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly
`present the information under seal to the court for the district where
`compliance is required for a determination of the claim. The person who
`produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is
`resolved.
`
`(g) Contempt.
`The court for the district where compliance is required—and also, after a
`motion is transferred, the issuing court—may hold in contempt a person
`who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey the
`subpoena or an order related to it.
`
`For access to subpoena materials, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a) Committee Note (2013).
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 9 of 16 PageID #: 27915
`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 451 Filed 01/10/22 Page 18 of 23 PageID #: 26959
`
`
`ATTACHMENT B
`
`DEFINITIONS
`
`The following definitions are applicable to terms employed in this Notice:
`
`1.
`
`“Leedy Divorce Proceeding” refers to In re: The Marriage of Julia A. Leedy and
`
`Glenn J. Leedy, No. 11-007902 (Fla. 17th Cir. Ct.).
`
`2.
`
`“Patents-at-Issue” shall mean United States Patent Nos. 7,193,239; 7,474,004;
`
`7,504,732; 8,035,233; 8,410,617; 8,629,542; 8,653,672; 8,791,581; 8,796,862; 8,841,778;
`
`8,907,499; 8,928,119; and 8,933,570.
`
`3.
`
`“Related Patents” shall include, whether or not abandoned and whether or not
`
`issued, (a) any patent or patent application that claims priority to the Patents- at-Issue, (b) any
`
`patent or patent application that claims priority from any patent or patent application to which
`
`the Patents-at-Issue claims priority, (c) any patent or patent application on which the Patents-at-
`
`Issue depends for priority, (d) any patent or patent application identified in the Related U.S.
`
`Application Data for the Patents-at-Issue, (e) any patent or patent application that claims priority
`
`from any patent or patent application identified in the Related U.S. Application Data for any of
`
`the Patents-at-Issue, (f) any reissue or reexamination of any of the aforementioned patents or
`
`patent applications, and (g) any foreign counterpart patent or foreign counterpart application of
`
`any of the aforementioned patents or patent applications (a foreign counterpart patent and
`
`foreign counterpart application shall include any foreign patent or foreign patent application in
`
`which a claim for priority has been made in either a U.S. application or a foreign application
`
`based on the other, or that the disclosures of the U.S. and foreign patent applications are
`
`substantively identical).
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 10 of 16 PageID #: 27916
`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 451 Filed 01/10/22 Page 19 of 23 PageID #: 26960
`
`
`4.
`
`“You” shall mean Juliette E. Lippman and any person or entity acting or
`
`purporting to act on your behalf, including, but not limited to Birnbaum, Lippman & Gregoire,
`
`PLLC.
`
`5.
`
`“Patent Infringement Litigation” refers to Elm 3DS Innovations, LLC v. Samsung
`
`Electronics Co., Ltd., et al., No. 1:14-cv-01430-LPS (D. Del.).
`
`6.
`
`The term “Samsung” refers to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung
`
`Semiconductor, Inc., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Austin Semiconductor,
`
`LLC and their officers, directors, employees, agents, representatives, attorneys, affiliates,
`
`successors, and assigns, and to persons and entities acting or purporting, to act on behalf of
`
`Samsung.
`
`7.
`
`The term “Elm” refers to Elm Technology Corporation and its employees, agents,
`
`representatives, attorneys, affiliates, predecessors, successors, and assigns, and to persons and
`
`entities acting or purporting to act on behalf of Elm Technology Corporation, including, but not
`
`limited to Elm 3DS Innovations, LLC and Glenn J. Leedy.
`
`8.
`
`The term “person,” unless otherwise specified, means any natural person, firm,
`
`partnership, association, corporation, business, proprietorship, government or quasi-
`
`governmental body, agency or commission, or any other organization or entity.
`
`9.
`
`The term “document” and its plural shall refer to anything that would be a
`
`“writing” or “recording” as defined in Rule 1001 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, or a
`
`“document,” as defined in Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and refers to all
`
`handwritten, typed, printed, electronic, or otherwise visually or aurally reproduced materials,
`
`and all originals and copies that contain any notes, handwriting, underscoring, deletions, or that
`
`in any way otherwise differ from the original thereof. Such documents include but are not limited
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 11 of 16 PageID #: 27917
`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 451 Filed 01/10/22 Page 20 of 23 PageID #: 26961
`
`
`to: (1) all the written, printed, recorded, graphic, or sound reproductions, however produced,
`
`including but not limited to correspondence, memoranda, notes, telegrams, notebooks, diaries,
`
`desk calendars, charts, photographs, and records of any kind; (2) all computer-readable data
`
`compilations, including but not limited to tapes, diskettes, card, cassettes; electronic mail, and
`
`all other electronic or mechanical devices which contain information stored in mainframe and
`
`personal computers or devices (such as PDAs/cell phones) or accessible “online”; (3) all
`
`originals, drafts, and copies that differ in any respect from the original, all marginal comments
`
`that appear on such documents, all transcripts or recordings of such documents, and all
`
`attachments, enclosures, or documents affixed or referred to in such documents.
`
`10.
`
`The terms “relating,” “related,” or “relates” shall mean concerning, referring,
`
`describing, evidencing, or constituting the referenced subject matter, to the extent that such
`
`material is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
`
`11.
`
`The words “and,” “or,” and “and/or” shall be construed conjunctively or
`
`disjunctively, whichever maximizes the scope of each discovery request in which they are used.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 12 of 16 PageID #: 27918
`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 451 Filed 01/10/22 Page 21 of 23 PageID #: 26962
`
`
`DEPOSITION TOPICS
`
`1.
`
`Any documents and communications You produce in response to a subpoena
`
`from Samsung.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`The value of the Patents-at-Issue and any Related Patents.
`
`The value of Elm.
`
`Any expert reports, other expert disclosures, or expert depositions from the
`
`Leedy Divorce Proceeding that relate to the value of one or more of the Patents-at-Issue and/or
`
`any Related Patents.
`
`5.
`
`Any documents or communications regarding the value of one or more of the
`
`Patents-at-Issue and/or any Related Patents.
`
`Any documents or communications regarding the value of Elm.
`
`Any litigation concerning one or more of the Patents-at-Issue and/or any Related
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`Patents.
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 13 of 16 PageID #: 27919
`
`Exhibit 5
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 14 of 16 PageID #: 27920
`
`Razick, James
`"jel@kblglaw.com"
`Chaikovsky, Yar R.
`Elm/Samsung Subpoenas
`Thursday, January 27, 2022 10:49:26 PM
`image001.png
`M-Protective Order - Depo of J. Lippman.pdf
`M-Protective Order - Subpoena for Records.pdf
`
`From:
`To:
`Cc:
`Subject:
`Date:
`Attachments:
`
`Juliette,
`
`We received the attached protective order motions that you filed. Perhaps I misunderstood our conversation earlier today, but this
`seems inconsistent with that conversation.
`
`During that conversation, I noted that we were willing to work with you to avoid the need for any motion practice related to the
`subpoenas. I further noted that we were not seeking any attorney-client privileged information or any protected work-product.
`Samsung’s subpoenas are focused on information related to the patents at issue in the divorce proceeding. Thus, responsive
`documents would include, for example, deposition transcripts where the patents or related topics were discussed, as well as any
`potential correspondence exchanged between the parties during the divorce proceedings related to the patents. None of those
`documents would be privileged or protected work product. You stated that you would look through your files from the divorce
`proceeding for such responsive documents, and we would schedule a follow-up call next Friday (February 4) to discuss. In light of
`that, I said we could extend the deadline on the subpoena to produce documents to the following Monday (February 7). It was my
`understanding that this would obviate the need for any present motion practice.
`
`As I stated on our call earlier, we remain willing to work with you to resolve these subpoenas without any further motion practice or
`intervention of the Court. For example, we can identify a mutually agreeable location and time for any document production, which
`can likely be transferred via electronic means if that is easiest for you. Likewise, to the extent a deposition is necessary, we can also
`identify a mutually agreeable date and time; any deposition could also likely proceed via Zoom or other videoconferencing platform.
`
`If it would be helpful to discuss any of this, I’m available tomorrow, as well as next week.
`
`Sincerely,
`James
`
`James Razick | Associate, Litigation Department
`Paul Hastings LLP | 2050 M Street NW, Washington, DC 20036 | Direct: +1.202.551.1877 |
`Main: +1.202.551.1700 | Fax: +1.202.551.0377 | jamesrazick@paulhastings.com |
`www.paulhastings.com
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 15 of 16 PageID #: 27921
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Adam W. Poff, hereby certify that on February 23, 2022, I caused a true and
`
`correct copy of the attached document to be served by e-mail on the following counsel:
`
`Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. Esquire
`Brian E. Farnan, Esquire
`Michael J. Farnan, Esquire
`Farnan, LLP
`919 North Market Street, 12th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`farnan@farnanlaw.com
`bfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`mfarnan@farnanlaw.com
`
`Adam K. Mortara, Esquire
`125 South Wacker Dr., Suite 300
`Chicago, IL 60606
`adam@mortaralaw.com
`
`Matthew R. Ford, Esquire
`Bartlit Beck LLP
`54 West Hubbard Street, Suite 300
`Chicago, IL 60654
`matthew.ford@bartlit-beck.com
`
`John M. Hughes, Esquire
`Katherine L.I. Hacker, Esquire
`Nosson D. Knobloch, Esquire
`Daniel C. Taylor, Esquire
`Bartlit Beck LLP
`1801 Wewatta, Suite 1200
`Denver, CO 80202
`john.hughes@bartlit-beck.com
`kat.hacker@bartlit-beck.com
`nosson.knobloch@bartlit-beck.com
`dan.taylor@bartlit-beck.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`26987969.1
`
`

`

`Case 1:14-cv-01430-LPS Document 479-1 Filed 02/23/22 Page 16 of 16 PageID #: 27922
`
` YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT
` & TAYLOR, LLP
`
`/s/ Adam W. Poff
`Adam W. Poff (No. 3990)
`Pilar G. Kraman (No. 5199)
`Rodney Square
`1000 North King Street
`Wilmington, Delaware 19801
`(302) 571-6600
`apoff@ycst.com
`pkraman@ycst.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendants
`
`26987969.1
`
`2
`
`